Election 1992 With 2016 Demographics

[libertpaulian]

What would the Clinton vs. Bush vs. Perot election have been like with November 2016 demographics?  Note that one caveat exists: the political, cultural, and social climate of 1992 remains the same.

Discuss with maps and reasoning.

[P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong]

Who would be the equivalent of Perot?

[libertpaulian]

Who would be the equivalent of Perot?

It would be Bush vs. Clinton vs. Perot.  The year would be 1992, same events, culture, political climate, technology, everything.  The only difference is that the demographic makeup of 1992 is that of the year 2016.

[libertpaulian]

Bump

[Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner]

Bump

Better for Clinton.

[Mr. Smith]

Clinton wins an outright majority.

[The Self]

Perhaps something like this.

406/132

[libertpaulian]

Perhaps something like this.

406/132

I still say he wins KY and TN. 

I'd even add Indiana to the list.  He only won it by 6%.  2016's demographics have made Marion County turn blue.  If Marion County went blue, along with all of the Southern Indiana counties that went for Slick Willy, that turns Indiana into a win for Clinton.