Pete Wilson 1996: Could he have won CA?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:57:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Pete Wilson 1996: Could he have won CA?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
No, it was solid Clinton in any case
 
#2
Only if Wilson won the election
 
#3
Wilson would have won it even if he lost
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 16

Author Topic: Pete Wilson 1996: Could he have won CA?  (Read 795 times)
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 15, 2017, 03:15:47 PM »

Pete Wilson, overwhelmingly re-elected CA governor in 1994, mounted an early 1996 Presidential bid. Bob Dole would later make winning CA is number one priority, even in the last few months of the campaign. Could Wilson have won?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2017, 03:30:15 PM »

Clinton wins. Wilson might have done better in the state, possibly, but the factors that helped Clinton do better in CA in 96 compared to 92 were already baked in, and stayed in effect regardless of whether Pete was the GOP nominee.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2017, 03:43:35 PM »

Wrong. Board.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2017, 03:59:05 PM »

If he gets over 47.5% of the popular vote/wins the electoral college, he wins California. I think Perot would drop out and endorse Wilson if Wilson campaigned against NAFTA, free trade in general, for balanced budgets, and stricter immigration laws, while generally being an economic populist and social libertarian.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2017, 04:48:37 PM »

                                                                                                                                                                               
Don't moderators have the power to move threads?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2017, 05:00:12 PM »

                                                                                                                                                                               
Don't moderators have the power to move threads?

Only mods assigned to this board (Torie being the only active one.)
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2017, 05:43:50 PM »

                                                                                                                                                                               
Don't moderators have the power to move threads?

Only mods assigned to this board (Torie being the only active one.)

I already reported the post, but seeing it twice really irked me.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,197
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2017, 05:58:46 PM »

Nope.

Nixon couldn't even win the state by anything significant despite being born there, and before someone says "muh 1972", the state trended significantly left of the nation that year.

Besides Reagan's elections, every other election after LBJ was Lean R turf at best brought on by either a bad fit (Carter) or a hilariously bad campaign (Dukakis). '76 and '88 were easily winnable, only Orange County stood in the way. Frank Church and Al Gore would've pulled it off.

Clinton winning in '92 was just an overdue flip. And given the margin he won it by, no chance in heck he'd lose it in '96 with the nature of his campaign. No way, no how. Not even if he only took 47% of the vote.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 14 queries.