If the Dem primary came down to Booker versus Warren...

[Blue3]

Who would you vote for?

Who would win the primary?

[Technocracy Timmy]

Warren because she aligns more with my foreign policy and economic views.

I think Warren would edge it out in the end.

[Hoosier_Nick]

I would enthusiastically vote for Warren. While Booker may do a little bit better against Trump, I generally agree with Warren on more and she would definitely lead a progressive administration.

[Rookie Yinzer]

Option 1.

[Hammy]

Probably Warren, but I have no idea who'd win between the two. They aren't exactly well-liked at the moment by the progressive wing of the party so it would essentially be two establishment candidates.

[7,052,770]

Probably Warren, but I have no idea who'd win between the two. They aren't exactly well-liked at the moment by the progressive wing of the party so it would essentially be two establishment candidates.

That's why you just can't worry about what that wing of the party thinks. By objective measures, these are two of the 5 most liberal/progressive  senators. I'd be happy to have either as president and I think they would make an excellent ticket in either order.

The "progressive" wing is never going to be happy no matter what happens. If Bernie got the nomination, they'd find a reason to turn on him.

[OSR STANDS WITH PALESTINE]

Warren would get my vote here

[Kingpoleon]

The poll is confusing - how am I supposed to know who you would vote for?

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Warren is ageless and less likely to beat Trump, eventhough she is the Bernie Sanders crowd, I would support Booker

[Liberalrocks]

Option 1.

[Edgeofnight]

Booker all the Way.

[Coraxion]

#3.

[Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner]

Warren is a terrible candidate, and the Sandernistas aren't the democratic party.

[Lord Admirale]

Enthusiastically Booker. Booker would win.

[dw93]

Warren. Booker is too cozy with the pharmaceutical industry for my taste.

[GoTfan]

Warren is a terrible candidate, and the Sandernistas aren't the democratic party.

You don't want the left? Fine. Just stop blaming them for Hillary losing and don't be surprised when they start voti g Green en masse. Under Obama, we lost 1000 seats. The Republicans control two thirds of the Governorships. They control the House and Senate.

Get out of the Third Way bubble for a minute and realise that the Democrats need to start appealing to independent and working class voters (who seem to like Bernie's agenda quite a bit). Clintonism is not a viable ideology anymore. It doesn’t work now. The Clinton days are over, sunshine. Stop being the party of Wall Street (Hillary literally said that bankers should have a public face and private face, but this forum's love for Hillary borders on the weird), stop cosying up to special interests and corporations, and start being actually left wing on a few issues, and you might see a change. Hillary also had a car crash of a campaign that Van Jones summed up aptly as "lighting a billion dollars on fire."

Time to try something new. "But he's not a Democrat" is irrelevant when he's been caucusing with them since 1991..

[BaldEagle1991]

I'd vote for Warren, and Warren would win.

[Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner]

Warren is a terrible candidate, and the Sandernistas aren't the democratic party.

You don't want the left? Fine. Just stop blaming them for Hillary losing and don't be surprised when they start voti g Green en masse. Under Obama, we lost 1000 seats. The Republicans control two thirds of the Governorships. They control the House and Senate.

Get out of the Third Way bubble for a minute and realise that the Democrats need to start appealing to independent and working class voters (who seem to like Bernie's agenda quite a bit). Clintonism is not a viable ideology anymore. It doesn’t work now. The Clinton days are over, sunshine. Stop being the party of Wall Street (Hillary literally said that bankers should have a public face and private face, but this forum's love for Hillary borders on the weird), stop cosying up to special interests and corporations, and start being actually left wing on a few issues, and you might see a change. Hillary also had a car crash of a campaign that Van Jones summed up aptly as "lighting a billion dollars on fire."

Time to try something new. "But he's not a Democrat" is irrelevant when he's been caucusing with them since 1991..

A. She never said bankers should have a public face and private face.
B. Corporations aren't satan, and characterizing them as so shows your immaturity.
C. How many Sanders endorsed candidates have won who were not incumbents?

[President Johnson]

Probably Warren would win. However, I'd support Booker.