Security vs Privacy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:39:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Security vs Privacy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does security trump privacy?
#1
Yes (D)		  
#2
No (D)		  
#3
Yes (R)		  
#4
No (R)		  
#5
Yes (I)		  
#6
No (I)		  
#7
Yes (L)		  
#8
No (L)		  
#9
Yes (Other)		  
#10
No (Other)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: Security vs Privacy  (Read 1261 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054
« on: August 11, 2005, 07:32:36 AM »
It depends on the circumstances. Security never trumps arbitrary or groundless invasion of privacy (security cameras in every home, wiretaps on every phone, and the like). If there is probable cause, however, a warrant is justified.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2005, 09:02:17 AM »
« Edited: August 11, 2005, 09:06:39 AM by Emsworth »
Quote from: Virginian87 on August 11, 2005, 08:35:36 AM
Take a look at Griswold v. Connecticut.
What about Griswold? If you mean that "privacy" is more broad than my earlier post implied, I would agree, but the post is within the context of the security vs. privacy question.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2005, 09:06:25 AM »
Quote from: Virginian87 on August 11, 2005, 09:05:15 AM
It has to do with the right to privacy.
Yes, I know. I mean, what does it have to do with security as opposed to privacy? It was about contraception.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.