Democrats Are ‘Children Of Satan,’ Right-Wing Radio Host Says

[JA]

Democrats Are ‘Children Of Satan,’ Right-Wing Radio Host Says

You must be logged in to read this quote.

An audio clip of the comments is provided in the link.

Signed,
    
     Registered Child of Satan

[NewYorkExpress]

Well, If Democrats are children of Satan, then I'm proud to be a child of Satan.

[publicunofficial]

Folks, both sides need to done down the rhetoric.

[Cashew]

Folks, both sides need to done down the rhetoric.

[RI]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

[Mr. Smith]

Projection much?

And besides, it's sisters and brothers to him anyway. He's a brother who chose wrong, but nonetheless a brother.

[Beet]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

While it's literally impossible for people to know better than God, God gave us a brain in order to think, otherwise he would have left the brain part out. It's all part of God's plan. In any case, Trump isn't very Godly.

[HAnnA MArin County]

Now that's ironic seeing as how most of what Republicans stand for is the antithesis of what Jesus preached, but I expect nothing more from these wolves in sheep's clothing who seem to think that Christianity is correlated to being a Republican.

[publicunofficial]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

Hail Satan then.

[JA]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

Hail Satan then.

[Mr. Smith]

...At least Uncle Ruckus had a bunch of jobs that helped people...

[The Arizonan]

Remembers guys, Satan has a lower count of confirmed kills than God does.

I'd rather worship Satan than a petty deity who kills people for non-serious stuff.

There should be an event in which people pose as Satan worshippers and parade in front of churches like Westboro Baptist Church.

[Zioneer]

Projection much?

And besides, it's sisters and brothers to him anyway. He's a brother who chose wrong, but nonetheless a brother.

Side note: he probably thinks you and I are already children of Satan since we're Mormons, so I bet in his eyes, we are double Satanbabies.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

...but we knew this.

[Person Man]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

Puts my shiitposting to shame.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

Now that's ironic seeing as how most of what Republicans stand for is the antithesis of what Jesus preached, but I expect nothing more from these wolves in sheep's clothing who seem to think that Christianity is correlated to being a Republican.

The warmongering of the Republican Party is something that is un-Christian, but Democrats do that too.  Jesus also said nothing about whether helping the poor should be done through private charity or through government involvement.  And when you factor in Democrats' support for abortion, the GOP is clearly the lesser of two evils from a Christian perspective.

[Torie]

I was unaware Satan had children. Can someone explain that for me?

[Person Man]

Now that's ironic seeing as how most of what Republicans stand for is the antithesis of what Jesus preached, but I expect nothing more from these wolves in sheep's clothing who seem to think that Christianity is correlated to being a Republican.

The warmongering of the Republican Party is something that is un-Christian, but Democrats do that too.  Jesus also said nothing about whether helping the poor should be done through private charity or through government involvement.  And when you factor in Democrats' support for abortion, the GOP is clearly the lesser of two evils from a Christian perspective.

1) That sort of hair splitting doesn't matter if you are truly concerned about the poor.

2) Then again, the same can be said about issues about pacifism and other forms of social behavior.

The issue isn't who believes in God, but rather about who believes in which part of the State 

[kyc0705]

Unsurprising. Satan is a total daddy.

[pbrower2a]

The right-wing suggestion: that people not rich will humble themselves before their masters and dedicate their entire lives to the enrichment of their masters in one big, happy plantation.

Violence is wrong as a general rule.

I hate Donald Trump. I thought him merely a sick joke so long as I could avoid his influence. It's not because he is rich; it is because he uses his riches to create a nasty, vulgar world.  There are nasty, vulgar poor people, too, and I don't like them. But at least the poor have the excuse of inadequate education. Donald Trump has no such excuse; he is about as pure an egoist as a hero in an Ayn Rand novel -- the type who sees his selfish greed as a great virtue and the rightful role of the rest of humanity to defer to his selfish greed.   

The rich are fine when they get their riches by doing real good for people through innovations in commerce and technology. Whatever their faults, John D. Rockefeller at least got us inexpensive energy; Henry Ford got us some affordable cars; the movie moguls of the 1930s gave us a great wealth of cultural expression worthy of continued appreciation; Sam Walton made a lot of the good life available to people who had been priced out of it. So what does Trump do? He simply exploits a permanent scarcity in housing. Except for an excursion into reality TV -- bad reality TV worse than what I usually reject -- his entrepreneurial efforts have been failures. They guy lost money in casinos -- and in vodka. Can you imagine losing money as the owner of a casino or in making vodka?   

The only good thing that I can see about Donald Trump is that he is showing us what to reject in the next leader. He's making Obama look like an FDR or Lincoln by contrast even if Obama's temperament and inability to force his agenda suggests Eisenhower.   


Donald Trump is a corrupt kleptocrat who sees power solely as a pretext to enrich and indulge himself. His taste says "Ceausescu", "Qaddafi", or "Saddam". Does anyone want to guess what Warren Buffett thinks of him? 

[RI]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

While it's literally impossible for people to know better than God, God gave us a brain in order to think, otherwise he would have left the brain part out. It's all part of God's plan. In any case, Trump isn't very Godly.

Sure, but not all possible thoughts and actions are in accordance with God's will; He gave us fists, but that itself doesn't morally justify a punch. That's part of the whole free will thing.

The Bible is predicated on the notion that God's will is inherently and definitionally the highest possible good, ergo deviation from it is suboptimal at best and outright evil at worst. Every time Satan appears in the Bible, his message is consistent. He talks to people who know what the right thing is, but for whom doing what they want to do would be easier, more pleasureful, and full of positive worldly consequences. When Satan came to Jesus in the desert, it was to tell Him that taking the easy way out would give Him all kinds of worldly wonders, despite the fact He knew the Father's will for Him was anything but easy.

The Left complains God's commands as understood through the Bible are too strict, too hard, too intolerant, too offensive. Wouldn't it be easier to just ignore them? Think of all the money, fame, sex, drugs, and power you could have. Wouldn't that just be so good? Think of how many fewer arguments we'd have if no one cared what others did. No one would ever have to feel judged for what they did; no one would have to ever experience anything negative which might actually build moral character. Everything would just be so easy. And at the end of the day, when you feel that gaping maw of emptiness inside you, it's okay because you can fill it with new shallow frivolities tomorrow; you can always mortgage your soul another day.

But at least liberals care about the worldly pleasantries of others. Libertarians and some others on the Right (including Trump) would take even that if they could extract another ounce of worldly pleasure for themselves. Atheists go so far as to say God's commands don't even exist, and spend their lives pre-gaming for the absence of God awaiting them after this life, going so far as to lionize eternal annihilation as a desirable end. The Satanic call is so ingrained in their psyche that even the infinite beauty of God's love becomes like ash in their mouths, something to be despised and hated even if they believed it existed. It's no coincidence that the Church of Satan is essentially an atheistic, libertarian cult.

You can see all that in this very thread. Satan's servants will embrace him at the slightest provocation, even if they never realized they were so before. Sure, it may often come as jest, but it is a Freudian jest at best; that they would even allow such an equivocation is telling in itself.

[Classic Conservative]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

Amen, brother!

[afleitch]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

While it's literally impossible for people to know better than God, God gave us a brain in order to think, otherwise he would have left the brain part out. It's all part of God's plan. In any case, Trump isn't very Godly.

Sure, but not all possible thoughts and actions are in accordance with God's will; He gave us fists, but that itself doesn't morally justify a punch. That's part of the whole free will thing.

The Bible is predicated on the notion that God's will is inherently and definitionally the highest possible good, ergo deviation from it is suboptimal at best and outright evil at worst. Every time Satan appears in the Bible, his message is consistent. He talks to people who know what the right thing is, but for whom doing what they want to do would be easier, more pleasureful, and full of positive worldly consequences. When Satan came to Jesus in the desert, it was to tell Him that taking the easy way out would give Him all kinds of worldly wonders, despite the fact He knew the Father's will for Him was anything but easy.

The Left complains God's commands as understood through the Bible are too strict, too hard, too intolerant, too offensive. Wouldn't it be easier to just ignore them? Think of all the money, fame, sex, drugs, and power you could have. Wouldn't that just be so good? Think of how many fewer arguments we'd have if no one cared what others did. No one would ever have to feel judged for what they did; no one would have to ever experience anything negative which might actually build moral character. Everything would just be so easy. And at the end of the day, when you feel that gaping maw of emptiness inside you, it's okay because you can fill it with new shallow frivolities tomorrow; you can always mortgage your soul another day.

But at least liberals care about the worldly pleasantries of others. Libertarians and some others on the Right (including Trump) would take even that if they could extract another ounce of worldly pleasure for themselves. Atheists go so far as to say God's commands don't even exist, and spend their lives pre-gaming for the absence of God awaiting them after this life, going so far as to lionize eternal annihilation as a desirable end. The Satanic call is so ingrained in their psyche that even the infinite beauty of God's love becomes like ash in their mouths, something to be despised and hated even if they believed it existed. It's no coincidence that the Church of Satan is essentially an atheistic, libertarian cult.

You can see all that in this very thread. Satan's servants will embrace him at the slightest provocation, even if they never realized they were so before. Sure, it may often come as jest, but it is a Freudian jest at best; that they would even allow such an equivocation is telling in itself.

I love you too.

[Person Man]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

While it's literally impossible for people to know better than God, God gave us a brain in order to think, otherwise he would have left the brain part out. It's all part of God's plan. In any case, Trump isn't very Godly.

Sure, but not all possible thoughts and actions are in accordance with God's will; He gave us fists, but that itself doesn't morally justify a punch. That's part of the whole free will thing.

The Bible is predicated on the notion that God's will is inherently and definitionally the highest possible good, ergo deviation from it is suboptimal at best and outright evil at worst. Every time Satan appears in the Bible, his message is consistent. He talks to people who know what the right thing is, but for whom doing what they want to do would be easier, more pleasureful, and full of positive worldly consequences. When Satan came to Jesus in the desert, it was to tell Him that taking the easy way out would give Him all kinds of worldly wonders, despite the fact He knew the Father's will for Him was anything but easy.

The Left complains God's commands as understood through the Bible are too strict, too hard, too intolerant, too offensive. Wouldn't it be easier to just ignore them? Think of all the money, fame, sex, drugs, and power you could have. Wouldn't that just be so good? Think of how many fewer arguments we'd have if no one cared what others did. No one would ever have to feel judged for what they did; no one would have to ever experience anything negative which might actually build moral character. Everything would just be so easy. And at the end of the day, when you feel that gaping maw of emptiness inside you, it's okay because you can fill it with new shallow frivolities tomorrow; you can always mortgage your soul another day.

But at least liberals care about the worldly pleasantries of others. Libertarians and some others on the Right (including Trump) would take even that if they could extract another ounce of worldly pleasure for themselves. Atheists go so far as to say God's commands don't even exist, and spend their lives pre-gaming for the absence of God awaiting them after this life, going so far as to lionize eternal annihilation as a desirable end. The Satanic call is so ingrained in their psyche that even the infinite beauty of God's love becomes like ash in their mouths, something to be despised and hated even if they believed it existed. It's no coincidence that the Church of Satan is essentially an atheistic, libertarian cult.

You can see all that in this very thread. Satan's servants will embrace him at the slightest provocation, even if they never realized they were so before. Sure, it may often come as jest, but it is a Freudian jest at best; that they would even allow such an equivocation is telling in itself.

Yes but this wasn't originally about complaining that people you disagree with are  putting their private interests before the common good. This was originally about whether people you disagree with are human or should be allowed to live at all. Unless you argue that the former implies the latter.

[RINO Tom]

Modern secular social liberalism has at its root the same pitch as Satan gave to Eve: you know better than God, so why follow His rules? In a very literal way, social liberalism, atheism, libertarianism, etc. could all be labeled as Satanic and rightfully so.

Your definition of secular seems deranged to me, as it would include millions of people who consider themselves Christians and simply interpret things differntly than you, so I'll grab myself a grain of salt.  Cool maps, though!