Opinion of Bagel23?

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Intentionally and emphatically misgendered Peebs, makes him an automatic HP.

[Badger]

Not highly thought of, and overrated even by that standard.

[Badger]

Not highly thought of, and overrated even by that standard.

[JustinTimeCuber]

Intentionally and emphatically misgendered Peebs, and then doubled down on a different thread, clarifying it was intentional, makes him an automatic HP.

[Lachi]

Concern troll and all-round asshole.
HP

[Skunk]

Intentionally and emphatically misgendered Peebs, and then doubled down on a different thread, clarifying it was intentional, makes him an automatic HP.

Would've probably voted FF otherwise but uh... yeah, no.

[JA]

HP

Transphobic Texan trash

[Santander]

Sorry if this makes me an asshole, but I don't understand the outrage. This is the Internet. If you want people to think you are a woman, why not just say you are a woman, full stop? If you don't want people walking on your lawn, you build a fence.

Anyway, not a FF, but for other reasons.

[JustinTimeCuber]

Sorry if this makes me an asshole, but I don't understand the outrage. This is the Internet. If you want people to think you are a woman, why not just say you are a woman, full stop? If you don't want people walking on your lawn, you build a fence.

Anyway, not a FF, but for other reasons.

so being transgendered makes someone less of a woman?

[Donerail]

my life has never been improved by reading a bagel23 post and has on several occasions been made marginally worse

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

Intentionally and emphatically misgendered Peebs, and then doubled down on a different thread, clarifying it was intentional, makes him an automatic HP.

Would've probably voted FF otherwise but uh... yeah, no.

[This account no longer in use.]

Sorry if this makes me an asshole, but I don't understand the outrage. This is the Internet. If you want people to think you are a woman, why not just say you are a woman, full stop? If you don't want people walking on your lawn, you build a fence.

Anyway, not a FF, but for other reasons.

Peebs has made her gender very clear, and Bagel was well aware.

[Mike Thick]

Haha, A+

So I was thinking about how strange it is that a good old boy state (SC) strongly elected and reelected an African American man (Tim Scott) on a statewide level. And I was absolutely amazed by how he manages to win by big numbers. And I was mulling over on if he could ever be defeated, and I came out with an idea. What if democrats got a near clone to a Trumpian, except on some economic issues, and ran him against Scott? This candidate would be white, somewhat racist, a little openly, and mostly indirectly, and go after Scott, distancing himself from "Real SC values" and not understanding us since he does not even know us and cannot accurately represent "us". Stuff like that. Throw red meat at the base of the opposite party, try to bring back enough SC white votes, and form a coalition to win. Basically, take Scott down with a candidate like Trump, except a democrat, and have a combo of indirect racism, social conservatism, and economic left wing positions, along with being white, to take Scott out of the senate in 2022. Essentially, even if a democrat did this in sc, they likely would not lose much of the african american vote in state, and possibly draw enough sc white voters with his rhetoric to form a winning coalition. What do yall think? Could this work, and is it ethical? I think it is ethical, anything to take down Tim Scott besides violence, that is never ok.

So I was thinking about how strange it is that a good old boy state (SC) strongly elected and reelected an African American man (Tim Scott) on a statewide level. And I was absolutely amazed by how he manages to win by big numbers.

It's almost as if they care more about shared ideology than racial identity. Maybe you should try that.

Hah, good joke! This one really made me laugh! 👍🏽😆.

Well, let's see. In the 2014 midterms Scott and Graham shared a ballot because Scott had to win a special election to finish Jim DeMint's term. Based on your premise Graham should have outperformed him. Not only did that not happen, Scott outperformed him by 7%. Facts and data are not on your side here.

The fact that you find it acceptable to use racism to oust one of the most genuinely good people in politics from office is repugnant. Perhaps it would be better to judge people on their ideas rather than their skin color.

I find Scott repugnant, and I think using anything except violence is ok to take him down.

10/10

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

HP

[Figueira]

I mildly disliked him before, but now that I've seen what he posted recently, I think he's absolutely awful. Sorry you had to deal with that, Peebs.

As an aside, I hate when people who aren't in Congress identify as "Blue Dog Democrats."

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

I mildly disliked him before, but now that I've seen what he posted recently, I think he's absolutely awful. Sorry you had to deal with that, Peebs.

[SWE]

White noise non-entity who randomly revealed himself to be a genuinely terrible person. There's really no excuse to not vote HP here.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

White noise non-entity who randomly revealed himself to be a genuinely terrible person. There's really no excuse to not vote HP here.

this

[TDAS04]

HP.

[West_Midlander]

I think he's absolutely awful. Sorry you had to deal with that, Peebs.

HP

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

If you finks with Peebs you're finksing with all of us. HP.

[Co-Chair Bagel23]

Damn...this site is just brutal.
I always thought he was a nice guy lol

Thank you for your kindness! It goes a long way for me especially after this roasting.