how to solve a difficult problem like Nebraska
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:07:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  About this Site
  Talk Elections Q & A
  How To (Moderator: Virginiá)
  how to solve a difficult problem like Nebraska
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: how to solve a difficult problem like Nebraska  (Read 721 times)
PRESIDENT STANTON
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 676
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 03, 2017, 08:49:26 PM »

To all those who post maps, can anyone solve this problem, if one wants to reduce Nebraska's electoral vote from 5 to 4, is there a way to do it? As Nebraska has there electoral vote allocated by congressional district.
Logged
President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️
Peebs
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,032
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2017, 08:50:48 PM »

Change the year to 1964 and edit it manually.
Logged
PRESIDENT STANTON
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 676
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2017, 09:23:01 PM »

tried that formula, but it wont allow you to manually change the number from 5 to 4, any other state allows it, but not Nebraska
Logged
President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️
Peebs
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,032
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2017, 09:46:42 PM »

Maybe you're doing it wrong. I mean, this code:
Code:
[img]https://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/genusmap.php?year=2016&ev_c=1&pv_p=1&ev_p=1&type=calc&AL=2;9;6&AK=2;3;5&AZ=2;11;4
&AR=2;6;6&CA=1;55;6&CO=1;9;4&CT=1;7;5&DE=1;3;5&DC=1;3;9&FL=2;29;4&GA=2;16;5&HI=1;4;6&ID=2;4;5&IL=1;20;5&IN=2;11;5&IA=2;6;5
&KS=2;6;5&KY=2;8;6&LA=2;8;5&MD=1;10;6&MA=1;11;6&MI=2;16;4&MN=1;10;4&MS=2;6;5&MO=2;10;5&MT=2;3;5&NV=1;6;4&NH=1;4;4&NJ=1;14;5
&NM=1;5;4&NY=1;29;5&NC=2;15;4&ND=2;3;6&OH=2;18;5&OK=2;7;6&OR=1;7;5&PA=2;20;4&RI=1;4;5&SC=2;9;5&SD=2;3;6&TN=2;11;6&TX=2;38;5
&UT=2;6;4&VT=1;3;5&VA=1;13;4&WA=1;12;5&WV=2;5;6&WI=2;10;4&WY=2;3;6&ME=1;2;4&ME1=1;1;5&ME2=2;1;5&NE=2;2;5&NE1=2;1;5&NE2=2;1;4&NE3=2;1;7[/img]
(and removing the enters, of course)
produces this image:

So if you were to change the year (2016) to 1964, you'd get this:

Obviously, you don't want Nebraska and Maine to only have 2 EVs. So you change the second number following "ME" and "NE" to 4 and 5, respectively.

But as you said, you want Nebraska only to have 4 EVS, so change that number to a 4.

Voila.
Logged
PRESIDENT STANTON
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 676
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2017, 05:51:16 AM »

Yep, right on the money! Thanks for that bit of info, handy & good to know, wish that could be accomplished with the congressional allocation, though. Thanks for going to all that trouble, to demonstrate what you were described, much obliged.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2017, 06:29:03 AM »

1968 is the last year that didn't involve congressional districts voting on their own, for the record.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 12 queries.