Adding States Amendment
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:02:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Adding States Amendment
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Adding States Amendment  (Read 3438 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 13, 2005, 10:04:30 PM »

Adding States Amendment
The following clause is added to Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution:

6. The Senate may by law admit new States to the Republic of Atlasia. The Senate may apportion this State to a Region and a District via proper legislation; however, the State shall still be liable to all the provisions of this Section and Section 4 of this Article.


Sponsor: Sen. MasterJedi
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2005, 10:10:07 PM »

This seems very confusing and open to weird interpretations. 

What is a state?  How does a territory become a state?  How does one make a non-territory a state (probably a goal of the author of this amendment)?

Unless I'm missing something, there seems to be problems with this to me.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2005, 10:13:40 PM »
« Edited: August 13, 2005, 10:25:45 PM by Emsworth »

This seems very confusing and open to weird interpretations. 

Not as I see it. I wrote this amendment on Sen. MasterJedi's request (although I do not support it). The U.S. Constitution uses almost exactly the same language:

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union."

The language of the proposed amendment, as you can see, is practically identical, except for the change from passive to active voice. It just allows the Senate to admit new states by law, i.e., by statute, just as the U.S. Congress may do now.

The other part of the Amendment allows the Senate to apportion states to regions and districts, subject to the population rules for the latter.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2005, 10:44:40 PM »

This seems very confusing and open to weird interpretations. 

Not as I see it. I wrote this amendment on Sen. MasterJedi's request (although I do not support it). The U.S. Constitution uses almost exactly the same language:

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union."

The language of the proposed amendment, as you can see, is practically identical, except for the change from passive to active voice. It just allows the Senate to admit new states by law, i.e., by statute, just as the U.S. Congress may do now.

The other part of the Amendment allows the Senate to apportion states to regions and districts, subject to the population rules for the latter.

Fair enough.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2005, 11:05:40 PM »

This is a great bill that we need to move swiftly through the Senate.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2005, 03:08:55 AM »

No questions from me.  Seems pretty sensible for laying the groundwork in case we ever want to admit something as a state.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2005, 06:43:03 AM »

Just to note, the current Constitution already has a clause under which any state that is admitted to the United States is also automatically admitted to Atlasia, without need for Senate action. This would allow the Senate to admit Puerto Rico, etc., even though these have not been admitted by the real-life U.S.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2005, 07:08:43 AM »

Just to note, the current Constitution already has a clause under which any state that is admitted to the United States is also automatically admitted to Atlasia, without need for Senate action. This would allow the Senate to admit Puerto Rico, etc., even though these have not been admitted by the real-life U.S.

That doesn't include Canada which has come up in the past. (Though we can only push for it and hope the Canadians allow for plebescites) And also what if the US doesn't want to admit Puerto Rico or my old Pacifican Statehood Act, what then? This gives Atlasia more power over what we want done.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2005, 08:07:06 AM »

This is just an excuse to admit Canada to our union (completely ridiculous) - there needs to be a check on the power of the Senate to endlessly add new States to our Union in my opinion.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2005, 10:01:42 AM »

This is just an excuse to admit Canada to our union (completely ridiculous) - there needs to be a check on the power of the Senate to endlessly add new States to our Union in my opinion.

Besides the Canadian and Pacifican ones I'm not going to submit anymore bills that would add states. (We own the pacific islands and a majority of the people in the last poll supported Canada).
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2005, 10:22:59 AM »

This is just an excuse to admit Canada to our union (completely ridiculous) - there needs to be a check on the power of the Senate to endlessly add new States to our Union in my opinion.

I urge all Senators to vote against MasterJedis imperalist bill. Masterjedi, why is it that all you have tried to do in the Senate is admit states, such as Puerto Rico, and other Pacific Islands, from which NO ONE in Atlasia is actually from?
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2005, 10:41:23 AM »

just because you don't want to admit any new states now doesn't mean that we may never want to.  This power is a good thing for the senate to have.  Obviously there's no suport to just annex Canada, so the Senate would defeat that.  But if there ever were popular sentiment and need to make a new state, the senate would already have the power.
There is absolutely NO reason to be against this.
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2005, 01:37:55 PM »

Obviously there's no suport to just annex Canada...

...I want to annex Canada. And it isn't really historical annexation, more like a redefinition of Atlasia.

Siege
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2005, 05:57:25 PM »

Why not? My only complaint is that too many socialist provinces might enter Atlasia before they are sufficiently tainted by bourgeious capitalism-consumerism Tongue.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2005, 11:09:25 PM »

For the record, I will oppose this bill as I have opposed all relevant pieces of legislation before that mirror the above.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2005, 09:32:23 AM »

For the record, I will oppose this bill as I have opposed all relevant pieces of legislation before that mirror the above.
that's a silly attitude
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 15, 2005, 09:49:49 AM »

Why not? My only complaint is that too many socialist provinces might enter Atlasia before they are sufficiently tainted by bourgeious capitalism-consumerism Tongue.

I don't really care about that, I mean, sure socialism... that's a bad thing, or so my advisors tell me to say in public, but I really just want to be registered in my home province, not that there's anything wrong with South Carolina, Michigan, Maine, Alabama, or Vermont.

Siege
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2005, 11:16:26 AM »

Why not? My only complaint is that too many socialist provinces might enter Atlasia before they are sufficiently tainted by bourgeious capitalism-consumerism Tongue.

I don't really care about that, I mean, sure socialism... that's a bad thing, or so my advisors tell me to say in public, but I really just want to be registered in my home province, not that there's anything wrong with South Carolina, Michigan, Maine, Alabama, or Vermont.

Siege

In real life that would be a problem but not in Atlasia, we can all sleep easy at night now. Tongue
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 15, 2005, 11:44:07 AM »

For the record, I will oppose this bill as I have opposed all relevant pieces of legislation before that mirror the above.
that's a silly attitude

I'm a silly kind of guy.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 15, 2005, 11:48:04 AM »

For the record, I will oppose this bill as I have opposed all relevant pieces of legislation before that mirror the above.
that's a silly attitude

I'm a silly kind of guy.

And you oppose it after you vote for the admission of Puerto Rico?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 15, 2005, 01:13:30 PM »

For the record, I will oppose this bill as I have opposed all relevant pieces of legislation before that mirror the above.
that's a silly attitude

I'm a silly kind of guy.

And you oppose it after you vote for the admission of Puerto Rico?

Technically, that bill had no provision for there to be a calling of the vote for statehood in Puerto Rico anyway.  That's the reason why I ended up supporting it.  I was quite surprised that John Ford did call a vote.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 16, 2005, 10:04:52 PM »

The question is on final passage of the constitutional amendment. All those in favor, say Aye; those opposed, say No.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 16, 2005, 10:18:44 PM »

Nay.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 16, 2005, 10:23:50 PM »

Aye.  There's nothing inherently imperialistic about this bill.  It just provides the tools to add a new state if we happen to want to do that at a later date.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2005, 06:52:32 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.