Trump Jr./Russian lawyer meeting: Jr. knew info was part of Russian Gov effort
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:32:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Trump Jr./Russian lawyer meeting: Jr. knew info was part of Russian Gov effort
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28
Author Topic: Trump Jr./Russian lawyer meeting: Jr. knew info was part of Russian Gov effort  (Read 35228 times)
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #575 on: July 15, 2017, 11:38:08 AM »

I just don't understand why people like EnglishPete are trying to "win" the discussion here. There is no winning to be had, and nothing you post here will have any impact on anything that happens. It'd be nice if we could have threads that don't get derailed from legitimate discussion about new developments in stories like these, but apparently we can't have that.
Discussing politics on discussion boards like this is a hobby of mine just like it is for you. I'm quite happy engaging in legitimate discussion here, it seems you would prefer if the discussion was one sided. If you think my posts are too partisan I'd point out that my posting is rather less heatedly partisan than posts by people like Proudmoderate2 etc in this thread.

There really isn't another side besides "bothsidez do it!!1" or muh "THIS IS A VAST LEFT WING CONSPIRACY".
I understand that some people, like yourself would prefer not to discuss the issue but prefer to pretend that yours is the only real side to the argument.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,722
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #576 on: July 15, 2017, 12:12:33 PM »


That last line is awfully ironic, given that, when Putin offered to renew the New START Treaty, Trump turned him down.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/09/trump-putin-call-nuclear-deal-new-start-treaty
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #577 on: July 15, 2017, 12:40:07 PM »

EnglishPete is desperate.
When you have someone trying to defend trump jr because jr did not also "mention the furniture in the room or the haircuts of the participants," you know this person is wacked-out of their mind.
There is zero, none, nada of a comparison between the people in a crucial meeting like this and "furniture."

You have got to be insane to even think of this as a defense, yet alone write it down for others to read in black and white.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #578 on: July 15, 2017, 12:51:14 PM »

If you think my posts are too partisan I'd point out that my posting is rather less heatedly partisan than posts by people like Proudmoderate2 etc in this thread.

LOL.
The problem is that you think people view your posts as "too partisan."
You got it all wrong !
It's that your posts are insane, with wacky conspiracy theories. Look at what your posting, you even have images of small square pictures of people, with arrows pointing from one image to another image on how they are interconnected. You do it better (Not!) than Hollywood does, when we go to see a movie on Saturday night.
I'm still waiting for you to post another wacky story, on how little green people from Mars also conspired to trick trump jr to this meeting. Can we have that one also ?
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #579 on: July 15, 2017, 02:43:06 PM »

Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,671


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #580 on: July 15, 2017, 02:44:56 PM »


#17 seems particularly on point here.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #581 on: July 15, 2017, 02:56:48 PM »


My favorite is #21.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,852


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #582 on: July 15, 2017, 03:00:35 PM »


This is a thing of beauty.

'What about Chappaquiddick' as every fifth response or so is just genius.

Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #583 on: July 15, 2017, 03:55:03 PM »

We need a Nixon Impeachment thread so I can go full EnglishPete. I keep wanting to argue that Nixon's impeachment was a real witch hunt by Tip O'Neill and his Democratic gang but keep feeling the thread isn't the right place for it. OTOH, it might not be the wisest thing to demonstrate my rabid Nixon bonafides.

Eh, it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

As you were.

Go for it. History board is open for that sort of thing.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #584 on: July 15, 2017, 05:05:39 PM »

We need a Nixon Impeachment thread so I can go full EnglishPete. I keep wanting to argue that Nixon's impeachment was a real witch hunt by Tip O'Neill and his Democratic gang but keep feeling the thread isn't the right place for it. OTOH, it might not be the wisest thing to demonstrate my rabid Nixon bonafides.

Eh, it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

As you were.

Go for it. History board is open for that sort of thing.


Especially since it was a witch hunt since Nixon's main problem was Bobby's crash at Chappaquiddick denied him the chance to beat a Kennedy for a change.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,671


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #585 on: July 15, 2017, 05:13:09 PM »

We need a Nixon Impeachment thread so I can go full EnglishPete. I keep wanting to argue that Nixon's impeachment was a real witch hunt by Tip O'Neill and his Democratic gang but keep feeling the thread isn't the right place for it. OTOH, it might not be the wisest thing to demonstrate my rabid Nixon bonafides.

Eh, it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

As you were.

Go for it. History board is open for that sort of thing.


Especially since it was a witch hunt since Nixon's main problem was Bobby's crash at Chappaquiddick denied him the chance to beat a Kennedy for a change.

Teddy, not Bobby.  I actually have a newspaper that I saved from Apollo 11's landing on the moon (July 20, 1969) and it has a tiny article on the front page talking about Sen. Kennedy being involved in a car accident at Chappaquiddick.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #586 on: July 15, 2017, 07:54:01 PM »

Also, I would advise checking this out, it's a great read. Here are the main points with more details found in the article.

Lawfare's Seven Theories of Trump/Russia Collusion

#1: It’s All a Giant Set of Coincidences and Disconnected Events

#2: Trump Attracted Russophiles

#3: The Russian Operation Wasn’t Really About Trump at All

#4: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—But Trump Didn’t Know

#5: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—And Trump Knew or Should Have Known

#6: Kompromat

#7: The President of the United States is a Russian Agent

https://www.lawfareblog.com/seven-theories-case-what-do-we-really-know-about-laffaire-russe-and-what-could-it-all-mean
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,671


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #587 on: July 15, 2017, 08:01:04 PM »

Also, I would advise checking this out, it's a great read. Here are the main points with more details found in the article.

Lawfare's Seven Theories of Trump/Russia Collusion

#1: It’s All a Giant Set of Coincidences and Disconnected Events

#2: Trump Attracted Russophiles

#3: The Russian Operation Wasn’t Really About Trump at All

#4: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—But Trump Didn’t Know

#5: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—And Trump Knew or Should Have Known

#6: Kompromat

#7: The President of the United States is a Russian Agent

https://www.lawfareblog.com/seven-theories-case-what-do-we-really-know-about-laffaire-russe-and-what-could-it-all-mean

That's the best article I've seen yet on this affair.  Thanks for posting the link.  IMO #4 and #5 seem like the most plausible.
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #588 on: July 15, 2017, 08:35:23 PM »

We need a Nixon Impeachment thread so I can go full EnglishPete. I keep wanting to argue that Nixon's impeachment was a real witch hunt by Tip O'Neill and his Democratic gang but keep feeling the thread isn't the right place for it. OTOH, it might not be the wisest thing to demonstrate my rabid Nixon bonafides.

Eh, it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

As you were.


February 07, 1974 09:08:03 am »   

Nixon has managed to end another Democrat war with honor and dignity. He completely crushed the acid, amnesty and abortion lunatic McGovern a few years ago as well. The heartland stands with Nixon against this nasty Liberal smear campaign. Time will prove Nixon was in the right. His honesty and integrity knows no bounds. The Democrats are too busy cozying up to Communists to support the commander in chief. It is very sad to see the Democrats and Liberals buying into these weird conspiracy theories. Harry Truman would be rolling in his grave folks.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,930
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #589 on: July 15, 2017, 08:53:52 PM »

Classy of you to put so much effort into mocking other posters.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #590 on: July 15, 2017, 08:55:45 PM »

We need a Nixon Impeachment thread so I can go full EnglishPete. I keep wanting to argue that Nixon's impeachment was a real witch hunt by Tip O'Neill and his Democratic gang but keep feeling the thread isn't the right place for it. OTOH, it might not be the wisest thing to demonstrate my rabid Nixon bonafides.

Eh, it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

As you were.

Go for it. History board is open for that sort of thing.


Especially since it was a witch hunt since Nixon's main problem was Bobby's crash at Chappaquiddick denied him the chance to beat a Kennedy for a change.

Teddy, not Bobby.  I actually have a newspaper that I saved from Apollo 11's landing on the moon (July 20, 1969) and it has a tiny article on the front page talking about Sen. Kennedy being involved in a car accident at Chappaquiddick.

Ah.  I forgot that it isn't common knowledge that Bobby and Teddy traded places and faces in an attempt to save him from the mafia that killed their brother.  Of course, when the mafia got him they decided it would be better to ruin Bobby's chances to succeed his brother.  Perhaps if Jack hadn't died when his PT boat was sunk by the Amagiri, the four Kennedy brothers, Joe Jr., Jack, Bobby, and Teddy, would have amounted to something more than a part term presidency for Joe Jr.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,887
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #591 on: July 15, 2017, 08:59:12 PM »

I mean that's all well and good, but what it tells me is maybe that we need to start booting more presidents out of office to establish an unambiguous message that corruption will not be tolerated. I'm willing to tolerate some shenanigans from both sides (not that I'd be happy with it or wouldn't want a censure perhaps in some cases), but I absolutely 100% draw the line when it comes to monkeying with our elections. If you feel you need to suppress voting by the opposition, break into your opponent's offices to steal documents and bug phones, do extensive GOTV in cemeteries and/or reach out to foreign adversaries for opposition research and smear campaigns, then you should never hold political office, nor should such crimes go unpunished.
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #592 on: July 16, 2017, 02:35:12 AM »

Also, I would advise checking this out, it's a great read. Here are the main points with more details found in the article.

Lawfare's Seven Theories of Trump/Russia Collusion

#1: It’s All a Giant Set of Coincidences and Disconnected Events

#2: Trump Attracted Russophiles

#3: The Russian Operation Wasn’t Really About Trump at All

#4: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—But Trump Didn’t Know

#5: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—And Trump Knew or Should Have Known

#6: Kompromat

#7: The President of the United States is a Russian Agent

https://www.lawfareblog.com/seven-theories-case-what-do-we-really-know-about-laffaire-russe-and-what-could-it-all-mean

Or how about #8 it never happened. Lets have a look at the article

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This claim is based on the Crowdstrike report. The FBI and the CIA have declared that they are happy to take Crowdstrike's word for it without checking the DNC servers themselves. However Crowdstrike have a history of making fictional claims of this kind and the DBC's refusal to allow the FBI or the NSA to check the servers to confirm for themselves renders their entire claim even more suspect.

Notice that for about a year now proponents of the Trump/Russian hacking conspiracy theory have avoided entirely arguing for this claim on the basis of the evidence. Instead they have made a shibboleth of the claim, loudly demanding that everyone affirm their faith in this claim and accusing them of being unpatriotic if they do.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This isn't true either. Lets have a look at their examples.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Talking with the Ambassador was part of his job at the time, although this was spun into a big scandal

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
And? What has that got to do with Russia?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
So firstly yes, Page was "never part of the Trump inner circle". As for his connections being "serious enough for the FISA Court to issue a warrant" the Administration of the time was looking for any excuse to snoop on the Trump campaign any anyone who might be associated with it. They wouldn't need much of an excuse to request a warrant and the FISA court rarely refuses a request.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Hooray, finally we get to a senior campaign figure with real substantial links to Russia. What did he do?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nope that's fake news from the Jeff Bezos Blog, there was no such 'stripping of language' from the platform.

And that's it. So the most likely explanation of this article's "constellation of facts" is  #8 that in reality they're not facts but bullsh**t. Certainly makes more sense than 1-7.
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,042


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #593 on: July 16, 2017, 06:20:29 AM »

EnglishPete's posts are a really sad insight into mental illness
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,455


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #594 on: July 16, 2017, 09:33:54 AM »

Also, I would advise checking this out, it's a great read. Here are the main points with more details found in the article.

Lawfare's Seven Theories of Trump/Russia Collusion

#1: It’s All a Giant Set of Coincidences and Disconnected Events

#2: Trump Attracted Russophiles

#3: The Russian Operation Wasn’t Really About Trump at All

#4: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—But Trump Didn’t Know

#5: Russian Intelligence Actively Penetrated the Trump Campaign—And Trump Knew or Should Have Known

#6: Kompromat

#7: The President of the United States is a Russian Agent

https://www.lawfareblog.com/seven-theories-case-what-do-we-really-know-about-laffaire-russe-and-what-could-it-all-mean

That's the best article I've seen yet on this affair.  Thanks for posting the link.  IMO #4 and #5 seem like the most plausible.

Looks like it leaves out my most likely scenario: Trump has been dealing with shady Russian money for decades, and whatever (if anything) happened is tied to that. It may just be that he doesn't want all those dealing to come to light.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #595 on: July 16, 2017, 10:25:14 PM »

Even trump's own attorney is trying to lie their way-out of this mess.
But, they were caught red-handed with their bs ....  just like Little donny jr ....

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #596 on: July 16, 2017, 11:27:35 PM »

The orange-haired clown is at it again.
He just cant seem to control himself with his Tweets.
These are from Sunday :

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,367
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #597 on: July 16, 2017, 11:46:44 PM »

The orange-haired clown is at it again.
He just cant seem to control himself with his Tweets.
These are from Sunday :

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
What a b*tch
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,455


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #598 on: July 17, 2017, 01:23:46 AM »

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/342225-trump-lawyer-secret-service-wouldnt-let-trump-jr-take-nefarious
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/16/politics/donald-trump-jr-jay-sekulow-secret-service/index.html
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So.... Trump's lawyer says the Secret Service screened the meeting. The Secret Service says they were only protecting Trump. There's one way both of those can be true.
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,367
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #599 on: July 17, 2017, 02:18:30 AM »

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/342225-trump-lawyer-secret-service-wouldnt-let-trump-jr-take-nefarious
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/16/politics/donald-trump-jr-jay-sekulow-secret-service/index.html
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So.... Trump's lawyer says the Secret Service screened the meeting. The Secret Service says they were only protecting Trump. There's one way both of those can be true.
I thing people are reading too much into that. I'm pretty sure Sekulow was just trying to act like SS are bodyguards who would be at the Trump Tower lobby room letting people in, in order to trick stupid people at home to raise doubts
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 12 queries.