I loved all of them, but I'd drop geography.
Economics, if you're talking about the same one I had to take. It was mostly macroeconomics, which most don't need to know unless their desired profession is an economist (which was in no way mine).
We did both. The first semester was about hard and soft location factors, later we continued with accountancy and basics of fiscal law. Then we were taught macroeconomics.
That was a separate subject at our school (Management and Organisation). Economics in the fifth and sixth high school mainly was microeconomics (marginal costs, price elasticity, game theory, external effects, etc) and macroecnomics (expenditure approach, Keynes vs Classics, very basic monetary theory). Management and Organisation dealth with investment selection (cash flows), accounting and things like that. I probably was slightly better at M&O (I totally aced the exam) but I preferred economics (which I also aced
).
I also loved history. I liked geography, but not as much as the other subjects (and I wasn't really interested in physical geography which was half of our exam).