Atlas Throwback: October, 1963
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:59:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games (Moderator: Dereich)
  Atlas Throwback: October, 1963
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Atlas Throwback: October, 1963  (Read 600 times)
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 31, 2017, 08:55:24 PM »
« edited: August 11, 2017, 03:04:55 AM by Thunderbird is the word »

In October, 1963 what would atlas users say about the 1964 election?

I think the election will likely pit Kennedy against Rockefeller and Kennedy will probably win an easy victory. What's really interesting to me is what will happen in the south. With Jack coming out in favor of civil rights I wonder if we'll get another Strom Thurmond like candidacy. That could make the race interesting if they do succeed in winning enough states to flip the race to the house. Also remains to be seen what effect the situation in French Indochina could have if it heats up.  
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2017, 10:14:19 PM »

I hope Kennedy drops Johnson. He's awful. As for who would take his place, I wouldn't object to Symington or Meyner.

If it ends up being Rockefeller against Kennedy, I think I'd have to vote for Rockefeller. Although, with my track record of voting since 1936, I doubt he'd win.
Logged
GoTfan
GoTfan21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,698
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2017, 05:21:30 AM »

I seriously doubt Johnson is going anywhere . . . He's far too valuable, especially if Kennedy wants to push for civil rights laws.
Logged
Jaguar4life
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,598
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2017, 02:36:17 PM »

Johnson total flip flopper. SAD!
Logged
TheSaint250
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,073


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: 5.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2017, 01:17:33 PM »

One thing I can agree with Kennedy on is civil rights. Johnson has never shown a willingness to do so. He needs to go.

If he does, who will Kennedy replace him with?
Logged
GoTfan
GoTfan21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,698
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2017, 06:13:43 PM »

One thing I can agree with Kennedy on is civil rights. Johnson has never shown a willingness to do so. He needs to go.

If he does, who will Kennedy replace him with?

I find it unlikely that Kennedy will replace him. He needs Johnson to hold the south, and no Democrat can win without the south.  Either that, or he has to with someone like Russell or Thurmond, and we can all agree they would be worse.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2017, 04:08:00 PM »

One thing I can agree with Kennedy on is civil rights. Johnson has never shown a willingness to do so. He needs to go.

If he does, who will Kennedy replace him with?

I find it unlikely that Kennedy will replace him. He needs Johnson to hold the south, and no Democrat can win without the south.  Either that, or he has to with someone like Russell or Thurmond, and we can all agree they would be worse.

He could pick Connally, Shivers, or an old timer like Coke Stevenson. Johnson isn't popular, but he controls the machines and many politicians. It would take a United front between Sanford, Smathers, Symington, Shriver, as well as Robert Kennedy, Pat Brown, and the other Northern and Western Democratic leaders. For now, the combined support of Sanford, Smathers, and Symington is almost assured - they're staunch Kennedy allies.

As for Johnson on civil rights, I'm sure he would pass it, if only because he's the biggest opportunist in politics, which says a lot.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.