1960 Eisenhower vs. Kennedy (no 22nd amendment)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:44:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1960 Eisenhower vs. Kennedy (no 22nd amendment)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1960 Eisenhower vs. Kennedy (no 22nd amendment)  (Read 705 times)
MR DARK BRANDON
Liam
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,188
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -0.65, S: -1.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 07, 2017, 07:29:25 PM »
« edited: August 07, 2017, 07:34:06 PM by President '91 »

Discuss with maps.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2017, 12:32:23 PM »

Why would Ike go for a third term?  Some sort of international crisis? 
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2017, 12:50:52 PM »

he seems like the type to retire after 2 even if gauanteed to win again
Logged
The Govanah Jake
Jake Jewvinivisk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,234


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2017, 01:42:11 PM »



Assuming that Ike's Health Problems are less Severe, there is no 22, and he actually wants to run again for some reason then I could see this come into fruition. Ike was a very popular president and even though JFK would put up a fight, everybody likes Ike so he wins comfortably but it is no 1952/56 type margin. JFK does better in all regions slightly though heavily better in the south with Ike being much more moderate (and wouldn't be held so highly after his integration attempts by the white establishment) then Nixon and probally would never try to appeal to white southerners like Nixon did so loses some ground from 1952/56 though still wins most of the Upper South and Texas. Though if this really happened then i would see a southern third party rise.

Dwight Eisenhower - 351 52.02%

John F. Kennedy - 186 46.48%
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2017, 01:58:38 PM »

wasn't really a matter of Nixon trying to make any special appeal to the South in 1960 so much just the fact as him going up against a Catholic from New England.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.