8th Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Planned Parenthood
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:10:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  8th Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Planned Parenthood
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Planned Parenthood  (Read 2431 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,752


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2017, 02:10:36 PM »

Great ruling , no organization is entitled to receiving tax payer money. 
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2017, 02:15:42 PM »

We have dozens of laws on the books that are as hard, if not harder, to enforce than an abortion ban would be. There are other first world countries with such bans.

Name one.

Malta

That wasn't the question..Roll Eyes
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2017, 04:29:34 PM »

Yes, let us cheer for reduced funding for cancer screenings and STD treatment.

PP performs less than 2% of the nation's cancer screenings for women.

How many organizations or hospitals perform a larger share than that? I bet it's few
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 18, 2017, 04:51:34 PM »

I hope Arkansas likes more abortions!
Logged
Coraxion
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 906
Ethiopia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 18, 2017, 05:26:04 PM »

LOL
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 18, 2017, 10:08:43 PM »


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cIgSTjzrmRg
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 19, 2017, 08:11:26 AM »

We have dozens of laws on the books that are as hard, if not harder, to enforce than an abortion ban would be. There are other first world countries with such bans.

Name one.

South Korea, Japan, Chile, Finland, United Kingdom, Poland and Parts of Australia
IThat is a broad definition of "illegal". In almost all those examples, its an administrative issue, not a criminal one. "Pro-Voice" than pro life or choice. I think in Poland you have to prove a particular dire need and there are no abortions in Chile (I heard almost every girl in jail is on jail for that there), but in the rest you just have to prove a substantial or demonstrable need to a second doctor or hospital that you need one. I think that would be a good post-Roe compromise.

I mean a law. Name one law that causes more problems.

Rape is probably a good example these days, as are the drinking age and drug prohibition. Simple things like tax evasion of purchases on the internet are almost certainly harder to enforce as well. I fail to see why abortion laws are supposedly uniquely unenforceable.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 19, 2017, 10:02:31 AM »

We have dozens of laws on the books that are as hard, if not harder, to enforce than an abortion ban would be. There are other first world countries with such bans.

Name one.

South Korea, Japan, Chile, Finland, United Kingdom, Poland and Parts of Australia
IThat is a broad definition of "illegal". In almost all those examples, its an administrative issue, not a criminal one. "Pro-Voice" than pro life or choice. I think in Poland you have to prove a particular dire need and there are no abortions in Chile (I heard almost every girl in jail is on jail for that there), but in the rest you just have to prove a substantial or demonstrable need to a second doctor or hospital that you need one. I think that would be a good post-Roe compromise.

I mean a law. Name one law that causes more problems.

Rape is probably a good example these days, as are the drinking age and drug prohibition. Simple things like tax evasion of purchases on the internet are almost certainly harder to enforce as well. I fail to see why abortion laws are supposedly uniquely unenforceable.

How's pot prohibition working out?
Anyways, with abortion, you have to prove the "victim" actually existed in the first place. In many third world countries, a lot of the time, they just get around it by saying they were having "regularity" problems.

Logged
IceAgeComing
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,564
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: August 20, 2017, 04:41:42 AM »

We have dozens of laws on the books that are as hard, if not harder, to enforce than an abortion ban would be. There are other first world countries with such bans.

Name one.

...United Kingdom...

news to me
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.