Abortion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 08:47:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Abortion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 28
Author Topic: Abortion  (Read 59829 times)
PD
pd
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 633


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: January 08, 2004, 05:33:10 PM »

I could use more choice words, but I consider you a murderer of the human spirit, willing to crush the hopes of those in the most desparate straits. Let's face it, you're just not a nice person.
Let's face it, you're weird and immoral.
He's wierd!  Great comeback line, PD!
Yep. He is pretty weird. Someone who would betray his country's founding form of government is pretty wierd.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: January 08, 2004, 05:34:52 PM »

I could use more choice words, but I consider you a murderer of the human spirit, willing to crush the hopes of those in the most desparate straits. Let's face it, you're just not a nice person.
Let's face it, you're weird and immoral.
He's wierd!  Great comeback line, PD!
Yep. He is pretty weird. Someone who would betray his country's founding form of government is pretty wierd.

Not if he disagrees with it. It is notmore weird than thinking feminists want to murder children and destroy capitalism.
Logged
PD
pd
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 633


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: January 08, 2004, 05:36:04 PM »

I could use more choice words, but I consider you a murderer of the human spirit, willing to crush the hopes of those in the most desparate straits. Let's face it, you're just not a nice person.
Let's face it, you're weird and immoral.
He's wierd!  Great comeback line, PD!
Yep. He is pretty weird. Someone who would betray his country's founding form of government is pretty wierd.

Not if he disagrees with it. It is notmore weird than thinking feminists want to murder children and destroy capitalism.
What's wierd about believing something that's true.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: January 08, 2004, 05:39:01 PM »

I could use more choice words, but I consider you a murderer of the human spirit, willing to crush the hopes of those in the most desparate straits. Let's face it, you're just not a nice person.
Let's face it, you're weird and immoral.
He's wierd!  Great comeback line, PD!
Yep. He is pretty weird. Someone who would betray his country's founding form of government is pretty wierd.

Not if he disagrees with it. It is notmore weird than thinking feminists want to murder children and destroy capitalism.
What's wierd about believing something that's true.

Where on earth do you get these ideas? "destroy capitalism". What do you get that from? It is illogical and insane.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: January 08, 2004, 05:42:04 PM »

Feminists are about treatment not based on gender. There is still a substantial gap in poverty, income, leadership, double standards, and visibility between the genders. Its good that feminists are trying to address these things.
Logged
migrendel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,672
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: January 08, 2004, 07:47:06 PM »

I'm not betraying my founding form of government. I believe I'm standing foursquare behind the text of the Constitution. I think you might think you're defending the Constitution, but I think you're misguided.
Logged
PD
pd
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 633


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: January 09, 2004, 12:22:24 AM »

I'm not betraying my founding form of government. I believe I'm standing foursquare behind the text of the Constitution. I think you might think you're defending the Constitution, but I think you're misguided.
I guarantee you this: we weren't founded as a Socialist Republic.
Logged
PD
pd
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 633


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: January 09, 2004, 12:30:40 AM »

Feminists are about treatment not based on gender. There is still a substantial gap in poverty, income, leadership, double standards, and visibility between the genders. Its good that feminists are trying to address these things.
The only thing feminists are trying to adress is that women are better than men and that men are worthless, weak pigs. That's all. I'm not saying that I think women shouldn't vote or have jobs, what I'm saying is that women should not neglect their natural duty to families. It is a proven fact that most men work harder, career-wise, and are more able to do hard work. This is like saying that women would be excellent football players. Feminists would rather use a dildo than get married to a real man and start a family. They see children as a waste of time, things that get in the way of their constant, neverending boyfriends that they screw one night and abandon the next. One feminist said that it should be a woman's right to choose whether she wants to have a child without the father there. That's bullsh**t!  
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: January 09, 2004, 09:45:12 AM »

Feminists are about treatment not based on gender. There is still a substantial gap in poverty, income, leadership, double standards, and visibility between the genders. Its good that feminists are trying to address these things.
The only thing feminists are trying to adress is that women are better than men and that men are worthless, weak pigs. That's all. I'm not saying that I think women shouldn't vote or have jobs, what I'm saying is that women should not neglect their natural duty to families. It is a proven fact that most men work harder, career-wise, and are more able to do hard work. This is like saying that women would be excellent football players. Feminists would rather use a dildo than get married to a real man and start a family. They see children as a waste of time, things that get in the way of their constant, neverending boyfriends that they screw one night and abandon the next. One feminist said that it should be a woman's right to choose whether she wants to have a child without the father there. That's bullsh**t!  

So you think that every woman should have to assume their "natural duty to families", b/c "it is a proven fact that men work harder, career-wise"? Has it crossed your mind that this might be b/c men choose that path, not that they are naturally inclined to do so? IQ tests have shown that blacks generally have slightly lower intelligence than whites, should they then do menial labour? Feminism is fundamentally about gender equality, not destroying capitalism, or any of the other stupid accusations you come with. You have no idea what you're talking about, sory if you're offended, but someone has to break it to you. These comments on women's rights are just way out there.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: January 09, 2004, 04:09:04 PM »

I'm not betraying my founding form of government. I believe I'm standing foursquare behind the text of the Constitution. I think you might think you're defending the Constitution, but I think you're misguided.
I guarantee you this: we weren't founded as a Socialist Republic.
But we were founded as a Republic believing in free speech.  Migrendel can be a socialist, because of the first (and least controversial) amendment.

We have had 2 socialist presidents, arguably, TR and FDR.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: January 09, 2004, 04:44:53 PM »

I'm not betraying my founding form of government. I believe I'm standing foursquare behind the text of the Constitution. I think you might think you're defending the Constitution, but I think you're misguided.
I guarantee you this: we weren't founded as a Socialist Republic.
But we were founded as a Republic believing in free speech.  Migrendel can be a socialist, because of the first (and least controversial) amendment.

We have had 2 socialist presidents, arguably, TR and FDR.

Can TR be said to have been a socialist? FDR was essentially a social democrat, but I could agree to call him a moderate socialist.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: January 09, 2004, 06:46:23 PM »

TR favored the government haing a part in ownership of most everything, which is a socialist principle.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: January 09, 2004, 06:54:17 PM »

TR favored the government haing a part in ownership of most everything, which is a socialist principle.

Yes, but was he in favor of social equality at all? Otherwise he would be more of a fascist, I'd say! Smiley
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: January 09, 2004, 06:55:39 PM »

TR favored the government haing a part in ownership of most everything, which is a socialist principle.

Yes, but was he in favor of social equality at all? Otherwise he would be more of a fascist, I'd say! Smiley
How about we settle by calling TR a "Social-oriented Progressive".  Sound good?
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: January 09, 2004, 06:57:39 PM »

TR favored the government haing a part in ownership of most everything, which is a socialist principle.

Yes, but was he in favor of social equality at all? Otherwise he would be more of a fascist, I'd say! Smiley
How about we settle by calling TR a "Social-oriented Progressive".  Sound good?

Lol, I hardly know what that means... Sad
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: January 09, 2004, 06:59:58 PM »

Progressives were anti-big business monopolies and were strong in the first quarter of the 20th century.  Presidents Taft, Roosevelt, and McKinley were Progressives.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: January 09, 2004, 07:01:42 PM »

Progressives were anti-big business monopolies and were strong in the first quarter of the 20th century.  Presidents Taft, Roosevelt, and McKinley were Progressives.

OK, then we'll call him that, I guess...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: January 09, 2004, 07:04:46 PM »

Good then.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: January 11, 2004, 05:09:50 PM »

Feminists are about treatment not based on gender. There is still a substantial gap in poverty, income, leadership, double standards, and visibility between the genders. Its good that feminists are trying to address these things.
The only thing feminists are trying to adress is that women are better than men and that men are worthless, weak pigs. That's all. I'm not saying that I think women shouldn't vote or have jobs, what I'm saying is that women should not neglect their natural duty to families. It is a proven fact that most men work harder, career-wise, and are more able to do hard work. This is like saying that women would be excellent football players. Feminists would rather use a dildo than get married to a real man and start a family. They see children as a waste of time, things that get in the way of their constant, neverending boyfriends that they screw one night and abandon the next. One feminist said that it should be a woman's right to choose whether she wants to have a child without the father there. That's bullsh**t!  

So you think that every woman should have to assume their "natural duty to families", b/c "it is a proven fact that men work harder, career-wise"? Has it crossed your mind that this might be b/c men choose that path, not that they are naturally inclined to do so? IQ tests have shown that blacks generally have slightly lower intelligence than whites, should they then do menial labour? Feminism is fundamentally about gender equality, not destroying capitalism, or any of the other stupid accusations you come with. You have no idea what you're talking about, sory if you're offended, but someone has to break it to you. These comments on women's rights are just way out there.

Gustaf, my understanding is Sweden is very good with women's rights. Is this true? If so, what ways does it differ with the U.S. with regards to women's rights?
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: January 11, 2004, 06:40:41 PM »

im pro choice
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: January 12, 2004, 05:11:45 AM »

I am also pro-choice, but personally I am against Abortion in principle.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: January 12, 2004, 01:48:37 PM »

Feminists are about treatment not based on gender. There is still a substantial gap in poverty, income, leadership, double standards, and visibility between the genders. Its good that feminists are trying to address these things.
The only thing feminists are trying to adress is that women are better than men and that men are worthless, weak pigs. That's all. I'm not saying that I think women shouldn't vote or have jobs, what I'm saying is that women should not neglect their natural duty to families. It is a proven fact that most men work harder, career-wise, and are more able to do hard work. This is like saying that women would be excellent football players. Feminists would rather use a dildo than get married to a real man and start a family. They see children as a waste of time, things that get in the way of their constant, neverending boyfriends that they screw one night and abandon the next. One feminist said that it should be a woman's right to choose whether she wants to have a child without the father there. That's bullsh**t!  

So you think that every woman should have to assume their "natural duty to families", b/c "it is a proven fact that men work harder, career-wise"? Has it crossed your mind that this might be b/c men choose that path, not that they are naturally inclined to do so? IQ tests have shown that blacks generally have slightly lower intelligence than whites, should they then do menial labour? Feminism is fundamentally about gender equality, not destroying capitalism, or any of the other stupid accusations you come with. You have no idea what you're talking about, sory if you're offended, but someone has to break it to you. These comments on women's rights are just way out there.

Gustaf, my understanding is Sweden is very good with women's rights. Is this true? If so, what ways does it differ with the U.S. with regards to women's rights?

Well, we are very PC, modern and non-secular. Swedes are nice people who want to please everyone and do the right thing. So we are sensitive to women's rights, half the cabinet members are women, for example, a tradition introduced roughly a decade ago by a Labour PM. We also have certain laws on forcing men to take part of the parent leave (or whatever you call it in English, I don't know the exact term) and so on. Still, we're not close to gender equality or anything, the main difference is in the attitude towards women which is very tolerant in Sweden. I am not an expert in the field, though, I honestly haven't taken that much interest in gender issues.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: January 12, 2004, 04:46:39 PM »

I am also pro-choice, but personally I am against Abortion in principle.
You jump around on this issue.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: January 12, 2004, 04:54:21 PM »

sounds like the position only a politician could love Smiley


I am also pro-choice, but personally I am against Abortion in principle.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: January 14, 2004, 10:09:11 PM »

U.S. Abortion rights supporters:

Just wondering, is everyone familiar with the March for Choice/ March for Women's Lives ?

Washington, D.C.  April 25

http://www.marchforwomen.org/

Largest pro-choice rally since '92
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 28  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 12 queries.