US-SEN 2020: Which seats should Democrats go after? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:03:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  US-SEN 2020: Which seats should Democrats go after? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Choose states
#1
Alaska
 
#2
Colorado
 
#3
Georgia
 
#4
Iowa
 
#5
Maine
 
#6
Montana
 
#7
North Carolina
 
#8
South Carolina
 
#9
Texas
 
#10
West Virginia
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 108

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: US-SEN 2020: Which seats should Democrats go after?  (Read 5204 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


« on: August 21, 2017, 06:57:21 AM »

This just makes me realize how poor the map is for 2020, for the democrats. Although I suppose the GOP would have thought the same looking at 2016, and the reality now seems to be that the national mood can pull up very very strange results.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2017, 04:58:22 PM »

Okay come on guys Mitch McConnell isn't Jack Kennedy
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2017, 03:08:11 PM »

Okay come on guys Mitch McConnell isn't Jack Kennedy

Jack Kennedy never faced the competition McConnell did.

Henry Cabot Lodge would disagree.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2017, 11:21:11 AM »

Okay come on guys Mitch McConnell isn't Jack Kennedy

Jack Kennedy never faced the competition McConnell did.

Henry Cabot Lodge would disagree.

and? If you think about it JFK won 2 competitive races in his entire career.

But you were wrong to claim that JFK never faced the competition that Mitch did; won a senate seat against the most famous family in Massachusetts, in a year when Eisenhower carried the state, then won the nomination of the party despite facing the previous nominee and the Senate Majority Leader at the convention, and then beat the sitting Vice-President during a relatively peace and prosperous time.

My entire point is that yes Mitch is a good campaigner, and has come back from bad odds but he's not the best political campaigner in the last 100 years as some people are claiming.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.