Is this violating public accomondation codes? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 01:35:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Is this violating public accomondation codes? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Question below
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 10

Author Topic: Is this violating public accomondation codes?  (Read 323 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: August 20, 2017, 08:20:33 AM »

While it may be the same phone physically on the outside, it probably can't use AT&T's frequency bands. Indeed that would be true for any Chinese phone on any U.S. (or European) carrier unless it was a more expensive global phone able to support the networks in multiple regions.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2017, 05:34:30 PM »

Edit: It's a phone purchased in China, not a phone made by a Chinese company. It's the exact same model of the same phone sold in the USA.
Just because it's the same model doesn't mean it can access the same frequency bands. China, North America, and Europe all use different frequency bands.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.