Democratic primary map

[Anzeigenhauptmeister]

The Democratic primary maps 0f 2008 and 2012 basically looked the same. The only real difference is the change between candidate A and candidate B, like a photographic negative.

Will 2020's Democratic primary map look much different, or will it basically stay the same?

[NYSforKennedy2024]

Messy current projection because why not.

Link: https://imgur.com/a/gORor

[Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner]

Messy current projection because why not.

Link: https://imgur.com/a/gORor

Jeez, that's a nightmare of a map. From that, I'd guess

Gabbard: 14.8% (12.6% of delegates)
Gillibrand: 23.5% (31.6% of delegates)
Harris: 20.3% (24.8% of delegates)
Castro: 15.5% (14.3% of delegates)
Warren: 13.2% (9.0% of delegates)
Booker: 12.7% (7.9% of delegates)

[NYSforKennedy2024]

Messy current projection because why not.

Link: https://imgur.com/a/gORor

Jeez, that's a nightmare of a map. From that, I'd guess

Gabbard: 14.8% (12.6% of delegates)
Gillibrand: 23.5% (31.6% of delegates)
Harris: 20.3% (24.8% of delegates)
Castro: 15.5% (14.3% of delegates)
Warren: 13.2% (9.0% of delegates)
Booker: 12.7% (7.9% of delegates)

I think it'll be a nightmare of a primary. Not to mention the fact I think 10 more candidates, easily, can run. Throw Delaney, Kander, Merkely, Kaine, and a few more in the mix - it'd be chaotic. Would not be shocked if they break the GOP record of 17.

By the way - how do you create/comment one of the normal maps on this forum?

[Holmes]

Castro doesn't win Oklahoma. lmao

[bilaps]

Messy current projection because why not.

Link: https://imgur.com/a/gORor

MN would surely go to a person like Gabbard od Warren

[Mr. Morden]

Messy current projection because why not.

Link: https://imgur.com/a/gORor

We're not going to have five different candidates winning four or more states.  That never happens.  At most, three candidates will win multiple states.  People always say that it'll be a messy 4- or 5-way split, but the media attention always coalesces on a handful of leading candidates, and the 5th place and below candidates aren't able to get any media oxygen.  Many pundits predicted a similar mess in the crowded 2008, 2012, and 2016 GOP races, but in all three cases there were no more than three candidates who were able to win more than one state.

[The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow]

Messy current projection because why not.

Link: https://imgur.com/a/gORor

Jeez, that's a nightmare of a map. From that, I'd guess

Gabbard: 14.8% (12.6% of delegates)
Gillibrand: 23.5% (31.6% of delegates)
Harris: 20.3% (24.8% of delegates)
Castro: 15.5% (14.3% of delegates)
Warren: 13.2% (9.0% of delegates)
Booker: 12.7% (7.9% of delegates)

I think it'll be a nightmare of a primary. Not to mention the fact I think 10 more candidates, easily, can run. Throw Delaney, Kander, Merkely, Kaine, and a few more in the mix - it'd be chaotic. Would not be shocked if they break the GOP record of 17.

By the way - how do you create/comment one of the normal maps on this forum?

Why would Harris win VT instead of Gabbard or Warren, why would Warren win VA, and why would Gabbard win PA?