Are "No Cursing" laws unconstitutional?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 02:04:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  Are "No Cursing" laws unconstitutional?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Are "No Cursing" laws unconstitutional?  (Read 17679 times)
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 27, 2005, 11:30:19 AM »
« edited: August 27, 2005, 01:42:00 PM by nickshepDEM »

Im asking because... I was recently in VA Beach visiting a friend stationed at the Naval base in Norfolk.  We made a couple trips to VA Beach and I saw numerous "No Cursing" signs.  He said that they actually enforce these laws.  Is this unconstitutional?

Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2005, 12:13:53 PM »

Yes, it is certainly unconstitutional. Blanket bans on profanity violate the First Amendment.

Obscene speech can be prohibited only if the Miller test is passed, which clearly does not apply here. (Using profanity does not appeal to the "prurient interest.")
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2005, 01:13:49 PM »

In a private place I would say they are unconstitutional. In a public place, I find no constitutional problem with them.

The freedom of speech has its limitations. To take the words in a literal and unlimited sense would be such a metamorphosis of what the framers intended, it's something I would expect from the Supreme Court.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,733
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2005, 02:18:56 PM »

The laws are unconstitutional if the speech does not cause any tangible harm to a person. If someone is offended by cursing, they are not tangibly harmed - you have no constitutional right to never be offended.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2005, 02:21:00 PM »

The issue here has nothing to do with a constitutional right to not be offended. Rather, it is about how broad free speech is. Your interpretation is incompatible with 200 years of constitutional law.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,733
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2005, 02:28:12 PM »

The issue here has nothing to do with a constitutional right to not be offended. Rather, it is about how broad free speech is. Your interpretation is incompatible with 200 years of constitutional law.

Evidence? I don't know if there's ever been a ruling or statement on cursing laws in regards to the first amendment.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2005, 02:30:08 PM »

Libel does not cause any tangible harm to a person. I assure you that has been illegal for some time.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,733
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2005, 02:36:07 PM »

Libel does not cause any tangible harm to a person. I assure you that has been illegal for some time.

Libel is written, slander is spoken. Wink

But, since that's besides the point, if Bob says Jim's restaraunt uses horse meat when it doesn't, and Jim's business goes down because of this rumor, there is tangible harm(maybe I should have been more specific, it's not just physical harm that applies, since speech can't hurt you at all). Further though, this is once again besides the point - a curse word isn't slander by any means, and as far as I know can't really cause any harm to another person.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2005, 02:43:44 PM »

If we're placing so much value on precedent, then the guiding case here is Cohen v. California. A man was punished for wearing a jacket bearing the words "F--- the draft" in a public courthouse; however, the Supreme Court overturned the conviction on First Amendment grounds.

"Absent a more particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment, make the simple public display of this single four-letter expletive a criminal offense."

If the public display of an expletive is constitutionally protected, then so too should be the public speaking of that expletive.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2005, 02:44:01 PM »

I was attacking the tangible harm premise. If opebo tells some three year old girl to suck his dick, that does her no tangible harm. I don't know too many people that would argue it's protected free speech under the first amendment.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,733
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2005, 02:52:38 PM »

I was attacking the tangible harm premise. If opebo tells some three year old girl to suck his dick, that does her no tangible harm. I don't know too many people that would argue it's protected free speech under the first amendment.

Well, I guess that's just differences in what we mean by 'tangible harm'. Admittedly some things are more tangible than others.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,526
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2005, 03:07:48 PM »

Yes that would be unconstitutional. In places like schools though it's not though.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,583
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2005, 03:34:15 PM »

More reason I'm never going to Virginia Beach. Did Pat Robertson get that law passed?

Does this also mean if a band was playing live there they could be arrested if they had profanity in their lyrics?
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2005, 04:45:33 PM »

you have no constitutional right to never be offended.

dude, I think folks have been saying this to the Politically Correct crowd for years.  Of course you're right.  But sell it to the creators of South Park or something, since clearly the Dems just aren't buying it.

Don't know whether the signs are unconstitutional, but the law's clearly unenforcible. 

"hey, I gotta whip my main vein out and take a piss."

"what, you can't say piss.  You have to say urinate."

"What?  I can't say piss.  chingate bolillo.  pinche pendejo."

"What did he say??!  Oh, he probably just translated 'I can't say piss' for the other guy or something."

Hmmmmmm.

Actually, the other weird law is the one that says men can ride riding mowers topless but women can't. 

Where are those NOW lawyers when you really need them? 

bitches.

oops, can't say that.  I meant c**nts.  that's still okay, right?  Wink
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2005, 04:48:23 PM »

If cursing were a crime, I'd be doing life. Smiley

I think it should be more a matter of public decency than law.  Cursing in private conversation with willing participants is fine, but people should not subject those who happen to be around them in a public place to loud cursing.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2005, 04:58:11 PM »

I always think it's a little bizarre to hear little kids say the nastiest things.  But you know, it's often the children of immigrants whose parents don't speak much english.  Seriously, I knew a bunch of 'em in high school that'd go around cussing like sailors.  They really didn't know any better.  Yeah, they'd eventually learn if they ever wanted to get a job, get laid by nice republican chicks, carry on a conversation with their teachers or parents of friends that they'd tone it down.  But seriously, when you're the 8 year old child of chinese parents who speak no english this is how you learn english:  watch TV.  I think there are some insular, sheltered folks in the world, but surely even they realize that this kind of law just won't work. 

Yeah, it's okay to correct someone's grammar.  Especially a foreigner's.  In fact, they usually appreciate.  I know I do when I'm speaking a foreign language and occassionally need to be corrected.  "You know, usually we don't call gay people Ass Pirate unless we're trying to be offensive."  "Gee thanks, I didn't realize that."

But this law is just unenforcible, probably unconstitutional, and a total waste of the resources of the people of Virginia.  But then that really doesn't distinguish it from many other laws, I suppose.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,570


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2005, 05:01:29 PM »

I always think it's a little bizarre to hear little kids say the nastiest things.  But you know, it's often the children of immigrants whose parents don't speak much english.  Seriously, I knew a bunch of 'em in high school that'd go around cussing like sailors.  They really didn't know any better.  Yeah, they'd eventually learn if they ever wanted to get a job, get laid by nice republican chicks, carry on a conversation with their teachers or parents of friends that they'd tone it down.  But seriously, when you're the 8 year old child of chinese parents who speak no english this is how you learn english:  watch TV.  I think there are some insular, sheltered folks in the world, but surely even they realize that this kind of law just won't work. 

Yeah, it's okay to correct someone's grammar.  Especially a foreigner's.  In fact, they usually appreciate.  I know I do when I'm speaking a foreign language and occassionally need to be corrected.  "You know, usually we don't call gay people Ass Pirate unless we're trying to be offensive."  "Gee thanks, I didn't realize that."

But this law is just unenforcible, probably unconstitutional, and a total waste of the resources of the people of Virginia.  But then that really doesn't distinguish it from many other laws, I suppose.

Get laid by nice Republican chicks? LOL
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,024
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2005, 11:00:48 AM »


No, it's not unconstitutional.  Most of our laws have some sort of "unfairness" built into them.  While you have freedom of speech, it doesn't mean you have freedom from being punished for what you say.  The classic shouting "fire" example is a perfect case.  While you are free to say it, you will be punished for saying it.  The same holds true with public television, where you are not allowed to swear.  In this case, if you swear within this town-limit, you face getting a ticket. 
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2005, 11:05:41 AM »

Either this law is unconstitutional, or the constitution isn't worth pissing on. Smiley
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2005, 11:07:37 AM »

While you have freedom of speech, it doesn't mean you have freedom from being punished for what you say.  The classic shouting "fire" example is a perfect case.  While you are free to say it, you will be punished for saying it.
Well, that certainly is a novel argument. That's like saying, it would be unconstitutional to ban criticizing the government, but it would be constitutional to punish it.

Of course, shouting "fire" in a theater constitutes a breach of the peace. Simply using profane language (absent other factors) does not. Therefore, the latter cannot be subject to a blanket prohibition by the government.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,583
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2005, 12:14:28 PM »

Once again, does this mean that if a band were to play there they could be arrested for profanity in their lyrics?

I need to tell any bands I know going on tour to avoid Virginia Beach.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2005, 01:38:35 PM »

The freedom of speech has its limitations. To take the words in a literal and unlimited sense would be such a metamorphosis of what the framers intended, it's something I would expect from the Supreme Court.
How would you define "freedom of speech", by the way?

There is a common-law definition of "freedom of the press"; however, I have not found a common-law definition of "freedom of speech."
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2005, 01:44:31 PM »

I'm not going by the common law. I'm just trying to apply it reasonably... I would define it as expression, but I think it applies less on public property than it does on private property.

For example, you may have the first amendment right to put up a sign on your front lawn supporting a candidate for some political office, but that doesn't mean you can put in on public property.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2005, 02:02:39 PM »

For example, you may have the first amendment right to put up a sign on your front lawn supporting a candidate for some political office, but that doesn't mean you can put in on public property.
does that statement hold true for The Ten Commandments as well?
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2005, 02:08:24 PM »

I'm not going by the common law. I'm just trying to apply it reasonably... I would define it as expression, but I think it applies less on public property than it does on private property.
I see. That seems like a very reasonable view. For example, I hardly think that walking nude on government property is protected "speech."

I would say that the First Amendment prohibits the government from punishing or restricting any expression whatsoever on the basis of content. The government can certainly impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of delivery; for example, it may prohibit a person from causing a public disturbance by blaring his message on loudspakers in the middle of the night. Or, to use your example, the government can prohibit the putting up of a political sign on government property. However, any time, place, and manner restrictions must be completely independent of content.

I think that the Supreme Court has not gone far enough in protecting the freedom of speech in some cases. In particular, I am rather appalled that anything that is "obscene" or does not conform to "community standards" can be banned. On the other hand, the court has expanded it too much in other instances. Most notable, I think, is New York Times v. Sullivan and the creation of an "actual malice" standard in libel cases. (The First Amendment absolutist Justice Black makes an interesting case that libel laws are unconstitutional, but I am not wholly convinced.)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.