Are "No Cursing" laws unconstitutional?

[A18]

In a private place I would say they are unconstitutional. In a public place, I find no constitutional problem with them.

The freedom of speech has its limitations. To take the words in a literal and unlimited sense would be such a metamorphosis of what the framers intended, it's something I would expect from the Supreme Court.

[A18]

The issue here has nothing to do with a constitutional right to not be offended. Rather, it is about how broad free speech is. Your interpretation is incompatible with 200 years of constitutional law.

[A18]

Libel does not cause any tangible harm to a person. I assure you that has been illegal for some time.

[A18]

I was attacking the tangible harm premise. If opebo tells some three year old girl to suck his dick, that does her no tangible harm. I don't know too many people that would argue it's protected free speech under the first amendment.

[A18]

I'm not going by the common law. I'm just trying to apply it reasonably... I would define it as expression, but I think it applies less on public property than it does on private property.

For example, you may have the first amendment right to put up a sign on your front lawn supporting a candidate for some political office, but that doesn't mean you can put in on public property.

[A18]

So how about bans on public nudity?

[A18]

The only thing that's clear if that you are completely ignorant of the history and text of the first amendment.