Pacific Legislature Official Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 07:37:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Pacific Legislature Official Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73
Author Topic: Pacific Legislature Official Thread  (Read 260295 times)
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1750 on: January 10, 2012, 02:57:13 AM »

Not that I am necessarily opposed to a maximum income cap (which the 45.5% rate effectively creates), but it is quite possible that a bracket of 20% on incomes exceeding $50 million would be lower than brackets beneath it.  I am unable to find anything in the Pacific law code which would suggest what the next tax rate is, however, so perhaps the best solution would be to abolish present rates and start from scratch.

I'd be fine with that.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,068
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1751 on: January 10, 2012, 07:02:58 AM »

I can support reducing it to 30%, but not any lower and only if the lower brackets are reduced accordingly.
Logged
Jackson
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1752 on: January 10, 2012, 08:54:57 AM »

That is an acceptable compromise, except we apparently only have three tax brackets,

0-300,000 ( 0%)

300-50,000,000 ( 3%)

50,000,000 (48.5%)

I think we should do a total re-write of the tax code if we are going to lower the tax rates on the wealthiest Pacificans.
 
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,068
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1753 on: January 10, 2012, 02:01:35 PM »

Yeah, these tax brackets look pretty silly... How is it possible to go from 3% to 48 ? Huh
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1754 on: January 10, 2012, 05:06:13 PM »

How about this?:


0-30,000 (0%)

30,000-100,000 (3%)

100,000-1,000,000 (5%)

1,000,000-10,000,000 (10%)

10,000,000-49,999,999 (15%)

50,000,000+ (30%)
Logged
Jackson
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1755 on: January 10, 2012, 08:34:39 PM »

Yeah, these tax brackets look pretty silly... How is it possible to go from 3% to 48 ? Huh

The legislature never bothered to create a tax code, but passed laws creating a tax bracket on 50,000,000+ at 40%, and then raised that to 48.5 percent, and also raised taxes 3% on a previously uncreated tax bracket of 300,000+, thus causing the current dilemma.

How about this?:


0-30,000 (0%)

30,000-100,000 (3%)

100,000-1,000,000 (5%)

1,000,000-10,000,000 (10%)

10,000,000-49,999,999 (15%)

50,000,000+ (30%)

I think I can support these tax brackets, but I need to see if the rest of the legislature agrees first.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1756 on: January 10, 2012, 11:06:44 PM »
« Edited: January 10, 2012, 11:08:33 PM by Ebowed »

That looks good, I would prefer if the beginning threshold were increased to 50k and there was a lower rate from 30k-50k (like 1%), but it's not a deal breaker.  (Mainly due to the existing federal income tax)
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1757 on: January 11, 2012, 12:35:43 AM »

That looks good, I would prefer if the beginning threshold were increased to 50k and there was a lower rate from 30k-50k (like 1%), but it's not a deal breaker.  (Mainly due to the existing federal income tax)

Sure:


0-29,999 (0%)

30,000-49,999 (1%)

50,000-99,999 (3%)

100,000-999,999 (5%)

1,000,000-9,999,999 (10%)

10,000,000-49,999,999 (15%)

50,000,000+ (30%)
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1758 on: January 11, 2012, 12:57:56 AM »

While we're on the subject of revenue, is there any support here to restrict and/or tax commercial gambling? Wink
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,068
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1759 on: January 11, 2012, 06:57:57 AM »

That looks good, I would prefer if the beginning threshold were increased to 50k and there was a lower rate from 30k-50k (like 1%), but it's not a deal breaker.  (Mainly due to the existing federal income tax)

Sure:


0-29,999 (0%)

30,000-49,999 (1%)

50,000-99,999 (3%)

100,000-999,999 (5%)

1,000,000-9,999,999 (10%)

10,000,000-49,999,999 (15%)

50,000,000+ (30%)

That seems pretty nice.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1760 on: January 11, 2012, 08:08:50 PM »

While we're on the subject of revenue, is there any support here to restrict and/or tax commercial gambling? Wink

Maybe.  Any particular ideas?  Wink
Logged
Jackson
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1761 on: January 11, 2012, 11:04:29 PM »

I would be fine with taxing gambling, but not necessarily restricting it.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1762 on: January 11, 2012, 11:23:40 PM »

I would be fine with taxing gambling, but not necessarily restricting it.

^^^Me too. 
Logged
Jackson
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1763 on: January 13, 2012, 10:49:51 PM »

Is someone going to draft a bill for the new tax law so I can sign it into law?
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1764 on: January 14, 2012, 07:43:17 PM »
« Edited: January 14, 2012, 07:45:48 PM by Ebowed »

Income Tax Reform Bill

1. Effective FY 2013, all regional income taxes shall be abolished and replaced with the following brackets:
a. 0% on all income earned from 0-29,999
b. 1% on all income earned from 30,000-49,999
c. 3% on all income earned from 50,000-99,999
d. 5% on all income earned from 100,000-999,999
e. 10% on all income earned from 1,000,000-9,999,999
f. 15% on all income earned from 10,000,000-49,999,999
g. 30% on all income earned past 49,999,999
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1765 on: January 14, 2012, 11:09:07 PM »

Income Tax Reform Bill

1. Effective FY 2013, all regional income taxes shall be abolished and replaced with the following brackets:
a. 0% on all income earned from 0-29,999
b. 1% on all income earned from 30,000-49,999
c. 3% on all income earned from 50,000-99,999
d. 5% on all income earned from 100,000-999,999
e. 10% on all income earned from 1,000,000-9,999,999
f. 15% on all income earned from 10,000,000-49,999,999
g. 30% on all income earned past 49,999,999

x  Fuzzy
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1766 on: January 16, 2012, 08:34:52 PM »
« Edited: January 16, 2012, 08:36:24 PM by Fuzzy »

Seeing as though everyone here has been killed off again, I declare myself king and head pimp of the Pacific Region.  


ALL HAIL THE HONORABLE FUZZY!!!1!!1!






Oh wait, since everyone is dead, no one can worship me.  Sad
Logged
Jackson
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1767 on: January 17, 2012, 12:52:12 AM »

no don't

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1768 on: January 17, 2012, 01:08:23 AM »

I sign anything that needs a signature,  like Ebowed's bill:

x bgwah Grin
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1769 on: January 18, 2012, 03:55:14 PM »

Good catch on the Income Tax Bill - Should have written a story on it back in December to get you guys acting on it, only, I didn't know about it until I saw it in this thread. Wink

Jackson, expect some nice donations from wealthy Pacificans (Huh) coming your way, now that they can actually afford to make political donations. Wink
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1770 on: January 19, 2012, 12:36:04 AM »

So is that income tax bill law already?   I can't quite grasp the procedure of your assembly. 

New highest effective income tax rate (regional and federal) under this bill is 72%, figuring in the federal deduction for regional taxes, in case anyone was wondering.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1771 on: January 19, 2012, 12:43:56 AM »

So is that income tax bill law already?   I can't quite grasp the procedure of your assembly. 

New highest effective income tax rate (regional and federal) under this bill is 72%, figuring in the federal deduction for regional taxes, in case anyone was wondering.

No, we need more signatures first, than we have a vote and so on. 



Thanks for the heads up on the net tax rate.  Smiley
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,068
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1772 on: January 19, 2012, 07:31:09 AM »
« Edited: January 20, 2012, 01:36:16 PM by Antonio V »

Income Tax Reform Bill

1. Effective FY 2013, all regional income taxes shall be abolished and replaced with the following brackets:
a. 0% on all income earned from 0-29,999
b. 1% on all income earned from 30,000-49,999
c. 3% on all income earned from 50,000-99,999
d. 5% on all income earned from 100,000-999,999
e. 10% on all income earned from 1,000,000-9,999,999
f. 15% on all income earned from 10,000,000-49,999,999
g. 30% on all income earned past 49,999,999

x  Fuzzy

X Antonio V

Edit : If possible, I'd like to retract my signature and offer an amendment.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,068
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1773 on: January 19, 2012, 07:32:01 AM »

New highest effective income tax rate (regional and federal) under this bill is 72%, figuring in the federal deduction for regional taxes, in case anyone was wondering.

I'm pretty sure it's 90%, isn't it ? Highest federal rate is 60%.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1774 on: January 19, 2012, 07:37:45 AM »
« Edited: January 19, 2012, 07:42:40 AM by Ebowed »

Just gonna throw this out there in case there is support ....

Maximum Income Cap Bill

1. No business operating in any capacity within the Pacific Region may provide an annual income to any employee that is to exceed $70 million, including bonus benefits.



I also believe that it is imperative, if we are to reform our income tax code, that we look at methods of increasing our revenue stream from areas such as the estate tax and the capital gains tax.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 11 queries.