Should people who criticize Bush be locked up in camps?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 07:06:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should people who criticize Bush be locked up in camps?		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Should people who criticize Bush be locked up in camps?
#1
yes		  
#2
no		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Should people who criticize Bush be locked up in camps?  (Read 3974 times)
Giant Saguaro
TheGiantSaguaro
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 10, 2005, 01:19:22 PM »
Oh boy sure, out in the middle of the desert would be another option. Everyone who 'criticizes Bush.' Nagin could be of help here too: take care of water distribution, he could arrange for pavilion building. Just to be fair, we could have FEMA ready with supplies and portable eqipment and so forth just in case. And you know what else we could do? Clone these people and replace them with people who won't criticize Bush. [evil, echoing laugh] Mwahahaha!
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 10, 2005, 03:04:45 PM »
Quote from: MacFarlan on September 09, 2005, 11:42:24 AM
It would make more sense to lock up people who criticize President Clinton in mental hospitals - the reason being that anyone that is that hung up on something that is none of their business (affair with ML), has obviously got issues.

Good point. Perhaps Clinton didn't mind being criticized as much as Bush does because he [Clinton] is more intellectual.
Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 10, 2005, 09:06:58 PM »
Quote from: nclib on September 10, 2005, 03:04:45 PM
Quote from: MacFarlan on September 09, 2005, 11:42:24 AM
It would make more sense to lock up people who criticize President Clinton in mental hospitals - the reason being that anyone that is that hung up on something that is none of their business (affair with ML), has obviously got issues.

Good point. Perhaps Clinton didn't mind being criticized as much as Bush does because he [Clinton] is more intellectual.

Bush is emotional.

Clinton was hormonal.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 10, 2005, 09:56:38 PM »
Quote from: Tredrick on September 10, 2005, 09:06:58 PM
Quote from: nclib on September 10, 2005, 03:04:45 PM
Quote from: MacFarlan on September 09, 2005, 11:42:24 AM
It would make more sense to lock up people who criticize President Clinton in mental hospitals - the reason being that anyone that is that hung up on something that is none of their business (affair with ML), has obviously got issues.

Good point. Perhaps Clinton didn't mind being criticized as much as Bush does because he [Clinton] is more intellectual.

Bush is emotional.

Clinton was hormonal.
Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,642
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 12, 2005, 10:48:10 AM »
Again another idiotic poll that serves no perpose.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 12, 2005, 11:13:02 AM »
[irrelevant and partially trollish]

It'd be funny and ironic if htmldon supported putting Bush critics into forced slavery.  He already calls them 'traitors'.

[/irrelevant and partially trollish]
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 12, 2005, 03:27:10 PM »
What's this, four or five polls that serve little purpose toward debate?
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 13, 2005, 07:16:57 AM »
Certainly not, Bush should be freely - and fairly - criticised under the First Amendment. If His Incompetence went without criticism then something would be very sadly wrong

Dave
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 14 queries.