Minimum Wage and Unemployment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:09:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Minimum Wage and Unemployment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If the minimum wage were abolished, what effect would it have on unemplyoment?
#1
Greatly Decrease
 
#2
Slightly Decrease
 
#3
No change
 
#4
Slightly Increase
 
#5
Greatly Increase
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Minimum Wage and Unemployment  (Read 3478 times)
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« on: September 17, 2005, 12:31:07 AM »

In the microeconomic sense, the minimum wage should increase unemployment, but in the macroeconomic sense being long term and the economy as a whole, it should have no effect on UE, but will increase the GDP and personal spending power.  One should also realize people in this wage zone have the least DI (disposable income) and their MPC (marginal propensity to consume) is much greater.  Inflation may go up a little but the real wages will definitely increase so ergo I favor a min wage increase.   
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2005, 06:12:51 PM »

In the microeconomic sense, the minimum wage should increase unemployment, but in the macroeconomic sense being long term and the economy as a whole, it should have no effect on UE, but will increase the GDP and personal spending power. One should also realize people in this wage zone have the least DI (disposable income) and their MPC (marginal propensity to consume) is much greater. Inflation may go up a little but the real wages will definitely increase so ergo I favor a min wage increase.

Any increase in purchasing power from a higher minimum wage will be offset by a decrease in purchasing power somewhere else.

Of course - the goal is to transferr purchasing power from the owning class to the working class.

Forgot to mention that opebo.  That is why I abhor supply side economics.  It's a sorry excuse to give the wealthy more purchasing power.  The CATO Institute and Club for Growth are glorified PACs that hope to carry these objectives out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 15 queries.