Would you vote to confirm a Communist to the Supreme Court? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 09:07:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Would you vote to confirm a Communist to the Supreme Court? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you vote to confirm a Communist to the Supreme Court?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Would you vote to confirm a Communist to the Supreme Court?  (Read 3795 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« on: September 24, 2005, 05:00:42 PM »

Why would a communist want to be a judge, when he knows he has to apply a document that stands so diametrically opposed to his views?

I would be suspicious of his motives.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2005, 05:02:56 PM »

Communist: I don't care about the Constitution.

Kennedy: He seems very qualified.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2005, 05:05:28 PM »

Which is why I wouldn't have voted for FDR.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2005, 07:24:58 PM »

Why would a communist want to be a judge, when he knows he has to apply a document that stands so diametrically opposed to his views?

"[A] Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory" --Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Yeah, nice job taking a quote dealing with the economic regulatory powers of the states, and applying it to a completely foreign situation.

The powers of the federal government are few and defined. If a communist supports coining money, there might be something for him in the Constitution. There's not much else.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2005, 09:27:06 AM »

People's views don't 'get in the way' of interpretation - they create their interpretations.  All these so called judicial theories such as strict constructionism are just methods of making the constitution promote ones ideology. 

Yeah, that's why the three dissenters in Gonzales v. Raich were so liberal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.