Would you have voted to confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

[opebo]

No

What?  I thought you were a Democrat.  So this Repubilcan avatar is no joke?

[minionofmidas]

Anyways, what's so extremist?

The whole prostitution and federal funding of abortions are constitutionally protected thing...  And how we should remove any reference to "he," "man," etc in the Constitution and replace it with "he/she," "man/woman" etc

The latter is personal taste and not a constitutional opinion though.

[minionofmidas]

Anyways, what's so extremist? Where is she considerably to the left of Thurgood Marshall and what's his name...William O Douglas maybe...hope I'm thinking of the right name...?

Prostitution, abortion, pretty much anything tangenitally connected to her blanket federal right to privacy belief counts here.

She wasn't even on the court that invented that doctrine!

[WiseGuy]

Yes.  As long as the nominee isn't terrorably unqualified/a threat to the nation, the President deserves to pick who he wants.

[TeePee4Prez]

Yes

[Jake]

She wasn't even on the court that invented that doctrine!

So you're saying someone needs to be involved in something to believe it?

[nclib]

No

What?  I thought you were a Democrat.  So this Repubilcan avatar is no joke?

1 and 3-7

Not Ginsburg? That surprises me.

I didn't like her performance before the judiciary commitee.

[nclib]

I would have voted to confirm Ginsburg as she is intelligent and I agree with her interpretation of the Constitution.

[minionofmidas]

She wasn't even on the court that invented that doctrine!

So you're saying someone needs to be involved in something to believe it?

How can you possibly be the most extreme justice ever for believing in the doctrines of a former (but recent) court. That's just logically absurd.

[Jake]

So you're saying a justice that supports precedent cannot be extreme. That's the absurd statement.

[TheresNoMoney]

One can only do that so many hours per day, Jako.

LMAO.