Is it intolerant to wish to feed the secular to lions?

[John Dibble]

Opposite question from the other one. I of course vote yes - I think it's pretty intolerant to want to feed any group to lions.

[CheeseWhiz]

Yes, of course (Religious)

[Speed of Sound]

Yes (religious)

[KillerPollo]

Yes it is, and more cruel than beheading them with a katana.

[opebo]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

[phk]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

[Joe Republic]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

[phk]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

Tolerance must not be extended to the intolerant.

[John Dibble]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

Tolerance must not be extended to the intolerant.

Then I shouldn't tolerate you, but I do anyways. The two polls seem to be showing that the religious are more tolerant of seculars than seculars are of them.

[nclib]

Only on that one issue.

[phk]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

Tolerance must not be extended to the intolerant.

Then I shouldn't tolerate you, but I do anyways. The two polls seem to be showing that the religious are more tolerant of seculars than seculars are of them.

Not true, I tolerate Muslims and Christians; although I wish they would kill each other off.

[A18]

Yes, and it's also a good idea.

[John Dibble]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

Tolerance must not be extended to the intolerant.

Then I shouldn't tolerate you, but I do anyways. The two polls seem to be showing that the religious are more tolerant of seculars than seculars are of them.

Not true, I tolerate Muslims and Christians; although I wish they would kill each other off.

Does the bolded statement not conflict with that? It certainly implied that you don't tolerate intolerants, and further it implied that religious people were intolerants. So then, do you tolerate them, even though you view them as intolerant, or do you view them as not intolerant?

[phk]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

Tolerance must not be extended to the intolerant.

Then I shouldn't tolerate you, but I do anyways. The two polls seem to be showing that the religious are more tolerant of seculars than seculars are of them.

Not true, I tolerate Muslims and Christians; although I wish they would kill each other off.

Does the bolded statement not conflict with that? It certainly implied that you don't tolerate intolerants, and further it implied that religious people were intolerants. So then, do you tolerate them, even though you view them as intolerant, or do you view them as not intolerant?

I view them as more annoying than anything.

[opebo]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

No, I have no intolerance for the religious.  I merely do not tolerate their intolerance.

For example if they would stop being intolerant, there would be no need to feed them to the lions.  Of course it is difficult to prove a change of heart, and given their sordid record, it would probably be better - just to be on the safe side - to feed them to the lions anyway, in spite of any protestations of newfound secularism.

[John Dibble]

Yes, but only because the secular are tolerant - which of course they generally are, particularly compared to the religious.

And yet as a secular person, you display your complete intolerance for religious people.  Thus contradicting your post completely.

No, I have no intolerance for the religious.  I merely do not tolerate their intolerance.

For example if they would stop being intolerant, there would be no need to feed them to the lions.  Of course it is difficult to prove a change of heart, and given their sordid record, it would probably be better - just to be on the safe side - to feed them to the lions anyway, in spite of any protestations of newfound secularism.

There's no need to feed them to lions period. Only a hateful, sadistic, intolerant bastard would kill his enemies in such a cruel manner when less cruel methods exist. Now just go back to your whores, Hitler.