Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 22, 2013, 09:26:47 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
General Discussion
Constitution and Law
(Moderators:
Emsworth
,
True Federalist
)
Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Poll
Question:
The ruling was...
Constitutionally sound
4 (9.1%)
Constitutionally unsound
40 (90.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 44
Author
Topic: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London (Read 6064 times)
dead0man
YaBB God
Posts: 19182
Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #25 on:
November 18, 2009, 07:24:25 am »
Nobody likes the punch line?
Logged
Quote from: Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21520
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #26 on:
November 18, 2009, 08:45:22 pm »
Quote from: dead0man on November 12, 2009, 03:10:14 am
And now for the punchline of this joke....
link
Quote
The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London stands as one of the worst in recent years, handing local governments carte blanche to seize private property in the name of economic development. Now,
four years after that decision gave Susette Kelo's land to private developers for a project including a hotel and offices intended to enhance Pfizer Inc.'s nearby corporate facility, the pharmaceutical giant has announced it will close its research and development headquarters in New London, Connecticut.
<snip>
That's especially galling because the five Supreme Court Justices cited the development plan as a major factor in rationalizing their Kelo decision. Justice Anthony Kennedy called the plan "comprehensive," while Justice John Paul Stevens insisted that "The city has carefully formulated a development plan that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including, but not limited to, new jobs and increased tax revenue." So much for that.
A fitting end for a depressing assault on individual property rights. Too bad Kelo will probably not get her land back.
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Purple State
YaBB God
Posts: 6786
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #27 on:
November 22, 2009, 01:51:42 am »
Why are Connecticut cities the source of so many contentious Supreme Court rulings? New City, New Haven...
Any others for the hat trick?
Logged
Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread
Thank you to all our supporters!
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29153
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #28 on:
November 22, 2009, 01:53:21 am »
Quote from: GM Purple State on November 22, 2009, 01:51:42 am
Why are Connecticut cities the source of so many contentious Supreme Court rulings? New City, New Haven...
Any others for the hat trick?
Not a city, but obviously Griswold v. Connecticut was an important ruling.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68058
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #29 on:
November 22, 2009, 05:37:31 pm »
Can anyone explain this map?
It was a referendum to ban the use of eminent domain as used in the case in question in the state. Are south central North Dakota Republicans just really hardcore statists?
Logged
dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
Posts: 12158
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #30 on:
November 23, 2009, 06:20:09 am »
Awful decision, one of the worst.
Logged
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
YaBB God
Posts: 1956
Re: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
«
Reply #31 on:
February 12, 2010, 10:14:02 am »
I have been going to college in New London for 2 years and i can tell you first hand that nothing good has come from that case. There is tons of undeveloped space, and only a few companies actually took advantage of the decision.
Logged
metaphysical principles relied on deductive logic, just like isolationism,non-intervention, and the common good do today. More importantly however is that various individuals make the mistake of using them for a golden axiom, despite the fact they have no inherent quality.-John Hoffman
people who claim to be critical thinkers without imposing a simple form of inquiry tend to be pseudoskeptics.-John hoffman
to kill an argument...focus on its structure, and assumptions.- john Hoffman.
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...