Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 23, 2014, 11:25:42 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Property Rights, Kelo v. New London
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Poll
Question: The ruling was...
Constitutionally sound   -4 (9.1%)
Constitutionally unsound   -40 (90.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Property Rights, Kelo v. New London  (Read 6593 times)
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22220
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: November 18, 2009, 07:24:25 am »
Ignore

Nobody likes the punch line?
Logged

IDS Attorney General PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22479
United States


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: November 18, 2009, 08:45:22 pm »
Ignore

And now for the punchline of this joke....link
Quote
The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London stands as one of the worst in recent years, handing local governments carte blanche to seize private property in the name of economic development. Now, four years after that decision gave Susette Kelo's land to private developers for a project including a hotel and offices intended to enhance Pfizer Inc.'s nearby corporate facility, the pharmaceutical giant has announced it will close its research and development headquarters in New London, Connecticut.

<snip>

That's especially galling because the five Supreme Court Justices cited the development plan as a major factor in rationalizing their Kelo decision. Justice Anthony Kennedy called the plan "comprehensive," while Justice John Paul Stevens insisted that "The city has carefully formulated a development plan that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including, but not limited to, new jobs and increased tax revenue." So much for that.

     A fitting end for a depressing assault on individual property rights. Too bad Kelo will probably not get her land back.
Logged

Purple State
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6780
United States


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: November 22, 2009, 01:51:42 am »
Ignore

Why are Connecticut cities the source of so many contentious Supreme Court rulings? New City, New Haven...

Any others for the hat trick?
Logged

Marokai/Purple Main Campaign Thread

Thank you to all our supporters!

○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31676


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: November 22, 2009, 01:53:21 am »
Ignore

Why are Connecticut cities the source of so many contentious Supreme Court rulings? New City, New Haven...

Any others for the hat trick?

Not a city, but obviously Griswold v. Connecticut was an important ruling.
Logged
black and white band photos
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 72240
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: November 22, 2009, 05:37:31 pm »
Ignore

Can anyone explain this map?



It was a referendum to ban the use of eminent domain as used in the case in question in the state. Are south central North Dakota Republicans just really hardcore statists?
Logged




01/05/2004-01/10/2014
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11975
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: November 23, 2009, 06:20:09 am »
Ignore

Awful decision, one of the worst.
Logged

Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1953
United States


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2010, 10:14:02 am »
Ignore

I have been going to college in New London for 2 years and i can tell you first hand that nothing good has come from that case. There is tons of undeveloped space, and only a few companies actually took advantage of the decision.
Logged

metaphysical principles relied on deductive logic, just like isolationism,non-intervention, and the common good do today. More importantly however is that various individuals make the mistake of using them for a golden axiom, despite the fact they have no inherent quality.-John Hoffman

people who claim to be critical thinkers without imposing a simple form of inquiry tend to be pseudoskeptics.-John hoffman

to kill an argument...focus on its structure, and assumptions.- john Hoffman.
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines