Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 08:33:29 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderators: Emsworth, True Federalist)
| | |-+  Commerce Clause, Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: The ruling was...
Constitutionally sound   -2 (100%)
Constitutionally unsound   -0 (0%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 2

Author Topic: Commerce Clause, Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States  (Read 3552 times)
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23972
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« on: November 12, 2005, 01:02:55 pm »
Ignore

Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States, 220 U.S. 45 (1911)

The Court upheld the Pure Food and Drug Act as not exceeding Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2005, 01:45:14 pm by A18 »Logged
Emsworth
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9124


Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2005, 01:55:30 pm »

The decision was sound.

The relevant section of the Pure Food and Drug Act prohibited the transportation of impure foods across state lines, for the purpose of sale. Undoubtedly, such transportation constitutes a part of commerce among the states, and is therefore subject to congressional regulation. The Act also provided that any food transported across state lines in violation of the law would be forfeited to the federal government. 

The impure eggs involved in this case were transported from Missouri to Illinois, where they were seized by the federal government. It is true that, when the eggs were seized, they had already come to rest in Illinois, and all interstate commerce involving them had already ceased. How, then, could the government proceed to seize them?

It is important not to confuse regulations of interstate commerce with punishments for disobeying those regulations. The regulation here was that impure foods should not be transported across state lines. The punishment was that illegally transported foods should be forfeited. The seizure of the eggs was not regulation, but only punishment. Thus, even if they had already come to rest within Illinois, they were still subject to seizure and forfeiture.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory