The Pentagon
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:38:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Pentagon
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: The Pentagon  (Read 3887 times)
WiseGuy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 15, 2005, 07:13:14 AM »

This is where I will be posting policy recommendations to the President, and where I will hold press conferences at set times.  The First Press Conference begins at 1200 hours.
Logged
WiseGuy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2006, 08:21:56 PM »

I have sent the following policy suggestion to the President:

Resolution from the Secretary of Defense.

1. Effective immediately, withdraw all troops from Europe.
2. Place a twenty year cap on troop deployments to a region, unless that area is of strategic importance to the US Military.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2006, 08:30:51 PM »

can we impeach the secretary? Tongue

Seriously....no. Especially part 2.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2006, 08:32:12 PM »

Hugh shows his lack of reasoning again.
Logged
WiseGuy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2006, 08:38:12 PM »


Why do you believe our troops should be in a country more the twenty years after the strategic advantage of having them there has expired.  The Atlasian Military are sworn to protect Atlasians, not Germans, not Italians, Not French.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2006, 08:43:15 PM »

Because we have no idea when an area will be of strategic importance. For example, the embassy bombings in kenya.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2006, 08:48:05 PM »

The embassy bombings did not require two heavy divisions to respond to them.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2006, 08:48:33 PM »

Atlasia no longer has any military interest in Europe.  The Cold War is long over, and any other conflicts can be dealt with by NATO, the UN, or even the EU if they want.

I firmly support this resolution, and I hope to see it reach the Senate in some shape or form very soon.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2006, 08:55:54 PM »

Why can you not just order the military to redeploy home in the interim? All the Senate will do is order the sale/closure of military bases and probably pass an omnibus bill covering the redeployment home.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2006, 08:59:45 PM »

Believe me, I would.  However, if I did that and then the measures fail to pass the Senate, I'd have to send everybody and everything back there again.  That's a financial cost and an embarrassment that I'd rather not face.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2006, 09:07:42 PM »

Atlasia no longer has any military interest in Europe.

We don't just have abses in areas where we have a vested interest.  We also have bases in areas that allow us to more quickly deploy to those areas where we have a vested interest.  For example, we have big airbases in Britain, Germany, and italy which help us more easily deploy our people to and get them our of the Middle East.  We have naval stations so ships in the Mediterrenean (which patrol near Libya, Lebanon, Israel, and Egypt) can easily re-supply.  If we withdraw all assets in Europe, then we won't be able to do things so simple as medical evacuations from Iraq to hospitals in Germany.

Oh, and I forgot: The Balkans!  Hello!
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2006, 09:07:59 PM »

It is the Secretary of State's opinion (although who really cares about my opinion Wink), that all troops should remain in Europe for the need for a quick movement of troops for any future crisis in Europe, the Middle East, or Northern Africa.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2006, 09:24:47 PM »

Not smart either True Dem. We need only to maintain certain infrastructure (Aviano, Ramstein, etc.), not all of our troop bases. Naval facilities should, of course, be maintained, though naval committment can be lessened.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2006, 09:31:25 PM »

Not smart either True Dem. We need only to maintain certain infrastructure (Aviano, Ramstein, etc.), not all of our troop bases. Naval facilities should, of course, be maintained, though naval committment can be lessened.

I agree that the troop levels should be lessened, but not entirely pulled out.  I assumed that Dubya's plan called for dismantling all the bases, which would be a huge mistake.  I would support cutting the troop levels maybe 25-30%.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2006, 09:56:51 PM »

Which troops? I'm of the opinion that we should maintain our full forces in the Balkans, while withdrawing the combat units from elsewhere in Europe, save a few air units in the UK.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2006, 09:59:25 PM »

Which troops? I'm of the opinion that we should maintain our full forces in the Balkans, while withdrawing the combat units from elsewhere in Europe, save a few air units in the UK.

It is my recollection that there are troops stationed in Western Europe, are there not?  I think we should leave some combat troops in Western Europe.  Basically, I hold a similar opinion to you, not that my decision counts for anything.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2006, 10:02:04 PM »

All our heavy combat troops in Western Europe are doing now that they couldn't do in similar US bases is prop up the local economies near their bases. That's pretty much it. If you make the argument that we should maintain them for strategic deployments, why not just maintain the equiptment, meaning that they are only a six hour flight from Europe.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2006, 10:05:22 PM »

Well to change the subject, that was my 3000th post Smiley
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2006, 10:31:25 PM »

Somewhere in thea rchives is my old pentagon thread where I suggest doing essentially what Jake said.  Maintain troops in the Balkans, deployment related facilities in Europe, and bring the two heavy divisions in Germany home.
Logged
WiseGuy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2006, 08:54:30 PM »

I have a compromise in the works.  Stay tuned Smiley
Logged
WiseGuy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2006, 10:14:49 PM »

Here is my revised Resolution recomending reduction of military presence in Europe:

Resolution from the Secretary of Defense

(A) All military presence shall be withdrawn from the following Nations:

   1. Germany
   2. Italy
   3. Spain
   4. Iceland
   5. Belgium
   6. Portugal
   7. The Netherlands
   8. Greece
   9. Greenland

(B) The troops withdrawn from the Nations listed under section (A) will undergo Special Forces Anti-Terrorism Combat Training, and be reorganized into Special Forces Anti-Terrorism Units.

(C) Once the units have been reorganized, they shall be deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2006, 10:19:21 PM »

WTF No
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2006, 10:26:14 PM »


That's a COMPROMISE? Tongue
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2006, 10:30:30 PM »

That's not exactly a compromise. It's more like saying we'll do what I want, but then do something different with the troops afterward.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2006, 10:35:37 PM »

Given that Jake's central complaint was that you shouldn't close bases like Ramstein, I don't think closing bases like Ramstein can be considered a compromise from Jake's perspective.  I appreciate that my point about the Balkans was taken seriously, but its still a little worrisome that such an oversight was made.

Were there even any diplomatic feelers to see how crucial allies would react to this?  Hell, did True Dem even get notified before you issued the press release?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 11 queries.