Roe v. Wade

[opebo]

Of course not.  Bans on abortion are unconstitutional violations of the right to privacy.

[opebo]

Pro-lifers are the minority in this country. Their numbers are often overestimated because they are extremely voca about their opposition to legal abortion.

Not to mention their frequent acts of terrorism, Scoonie.

[opebo]

Overturn it, let the states decide. I think one of the most dishonest things the left has done is fight to protect a ruling they know to be dead wrong in order to force thier beliefs on the American people.

You idiot, the decision doesn't force anyone beliefs on anyone else, it merely prevents the intolerants from forcing their beliefs on pregnant women and their doctors. 

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That is irrelevant, Tory, the Right to Privacy is in the constitution.

[opebo]

That is irrelevant, Tory, the Right to Privacy is in the constitution.

No, it's not. You've admitted you're just making it up, so why do you keep posting it as if it's fact?

No, I never made it up, the Foundling Fathers did.

[opebo]

You admitted that your 'interpretation' was just a political decision.

No, not my interpretation, but that of the Supreme Court is a political decision.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

They were inconsistent, which is unsurprising given what awful primitives they were.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sure, the Bill of Rights. 

[opebo]

You said anyone who interprets something is just making a political decision.

That is certainly true.. though of course meaningless unless you have power.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

What does the original understanding have to do with it? 

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm not familiar with the document.

[opebo]

So why do you keep claiming your interpretation as fact?

Because I like the Right to Privacy.  The Constitution is practically worthless without it.