Nutter wins Bolivia Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:14:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Nutter wins Bolivia Election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nutter wins Bolivia Election  (Read 8957 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: December 19, 2005, 12:00:50 PM »

this guy makes lula look like a swell guy!
Lula is a swell guy.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2005, 12:03:37 PM »

I wasn't even aware there were elections up ... why'd nobody tell me ? Huh Tongue
Over 50%... wow. Last time he polled half that (granted that was a very divided election, with two major candidates per rough political camp.)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2005, 12:48:54 PM »

...in other words, a man much like you and me. Tongue
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2005, 09:06:23 AM »

Just thought I'd check regional polarization levels.

By the way, the Electoral Commission says 33.4% of precincts have reported and 29.5% of all eligible voters have voted in them - we're either looking at an extremely high turnout, or the city precincts are much larger and have been counted first.

Morales is at 48.3%, the Conservative guy at 34.7%.

Chuquisaqua (214K registered voters) 51.7% - 35.9% with 48.0% of precincts reporting
La Paz (1.18 mio) 66.1 - 19.1 with 31.0
Cochabamba (649K) 47.1 - 39.9 with 32.1
Oruro (194K) 55.1 - 32.2 with 33.0
Potosí (282K) 49.7 - 36.7 with 23.9
Tarija (178K) 28.9 - 49.3 with 65.6
Santa Cruz (811K) 28.9 - 46.3 with 33.5
Beni (135K) 13.1 (coming third) - 56.3 with just 6.8
Pando (26K) 25.1 - 45.6 with 54.1

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2005, 07:11:54 AM »

You make Obrador sound a lot like Helmut Kohl.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2005, 08:00:56 AM »

"Boliviens neuer Präsident nennt Bush Terrorist

Im Wahlkampf hatte sich Boliviens künftiger Präsident schon als Alptraum der USA bezeichnet. Nach seinem Sieg betitelte der Sozialist Evo Morales Präsident George W. Bush nun als Terroristen.

Dubai - "Der einzige Terrorist der Welt, den ich kenne, ist Bush. Seine Militärinterventionen wie die im Irak, das ist Staatsterrorismus", sagte Morales dem arabischen TV-Sender Al-Dschasira. Es gebe einen Unterschied, ob Menschen für eine Sache kämpften oder als Terroristen agierten, sagte Morales. "Heute in Bolivien und Lateinamerika erheben die Menschen nicht mehr ihre Waffen gegen den Imperialismus, aber der Imperialismus erhebt seine Waffen gegen die Menschen, und zwar mit Militärinterventionen und Militärstützpunkten."

Im Wahlkampf hatte sich Morales als Alptraum für die USA bezeichnet. Unmittelbar nach seinem Sieg bei der Präsidentenwahl in Bolivien kündigte der Sozialist erste Schritte zur Verstaatlichung der Gasvorkommen des Landes an. Bolivien verfügt über Südamerikas zweitgrößte Gasvorkommen, 90 Prozent davon gehen in den Export.

Mit Morales steht erstmals in der Geschichte des Landes ein Indio vor der Übernahme der Präsidentschaft Boliviens. Das offizielle Endergebnis der Wahl wird erst in einigen Tagen feststehen. "

I'll just translate the choice bits...
Bolivia's New President calls Bush "Terrorist"

(...) "The only terrorist I know is Bush. His military interventions, such as in Iraq, that's state terrorism," Morales told Al-Jazeera. "Today in Bolivia and all over Latin America, the people are not fighting* imperialism anymore, but imperialism is still fighting against the people, using military interventions [the US hasn't intervened militarily in Latin America since Haiti, and Panama before that Huh ] and military bases."

* as in, armed fighting. Can't be bothered with a stylish translation.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2005, 04:36:19 AM »

You make Obrador sound a lot like Helmut Kohl.

I don't think Herr Kohl was going around claiming that every time anyone coughs in his direction it is a "criminal plot against my life", or am I wrong?
No, his paranoia is of a more eccentric type. Anytime somebody breathes in his presence it is an attack on his role in future history books.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
That was the point I was referring to ... especially the "doesn't spend any of his dirty money on himself, just uses it for a vast patronage machine" part.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2005, 06:39:09 AM »

It's not mentioned in polite conversation, Opebo. Angry
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2005, 11:12:00 AM »

Just thought I'd check regional polarization levels.

By the way, the Electoral Commission says 33.4% of precincts have reported and 29.5% of all eligible voters have voted in them - we're either looking at an extremely high turnout, or the city precincts are much larger and have been counted first.

Morales is at 48.3%, the Conservative guy at 34.7%.

Chuquisaqua (214K registered voters) 51.7% - 35.9% with 48.0% of precincts reporting
La Paz (1.18 mio) 66.1 - 19.1 with 31.0
Cochabamba (649K) 47.1 - 39.9 with 32.1
Oruro (194K) 55.1 - 32.2 with 33.0
Potosí (282K) 49.7 - 36.7 with 23.9
Tarija (178K) 28.9 - 49.3 with 65.6
Santa Cruz (811K) 28.9 - 46.3 with 33.5
Beni (135K) 13.1 (coming third) - 56.3 with just 6.8
Pando (26K) 25.1 - 45.6 with 54.1


Update:
Morales at 54.1%, his opponent at 28.6%.
96.8% of precincts have reported, and 82.3% of registered voters have voted in them.

By province-
Chuquisaqua 55.1 - 31.4 (85.1)
La Paz 66.8 - 18.1 (99.5)
Cochabamba 64.8 - 25.1 (complete)
Oruro 62.6 - 25.0 (99.5)
Potosí 57.1 - 26.3 (95.9)
Tarija 31.6 - 45.3 (complete)
Santa Cruz 32.9 - 42.2 (95.7)
Beni 15.7 (third) - 47.4 (81.2). Second place goes to MNR, 30.0% (nationally fourth, 6.2%)
Pando 20.9 (third) - 45.2 (complete). Second place goes to Union Nacional, 23.2% (nationally third, 7.8%)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2005, 08:24:08 AM »

Evo Morales´ victory is certainly a victory for the left, but I would say the main issue there is not ideology but ethnicity. His (long and boring) speech the election night showed Evo is more about non-whites reaching power for the first time than for a particular set of policies. He already said he will include all ethnic groups (aymara, quechua and white) in his cabinet, because he realises there is no way he will stay in power without white-middle class support.

Regarding his policies, I think we will indeed become much more moderate than while he was in opposition. However, that could cause him trouble with the extreme left (and extreme anti-white quechua leader Quispe), so I think we will have a hard time running the country. Still, I think (right wing) Quiroga would have a much harder time. Sometimes only left parties can do (not so) left things in government...
Yeah, Quispe is the extremist to Morales' moderate. Smiley
I noticed Quispe ran again but fared far far worse than before. He polled 8% last time, something like 1% this time.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2005, 08:26:25 AM »

Yes, I can, but I don't see any connection.

Noriega was a US installed dictator who went haywire and was disposed by his masters.
Morales is a democratically elected president who came into office on a wave (among other things) of antiamerican feeling.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #11 on: December 25, 2005, 04:22:35 PM »

Oh yeah right, that issue. I'd totally forgotten about that.
Say, IIRC Peru lost territory to Chile around then as well. Is this still an issue in Peru too?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #12 on: December 25, 2005, 05:22:26 PM »

Peru also opposes giving Bolivia access to the Pacific.
Why is that? Shouldn't they be making joint cause in trying to get the ancient boundaries back?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #13 on: December 31, 2005, 07:01:09 AM »

Peru also opposes giving Bolivia access toPacific.
Why is that? Shouldn't they be making joint cause in trying to get the ancient boundaries back?
Peru and Bolivia also has their boundary disputes and I'm pretty that the Bolivians hasn't forgotten that they where under Peru for a while. - And hey, we've got a better claim for Holstein that Bolivia has for the Atacama area;)
For Schleswig maybe. Hey, you can have that as far as I care. As long as you support Frankfurt independence in return. (Hey, and Bolivia was called High Peru under the Spanish. I don't approve of naming countries after people anyways. For a return of "Alto Peru" and "Nueva Granada" to the maps of the world!)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2006, 03:36:28 PM »

On German tv they dubbed him thanking "our Gods". I just went "wow, I love it. Paganism Rules!"
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.