Post your 2006 Gubernatorial Election Prediction Maps
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 02:12:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election Predictions (Moderator: muon2)
  Post your 2006 Gubernatorial Election Prediction Maps
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
Author Topic: Post your 2006 Gubernatorial Election Prediction Maps  (Read 71080 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,503
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2005, 02:36:31 PM »

Supersoulty, can you sticky this?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 06, 2006, 01:43:00 PM »

Thanks for finding the old thread, Frodo.  Anyway, here's my new prediction:



Changes:
Dem to Rep:  IA, IL, ME
Rep to Dem: NY, MA, CO, AR, CA, OH
Net:  Dem +3

>30 Tossup
>50 Likely
>70 Lean
>90 Solid
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 07, 2006, 11:39:45 PM »

Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,767


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 08, 2006, 01:33:29 PM »



Here is my first prediction map for this...

30%=seats that will change
40%=competitive seats that will stay where they are
60%=seats that will not change hands, nor be all that competitive.

So:
Dem to Rep: Iowa, Illinois and Maine
Rep to Dem: Massachusetts, New York, Colorado, Arkansas and Ohio
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 15, 2006, 04:03:43 PM »

2006 and 2007.  Dark are pick-ups, light remain same party.



+6 D in '06, then no change in '07.
Logged
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 15, 2006, 07:51:41 PM »

Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,388
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 15, 2006, 08:06:49 PM »

+6 D in '06, then no change in '07.

Louisiana occurs in 2007, I believe, so it should be +1 R in 2007 (according to your map).
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 15, 2006, 09:29:16 PM »

+6 D in '06, then no change in '07.
Louisiana occurs in 2007, I believe, so it should be +1 R in 2007 (according to your map).

No; see Kentucky.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,388
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 15, 2006, 09:32:10 PM »

+6 D in '06, then no change in '07.
Louisiana occurs in 2007, I believe, so it should be +1 R in 2007 (according to your map).

No; see Kentucky.

Oh, I forgot Kentucky was 2007 as well.

Carry on. Smiley
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 15, 2006, 09:36:12 PM »


Thank you; I shall. Wink
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 15, 2006, 09:46:56 PM »

Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 15, 2006, 09:59:36 PM »

Call me crazy, but I like Culver in IA.  Tie Nussle to DC and throw him a f'in anvil.   Oh yeah, dont forget his intern issues.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 15, 2006, 10:26:41 PM »

Call me crazy, but I like Culver in IA.  Tie Nussle to DC and throw him a f'in anvil.   Oh yeah, dont forget his intern issues.

It will be very close, and Nussle could very well lose. I too like Culver, and polls show him running neck-and-neck with the popular Secretary of State. It's more my optimisim on my part. Culver will have to spend considerbale money against another good man Jim Blouin and our very efficent Secretary of Agriculture Patty Judge. A weasel with two legs named Bob Vander Platts is the only opponent Nussle has. He will start the campaign with money, as Culver will have to use it against Blouin and Judge.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 15, 2006, 11:15:55 PM »

What is your problem with Vander Platts?  From what Ive read, he seems like the more conservative candidate (fiscially and socially).
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 15, 2006, 11:17:59 PM »

What is your problem with Vander Platts?  From what Ive read, he seems like the more conservative candidate (fiscially and socially).

He's a flake who was out charmed by Doug Gorss, a pig confinement lobbyist. He couldn't get elected Dog Catcher.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 16, 2006, 12:00:57 AM »

Culver will have to spend considerbale money against another good man Jim Blouin and our very efficent Secretary of Agriculture Patty Judge. ... He will start the campaign with money, as Culver will have to use it against Blouin and Judge.

Not so; Culver announced today that Judge will be his runningmate, and Judge is now encouraging the other Dems to drop out and endorse Culver/Judge.
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,249


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 16, 2006, 09:33:28 AM »



As of right know… I reckon it’ll be a credible performance for the Dems while not quite the massive success some could have hoped for and it might well help to outshine what looks like being a very lacklusta performance in the senate for the Dems against a potentially very robust performance by the GOP.   

Result – Dems +5 (CO, AR, NY, MA and OH), - 1 (PA): Net - +4   .
          - Reps +  1 (PA), -5 (CO, AR, NY, MA and OH): Net – 4. 
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 16, 2006, 12:56:29 PM »

Culver will have to spend considerbale money against another good man Jim Blouin and our very efficent Secretary of Agriculture Patty Judge. ... He will start the campaign with money, as Culver will have to use it against Blouin and Judge.

Not so; Culver announced today that Judge will be his runningmate, and Judge is now encouraging the other Dems to drop out and endorse Culver/Judge.

That does change, but he still has Blouin to worry about, and he is a strogn candidate.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 16, 2006, 02:21:11 PM »



30% Tossup
50% Lean
70% Strong Lean
90% Solid

Switches

D->R
IL, ME

R->D
CA, CO, AR, OH, NY, MA

Dems +4
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,570


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: March 05, 2006, 08:09:06 PM »

Somewhat optimistic, hopefully Democrats can't catch Arnold and fall behind in PA.

Arnold is toast.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: March 05, 2006, 08:10:16 PM »

Somewhat optimistic, hopefully Democrats can't catch Arnold and fall behind in PA.

Arnold is toast.

Polls show a tie, despite him having seemingly bottomed out in approval ratings.   I would hardly say that the idiot is done.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,570


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: March 05, 2006, 08:15:00 PM »

Somewhat optimistic, hopefully Democrats can't catch Arnold and fall behind in PA.

Arnold is toast.

Polls show a tie, despite him having seemingly bottomed out in approval ratings.   I would hardly say that the idiot is done.

All that means is that Arnold has way more name recognition then his opponents. Arnold hasn't broken 40% against either Democrat in the last 4 polls. That's terrible for an incumbent.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: March 05, 2006, 08:17:20 PM »

Somewhat optimistic, hopefully Democrats can't catch Arnold and fall behind in PA.

Arnold is toast.

Polls show a tie, despite him having seemingly bottomed out in approval ratings.   I would hardly say that the idiot is done.

All that means is that Arnold has way more name recognition then his opponents. Arnold hasn't broken 40% against either Democrat in the last 4 polls. That's terrible for an incumbent.

There's a race where all the candidates have very high name recognition, and I could have sworn it was California.  What are the other two's name recognition numbers?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,570


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: March 05, 2006, 08:22:26 PM »


There's a race where all the candidates have very high name recognition, and I could have sworn it was California.  What are the other two's name recognition numbers?

Busted, Bush apoligist.

Ratings in the Field poll released a couple of days ago:

Schwarzenegger: 44% favorable, 49% unfavorable, 7% no opinion
Angelides: 24% favorable, 13% unfavorable, 63% no opinion
Westly: 19% favorable, 9% unfavorable, 72% no opinion.



Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,570


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: March 05, 2006, 08:23:25 PM »

Somewhat optimistic, hopefully Democrats can't catch Arnold and fall behind in PA.
Arnold is toast.

Election:  8 months away.
No one knows any better than anyone else who will win, and I think he will.

If all predictions are equally likely, why don't you predict that Senators Kennedy and Hatch will both be defeated?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.