Post your 2006 Gubernatorial Election Prediction Maps (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 12:37:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election Predictions (Moderator: muon2)
  Post your 2006 Gubernatorial Election Prediction Maps (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Post your 2006 Gubernatorial Election Prediction Maps  (Read 71489 times)
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« on: December 21, 2005, 08:42:55 PM »

2006 and 2007 - confidence map (relative, not actual precentages):

Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2005, 02:48:08 PM »

There are rumors that Murkowski isn't running for re-election.  I think that would be a toss-up, or a solid Dem if Knowles runs again.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2005, 02:04:45 PM »

Illinois is staying put.  Judy Baar Topinka will win the primary, and she's not a strong candidate.  Rauschenberger would make it close, perhaps even win.  As  unpopular as Blagojevich is, Topinka won't be able to take him down.  Especially without Dem primary opposition.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2006, 04:03:43 PM »

2006 and 2007.  Dark are pick-ups, light remain same party.



+6 D in '06, then no change in '07.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2006, 09:29:16 PM »

+6 D in '06, then no change in '07.
Louisiana occurs in 2007, I believe, so it should be +1 R in 2007 (according to your map).

No; see Kentucky.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2006, 09:36:12 PM »


Thank you; I shall. Wink
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2006, 12:00:57 AM »

Culver will have to spend considerbale money against another good man Jim Blouin and our very efficent Secretary of Agriculture Patty Judge. ... He will start the campaign with money, as Culver will have to use it against Blouin and Judge.

Not so; Culver announced today that Judge will be his runningmate, and Judge is now encouraging the other Dems to drop out and endorse Culver/Judge.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.