Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 28, 2015, 11:15:13 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  How would the VRA's redistricting implications play out with more minorities?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: How would the VRA's redistricting implications play out with more minorities?  (Read 1251 times)
Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1698


View Profile
« on: July 08, 2011, 05:52:32 am »
Ignore

Suppose the US remained majority non-Hispanic white, but some states had a consistent majority of their voters as minorities. For example, suppose Mississippi's racial demographics were inverted, so blacks were now a majority and all four Congressional districts could compactly be drawn as majority-black. Would the VRA imply that they must be drawn this way? Or alternatively, if a compact white majority district could be drawn - given that whites are now a numerical minority within the state, would the VRA imply that that district must be created?

Would either of these answers change if the US as a whole was plurality non-Hispanic white instead? Plurality Hispanic? Plurality black? Majority black?


 
Logged

Del Tachi
Republican95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2614


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2011, 02:49:51 pm »
Ignore

That's a good question.

I have no idea.
Logged

only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2011, 02:54:15 pm »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
muon2
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9105


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2011, 11:52:30 am »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue

A state has no obligation to draw more VRA section 2 districts than would be required to achieve a rough proportionality compared to the voting age population (Johnson v De Grandy- 1994). If MS were 55% black, the state could draw only 2 black-majority districts and not be in violation of the VRA.
Logged


Triple transit of Jupiter on January 24, 2015 with shadows of Europa, Callisto, and Io appearing from left to right. Image captured from Bate Papo Estelar/Astronomio ao Vivo (Brazil) live feed.
Del Tachi
Republican95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2614


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2011, 01:32:05 pm »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue

If this is true, that the VRA doesn't protect Whites, couldn't it face a possible legal challenge based on the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment?  The Constitution is colorblind.
Logged

Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32058
France


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2011, 08:27:19 am »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue

If this is true, that the VRA doesn't protect Whites, couldn't it face a possible legal challenge based on the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment?  The Constitution is colorblind.

Indeed, that seems pretty unfair. Still won't happen, though.
Logged

Del Tachi
Republican95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2614


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2011, 10:24:30 am »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue

If this is true, that the VRA doesn't protect Whites, couldn't it face a possible legal challenge based on the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment?  The Constitution is colorblind.

Indeed, that seems pretty unfair. Still won't happen, though.

What makes you say that?
Logged

only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2011, 11:53:55 am »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue

If this is true, that the VRA doesn't protect Whites, couldn't it face a possible legal challenge based on the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment?  The Constitution is colorblind.
The VRA's constitutionality is tested many times - and yeah, it remains contentious in legal circles, and it is likely that it will one day be struck. Though probably not without some kind of major demonstration that it is no longer  necessary.

e.g. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/22/AR2009062200771.html
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
muon2
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9105


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2011, 11:15:06 am »
Ignore

Whites are not a protected minority under the VRA. As to how Mississippi would have to be drawn... depends on communities of interest under the Gingles test. Tongue

If this is true, that the VRA doesn't protect Whites, couldn't it face a possible legal challenge based on the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment?  The Constitution is colorblind.
The VRA's constitutionality is tested many times - and yeah, it remains contentious in legal circles, and it is likely that it will one day be struck. Though probably not without some kind of major demonstration that it is no longer  necessary.

e.g. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/22/AR2009062200771.html

The contentious part is section 5 that requires certain jurisdictions to be "precleared". That was the subject of the suit in the article. As the opinion noted, it's based on old data and old voting patterns.

Section two applies to all states equally, and with the Gingles test it automatically can take new voting behavior and demographics into account. I don't think many observers find that part as troublesome.
Logged


Triple transit of Jupiter on January 24, 2015 with shadows of Europa, Callisto, and Io appearing from left to right. Image captured from Bate Papo Estelar/Astronomio ao Vivo (Brazil) live feed.
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2011, 10:29:40 am »
Ignore

The Gingles test is basically case law that says the law effectively self-annuls if conditions change. Makes you wonder why the Act still needs renewing by Congress. Grin
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines