Gay marriage map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:40:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Gay marriage map
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
Author Topic: Gay marriage map  (Read 30294 times)
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: December 31, 2005, 12:31:14 PM »

And why shouldn't incestuous couples be allowed to get married?

really, really, screwed up kids.  no one should have to live with somehting like your parents being brother and sister
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: December 31, 2005, 07:05:28 PM »

And why shouldn't incestuous couples be allowed to get married?

really, really, screwed up kids.  no one should have to live with somehting like your parents being brother and sister

Why? Not all couples have kids anyway.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 01, 2006, 09:28:40 AM »

And why shouldn't incestuous couples be allowed to get married?

really, really, screwed up kids.  no one should have to live with somehting like your parents being brother and sister

That's your subjective preference. See..Opebo logic works well!
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: February 17, 2007, 12:14:02 AM »

Updated w/ 2006 elections
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: February 17, 2007, 07:39:26 PM »
« Edited: February 18, 2007, 08:51:17 PM by nclib »

updated 2/16

This is a map of all the states that have voted on gay marriage. Blue=ban.



These counties are the biggest homo-lovers
77% Charlottesville, VA
74% Arlington, VA
71% San Miguel, CO
70% Alexandria, VA
70% Pitkin, CO
69% Richmond City, VA
67% Dane, WI
66% Blaine, ID
65% Petersburg, VA
65% Clay, SD
65% Shannon, SD
65% Boulder, CO

Most gay-friendly county in each state:

Arizona - Coconino (Flagstaff) 60%
Arkansas - Pulaski (Little Rock) 35%
Colorado - San Miguel (Telluride) 71%
Georgia - Clarke (Athens, U. of Georgia) 48%
Idaho - Blaine 66%
Kansas - Douglas (Lawrence, U. Of Kansas) 63%
Kentucky - Fayette (Lexington, U. of Kentucky) 43%
Louisiana - Orleans (New Orleans) 45%
Michigan - Washtenaw (Ann Arbor, U. of Mich.) 59%
Mississippi - Tunica 27%
Missouri - St. Louis City 53%
Montana - Missoula (U. of Montana) 49%
Nevada - Washoe (Reno) 37% the first time, 40% the second time
North Dakota - Grand Forks (U. of N.D.) 38%
Ohio - Athens (Ohio U.) 56%
Oklahoma - Cleveland (Norman, U. of Okla.) 31%
Oregon - Multnomah (Portland) 60%
South Carolina- Charleston 35%
South Dakota - Clay (U. of S.D) 65%
Tennessee - Davidson (Nashville) 32%
Texas - Travis (Austin, U of Texas) 60%
Utah - Summit (Park City) 61%
Virginia - Charlottesville (U. of Virginia) 77%
Wisconsin - Dane (Madison, U of Wisc.) 67%
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,948
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: February 17, 2007, 08:47:25 PM »

Grand Forks is home to UND, where my brother goes.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: February 17, 2007, 09:22:07 PM »

Louisiana amendment map



The Amendment only passed 55/45 in Orleans Parish.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: February 17, 2007, 10:06:26 PM »


77% Charlottesville, VA
74% Arlington, VA
71% San Miguel, CO
70% Alexandria, VA
70% Pitkin, CO
69% Richmond City, VA
67% Dane, WI
66% Blaine, ID
65% Petersburg, VA
65% Clay, SD
65% Shannon, SD
65% Boulder, CO

five out of ten are in virginia.  no surprise there, given the ubiquitous bumper stickers.  I haven't read the thread, so someone may have beaten me to the punch, but in case they haven't, you do know what the official Virginia tourism board motto says I assume.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: February 17, 2007, 10:08:48 PM »
« Edited: February 18, 2007, 08:48:37 PM by nclib »

Most gay-friendly county in each state:

Arizona - Coconino (Flagstaff) 60%
Arkansas - Pulaski (Little Rock) 35%
Colorado - San Miguel (Telluride) 71%
Georgia - Clarke (Athens, U. of Georgia) 48%
Idaho - Blaine 66%
Kansas - Douglas (Lawrence, U. of Kansas) 63%
Kentucky - Fayette (Lexington, U. of Kentucky) 43%
Louisiana - Orleans (New Orleans) 45%
Michigan - Washtenaw (Ann Arbor, U. of Mich.) 59%
Mississippi - Tunica 27%
Missouri - St. Louis City 53%
Montana - Missoula (U. of Montana) 49%
Nevada - Washoe (Reno) 37% the first time, 40% the second time
North Dakota - Grand Forks (U. of N.D.) 38%
Ohio - Athens (Ohio U.) 56%
Oklahoma - Cleveland (Norman, U. of Okla.) 31%
Oregon - Multnomah (Portland) 60%
South Carolina- Charleston 35%
South Dakota - Clay (U. of S.D.) 65%
Tennessee - Davidson (Nashville) 32%
Texas - Travis (Austin, U of Texas) 60%
Utah - Summit (Park City) 61%
Virginia - Charlottesville (U. of Virginia) 77%
Wisconsin - Dane (Madison, U of Wisc.) 67%

Looks like University towns were the most supportive in 12/24 states.

In only 3 states was the largest county the most supportive.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: February 17, 2007, 10:12:28 PM »


77% Charlottesville, VA
74% Arlington, VA
71% San Miguel, CO
70% Alexandria, VA
70% Pitkin, CO
69% Richmond City, VA
67% Dane, WI
66% Blaine, ID
65% Petersburg, VA
65% Clay, SD
65% Shannon, SD
65% Boulder, CO

five out of ten are in virginia.  no surprise there, given the ubiquitous bumper stickers.  I haven't read the thread, so someone may have beaten me to the punch, but in case they haven't, you do know what the official Virginia tourism board motto says I assume.

Virginia has independent cities, which explains why the ind. cities are more liberal because they don't have rural areas mixed in with them to form a county.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: February 17, 2007, 10:21:09 PM »

We'll see civil unions on a large scale by the late 2010s and gay marriage by the 2030s.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: February 17, 2007, 10:25:19 PM »


77% Charlottesville, VA
74% Arlington, VA
71% San Miguel, CO
70% Alexandria, VA
70% Pitkin, CO
69% Richmond City, VA
67% Dane, WI
66% Blaine, ID
65% Petersburg, VA
65% Clay, SD
65% Shannon, SD
65% Boulder, CO

five out of ten are in virginia.  no surprise there, given the ubiquitous bumper stickers.  I haven't read the thread, so someone may have beaten me to the punch, but in case they haven't, you do know what the official Virginia tourism board motto says I assume.

Virginia has independent cities, which explains why the ind. cities are more liberal because they don't have rural areas mixed in with them to form a county.

ah, yeah, that's why their election maps always have little dots of one color surrounded by counties of a different color on most election maps.  actually, I'd forgotten that.

Still, I couldn't resist:  Virginia is for Lovers.  Smiley
Logged
RRB
Rookie
**
Posts: 227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: February 17, 2007, 11:27:10 PM »
« Edited: February 17, 2007, 11:28:44 PM by RRB »

Voting for a gay marriage ban gets rid of all of those pesky gay people and sets the agenda for good values, now doesn't it.  That's right,  no more gay people fighting for rights.  Now these states can all go back to the good old days when gay people didn't exist.  Right!!!

Gay marriage bans are an insult to the brains of those who have one, and a Godsend to those whose head is deep in the sand.

Government needs to get it's business out of people's bedrooms, and start legislating with its pants on.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: February 18, 2007, 08:21:30 PM »



Douglas County votes no by a 63/37 margin while the amendment passes 70/30
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: February 22, 2007, 07:22:58 PM »

updated 2/16

This is a map of all the states that have voted on gay marriage. Blue=ban.



Have any of the gray states had statewide referenda on any other gay rights issue. If so, does anyone have maps or results?

I think Maine has had anti-workplace discrimination in a referendum, but I forget the year.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: February 23, 2007, 11:08:40 AM »

Now, ten years after China decriminalized homosexuality and six years after officials removed it from a state list of mental disorders, gay men and lesbians say one of their biggest obstacles is parental pressure to get married.

exerpt from today's Washington post.  I know it seems a bit off-topic, but I just found it interesting and thought you might as well, nclib.  Read the article here.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: February 23, 2007, 11:40:12 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The year was 2005, and Maine voters chose to uphold the anti-discrimination law.  From the Maine SoS:

Question 1: PEOPLE’S VETO

Do you want to reject the new law that would protect people from discrimination in employment, housing, education, public accommodations and credit based on their sexual orientation?

Number of Votes in Favor  181,926 (44.9%)
Number of Votes Opposed  223,274  (55.1%)
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: February 23, 2007, 06:21:42 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The year was 2005, and Maine voters chose to uphold the anti-discrimination law.  From the Maine SoS:

Question 1: PEOPLE’S VETO

Do you want to reject the new law that would protect people from discrimination in employment, housing, education, public accommodations and credit based on their sexual orientation?

Number of Votes in Favor  181,926 (44.9%)
Number of Votes Opposed  223,274  (55.1%)


So the pro-gay rights side won?

Do you have a link to the results?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: February 23, 2007, 06:25:04 PM »

http://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/2005/ref05.htm

Question 1 here.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: February 23, 2007, 06:39:20 PM »
« Edited: February 23, 2007, 06:41:00 PM by Nighthawk »

The map:



Green counties voted to repeal the anti-discrimination law; red ones kept it.

Range was 35% (Cumberland) to 60% (Aroostook).

Interestingly, French Canadians seemed to have narrowly voted yes.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: February 23, 2007, 06:40:51 PM »

Question 1: PEOPLE’S VETO

Do you want to reject the new law that would protect people from discrimination in employment, housing, education, public accommodations and credit based on their sexual orientation?

Number of Votes in Favor  181,926 (44.9%)
Number of Votes Opposed  223,274  (55.1%)

Asking people whether or not they're opposed to rejection?  Even I'd probably be slightly confused by that one.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: February 23, 2007, 06:48:09 PM »

Alcon,

Have any other states had any statewide referenda on any gay rights issue other than marriage?
Logged
J.G.H.
Zeus
Rookie
**
Posts: 186


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: February 23, 2007, 07:17:33 PM »

In 2006, while approving a gay marriage ban 55-45, Colorado also rejected an initiative to provide for domestic parnerships, 48-52.

See http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/electionresults2006G/
and http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/lcsstaff/bluebook/Bluebook2006.htm
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: February 23, 2007, 07:55:37 PM »

Alcon,

Have any other states had any statewide referenda on any gay rights issue other than marriage?

I'll be uploading some more maps related to the homosexual conspiracy this afternoon.  It's one of my favourite issues to track.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: February 23, 2007, 08:16:47 PM »

2006: Colorado narrowly rejects domestic partnerships


Data here

Gains versus Bush performance
Costilla +103.6% (67%)
Conejos +52.8% (59%)
Las Animas +40.7% (41%)
Pueblo +38.5% (38%)
Otero +23.4% (38%)

I think everyone can pretty much figure out what the second number I gave was, and why this measure failed.

On the other hand...

Losses versus Bush performance
Pitkin -21.6%
Summit -17.0%
Eagle -16.3%
Douglas -13.6%
Routt -8.9%

I doubt I need to explain that either.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 11 queries.