*least* ideal state for the preceding atlasian. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 12:09:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  *least* ideal state for the preceding atlasian. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: *least* ideal state for the preceding atlasian.  (Read 12506 times)
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
« on: December 04, 2009, 04:16:40 PM »
Rhode Island
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2009, 04:26:03 PM »
For Libertas: Arkansas. Wal-Mart, the Rockefellers, economic leftists and social authoritarians. He would not like it there.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2009, 03:49:21 AM »
New Hampshire
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2009, 03:55:57 AM »

Ironically, that is where he is.

skip
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2009, 04:19:10 AM »
Vermont
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2009, 04:38:48 AM »

Yes. Vermont is not a dumb state, and therefore will not vote for a dumb hack like you, no matter how much you obsess over it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.