Should it be legal for women to be topless in public?

[nclib]

I say yes. I see it as a victimless crime.

[A18]

No

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Only if they're at least decent looking. If they are they can get a license. Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

[Keystone Phil]

Only if they're at least decent looking. If they are they can get a license. Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

So between those two categories, where does your mom fall?

[Jake]

I'd say only option 3.

[YRABNNRM]

Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

Add in old women and women with horrible, huge boob jobs and we have a deal.

[David S]

When we were in Cancun a couple of years ago there were quite a few women going topless on the beach and around the pools. I must admit it kind of rattled me at first because I wasn't accustomed to seeing ordinary women walking around topless. The first impression was as if I had accidently walked into the ladies changing room, and my immediate thought was that I should cover my eyes and appologize as I turned around and walked away. But of course I knew that this was a public place, not a changing room, and that the ladies in question apparently did not mind being seen. I got used to it soon enough.

On the one hand I think women should have a right to go topless if they want. But on the other hand some people, especially those with children, might prefer not to see it, and their rights should be respected too.

Maybe the best solution would be to have topless areas and non-topless areas, kind of like smoking and non-smoking sections in a restaurant.

[Dr. Cynic]

I'd certainly like it more than dislike it, but, it just seems way out there... Better be Option three, It rhymes

[Dr. Cynic]

When we were in Cancun a couple of years ago there were quite a few women going topless on the beach and around the pools. I must admit it kind of rattled me at first because I wasn't accustomed to seeing ordinary women walking around topless. The first impression was as if I had accidently walked into the ladies changing room, and my immediate thought was that I should cover my eyes and appologize as I turned around and walked away. But of course I knew that this was a public place, not a changing room, and that the ladies in question apparently did not mind being seen. I got used to it soon enough.

On the one hand I think women should have a right to go topless if they want. But on the other hand some people, especially those with children, might prefer not to see it, and their rights should be respected too.

Maybe the best solution would be to have topless areas and non-topless areas, kind of like smoking and non-smoking sections in a restaurant.

A house divided by boobs cannot stand!.... LOL sorry, I had to do it.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

Add in old women and women with horrible, huge boob jobs and we have a deal.

yes, that too obviously.

[Jake]

Who defines ugly? Does the Select Committee on Public Nudity review each woman's breasts and vote hot or ugly?

[YRABNNRM]

Who defines ugly? Does the Select Committee on Public Nudity review each woman's breasts and vote hot or ugly?

Indeed. Each woman that wants to apply for a Topless Permit will have to appear before the committee and be subjected to a "aye" or "nay" vote from the nine members.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Who defines ugly? Does the Select Committee on Public Nudity review each woman's breasts and vote hot or ugly?

Indeed. Each woman that wants to apply for a Topless Permit will have to appear before the committee and be subjected to a "aye" or "nay" vote from the nine members.

yes, that would work.

[ATFFL]

We're going to need more licenses.  If we are going to judge attractiveness to decide what women can wear, can we have a panel to judge intelligence to determine what people are allowed to post their thoughts?  We can stop us from being proposed to some really stupid thoughts.

[7,052,770]

I seriously agree with BRTD on this...

[Keystone Phil]

Only if they're at least decent looking. If they are they can get a license. Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

So between those two categories, where does your mom fall?

I want my question answered.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Only if they're at least decent looking. If they are they can get a license. Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

So between those two categories, where does your mom fall?

I want my question answered.

I don't exactly check out or rate my mom or any relatives, although as she's too old she no doubt would not be allowed to under my system. Not like she'd want to.

[Keystone Phil]

although as she's too old she no doubt would not be allowed to under my system.

Your facism disgusts me, prude.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Do you have a thing for 46 year olds or something?

[Keystone Phil]

Do you have a thing for 46 year olds or something?

Do you hate freedom? Next thing you'll want is a theocracy.

[Hatman 🍁]

Yes, unless we make it illegal for men to be topless. I don't want to see men topless as much as the socons dont want see women topless.

[Gabu]

Only if they're at least decent looking. If they are they can get a license. Ugly ones have to keep their tops on.

I'm starting to get the sense that at least the majority of your political positions are just there because they would benefit you specifically the most.

Anyways, option 3.

[minionofmidas]

Yes of course. Anybody should be allowed to dress any way that they please.

[Speed of Sound]

Sure, I dont see why we should be able to tell them what they should where or how they should wear it.

[opebo]

Yes, as should men, and either gender should also be allowed to go bottomless if they like.  Why should the State care what commoners wear?