Governors Vulnerability Rankings From The Washington Post
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 10:20:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Governors Vulnerability Rankings From The Washington Post
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Governors Vulnerability Rankings From The Washington Post  (Read 8182 times)
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2006, 10:11:07 AM »

Weld espouses every kooky nostrum of the loony left.

I don't know of anyone with a real knowledge of New York politics who thinks that he can receive the Conservative party nomination or be elected.

Indeed, there is real doubt whether he can get the Republican nomination.

please elaborate, carl.

you think weld is a loony leftist?

Well, lets see.

He is pro-Abortion.

He believes in racial preferences.

He supports 'gay marriage.'

He opposes to right to keep and bear arms.

Hows that for a start.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,726


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2006, 10:12:59 AM »

He is pro-Abortion.
He supports 'gay marriage.'

All those mean is that he might be sane.

You think some crazy Operation Rescue terrorist is going to win in NY?
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2006, 10:15:19 AM »

Weld espouses every kooky nostrum of the loony left.

I don't know of anyone with a real knowledge of New York politics who thinks that he can receive the Conservative party nomination or be elected.

Indeed, there is real doubt whether he can get the Republican nomination.

please elaborate, carl.

you think weld is a loony leftist?

Well, lets see.

He is pro-Abortion.

He believes in racial preferences.

He supports 'gay marriage.'

He opposes to right to keep and bear arms.

Hows that for a start.


i support all of those, and i suspect many ny republicans also support those principles.

weld is a bit of a care-free spirit.  he has a capricious nature about him.

while he is not likely to win in ny in 06, im glad to see him back in the public arena.  i only wish hed come back to mass and run for gov.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2006, 10:23:26 AM »

He is pro-Abortion.
He supports 'gay marriage.'

All those mean is that he might be sane.

You think some crazy Operation Rescue terrorist is going to win in NY?
He didn't say that. All he said was nominating Weld instead of someone more Conservative wouldn't increase the Republicans' chances, partly due to vote splitting.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 16, 2006, 11:07:34 AM »

The interesting thing is that the Republican party in New York has an interesting 'learning curve.'

About every twenty years the New York Republican party ticks off the conservatives with predictable results.

See New York Governor's race in 1990

See U.S. Senate race in New York in 1970

Usually it takes about twenty years for New York Republicans to forget the painful lesson they were taught.

Are they getting so stupid they they are jumping the gun this year?

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2006, 11:10:45 AM »

What happened in 1990 apart from Mario Cuomo's reelection?
1970 - was that Buckley? I always wondered how that happened exactly.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: January 16, 2006, 02:14:22 PM »

What happened in 1990 apart from Mario Cuomo's reelection?
1970 - was that Buckley? I always wondered how that happened exactly.

i thought buckley defeated incumbent liberal republican jacob javits?
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: January 16, 2006, 08:30:21 PM »

What happened in 1990 apart from Mario Cuomo's reelection?
1970 - was that Buckley? I always wondered how that happened exactly.

i thought buckley defeated incumbent liberal republican jacob javits?

He defeated Charle Goodell.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,726


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2006, 02:20:45 PM »

Anyways, this argument is pretty pointless. It's been over a decade since a Republican besides George Pataki won a statewide election in NY.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2006, 08:14:46 PM »

What happened in 1990 apart from Mario Cuomo's reelection?
1970 - was that Buckley? I always wondered how that happened exactly.

In 1990, for example, Herbert London, running as a Conservative, had nearly as many votes as the Republican nominee for governor, Pierre Rinfret. Mr. Cuomo, then the governor, was re-elected that year with 2.2 million votes on the Democratic and Liberal lines, to about 865,000 for Mr. Rinfret and 828,000 for Mr. London.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 17, 2006, 11:51:36 PM »

What Carl seems to forget is THIS IS NEW YORK.

A conservative Republican has no chance to win ANY statewide race NONCE< ZILCH ZIP NADA.

Pataki may have had the conservative nomination, but he is almost as socially liberal as Giuliani & Bloomberg are.

Biggest difference between now & the past in NY, is the suburbs especially Long Island and Westchester.  For a Republican to do well in NY state the GOP MUST do wellon Long Island & Westchester.  A conservative Republican especially a socially conservative Republican UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES will do well in the NYC suburbs in a statewide race and will absolutley get dismantled statewide.  Not like it matters because Spitzer has this locked up already, but the only waay the GOP will do well in NY is to have a moderate to liberal Republican, any conservative Republican will get killed on Long Island & Westechester two areas the GOP neecs to even have a prayer.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: January 18, 2006, 07:33:34 AM »

What happened in 1990 apart from Mario Cuomo's reelection?
1970 - was that Buckley? I always wondered how that happened exactly.

In 1990, for example, Herbert London, running as a Conservative, had nearly as many votes as the Republican nominee for governor, Pierre Rinfret. Mr. Cuomo, then the governor, was re-elected that year with 2.2 million votes on the Democratic and Liberal lines, to about 865,000 for Mr. Rinfret and 828,000 for Mr. London.

Thanks, very interesting. How were Rinfret's and London's strenghths distributed, anybody got data on that?

Smash, I don't think Carl's forgetting that ... he's just pointing out that a Liberal Republican's chances aren't really any better, because (in part thanks to NY's unique party system) a Republican can only win by winning over part of the Democrats without angering the Conservative base he needs to start from.
Logged
Governor PiT
Robert Stark
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,631
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 17, 2007, 12:57:14 AM »

Spitzer's the most vulnerable.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: October 17, 2007, 01:02:39 PM »

Yea.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 17, 2007, 03:02:56 PM »


The only Republican who could beat him is Mike Bloomberg. 
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 17, 2007, 03:19:40 PM »

I was being sarcastic. Good thing Bloomberg isnt a republican though.
Logged
Governor PiT
Robert Stark
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,631
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 17, 2007, 04:05:41 PM »


Tom Golisano, Rep. King, and Giuliani could all beat him possibly Jean Piro.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 17, 2007, 10:52:20 PM »

I was being sarcastic. Good thing Bloomberg isnt a republican though.

I do think he can win as an Indy, though.
Logged
Governor PiT
Robert Stark
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,631
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: October 17, 2007, 11:15:11 PM »

Why would Bloomberg challenge Spitzer? There so much alike.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: October 18, 2007, 12:49:01 AM »


Tom Golisano, Rep. King, and Giuliani could all beat him possibly Jean Piro.



KING???  ROTFLMMFAO
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: October 18, 2007, 07:55:34 AM »

Tom Golisano, Rep. King, and Giuliani could all beat him possibly Jean Piro.

Oh, right.  Safe Pirro, for any race.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: October 25, 2007, 08:42:20 AM »

If you want vulnerable, check out the latest Rasmussen poll from IL. Gov Blagojevich is polling at half the approval rate of Bush.

Key numbers:
Pres. Bush (31% approval):
14% Excellent
17% Good
16% Fair
52% Poor
1% Not Sure

Gov. Blagojevich (16% approval):
5% Excellent
11% Good
37% Fair
46% Poor
1% Not Sure

Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: October 25, 2007, 12:29:43 PM »

If you want vulnerable, check out the latest Rasmussen poll from IL. Gov Blagojevich is polling at half the approval rate of Bush.

Key numbers:
Pres. Bush (31% approval):
14% Excellent
17% Good
16% Fair
52% Poor
1% Not Sure

Gov. Blagojevich (16% approval):
5% Excellent
11% Good
37% Fair
46% Poor
1% Not Sure



Meanwhile, Blagojevich could still pull a plurality of general election voters.  Way to be, Illinois.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: October 25, 2007, 02:03:29 PM »

Illinois:  "We don't try very hard!"
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: October 25, 2007, 03:48:49 PM »

Meanwhile, Blagojevich could still pull a plurality of general election voters.  Way to be, Illinois.

And that was with a green party candidate winning 10% of the vote. Sometimes, I kinda wish the Illinois GOP wasn't non-existent.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.