Which of the following is acceptable in war? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 03:55:46 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)

Which of the following is acceptable in war? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Unless explicitly specified, assume civilians are not acting in support roles

#1 War itself is never acceptable		7 (19.4%)
#2 Killing civilians acting in support roles as collateral damage		26 (72.2%)
#3 Targeting civilians acting in support roles		25 (69.4%)
#4 Killing civilians as collateral damage		18 (50%)
#5 Targeting civilians when military targets are out of reach		10 (27.8%)
#6 Targeting civilians to terrorize and/or demoralize		13 (36.1%)
#7 Targeting civilians because keeping them alive would be costly logistically/economically		7 (19.4%)
#8 Targeting neither military of civilian; but killing indiscriminately when loyalties are uncertain		7 (19.4%)
#9 Killing indiscriminately regardless of suspected loyalties		6 (16.7%)
#10 Targeting civilians for personal pleasure		3 (8.3%)
#11 War is acceptable, but NOTA specific actions are		4 (11.1%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Calculate results by number of options selected

Author

Topic: Which of the following is acceptable in war? (Read 4812 times)

Jump to:

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.