Which of the following is acceptable in war? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:35:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which of the following is acceptable in war? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Unless explicitly specified, assume civilians are not acting in support roles
#1
War itself is never acceptable
 
#2
Killing civilians acting in support roles as collateral damage
 
#3
Targeting civilians acting in support roles
 
#4
Killing civilians as collateral damage
 
#5
Targeting civilians when military targets are out of reach
 
#6
Targeting civilians to terrorize and/or demoralize
 
#7
Targeting civilians because keeping them alive would be costly logistically/economically
 
#8
Targeting neither military of civilian; but killing indiscriminately when loyalties are uncertain
 
#9
Killing indiscriminately regardless of suspected loyalties
 
#10
Targeting civilians for personal pleasure
 
#11
War is acceptable, but NOTA specific actions are
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of the following is acceptable in war?  (Read 4829 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« on: February 09, 2006, 05:42:55 PM »

All except the first and last two. Targeting civilians for pleasure is never necessary for tactical or strategic advantage, the rest can be.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.