Stronger International Global Platform

[Global Crier]

Only by building a stronger international global platform of organizations will the answers to peace and security be properly addressed. For this to happen there will be many needed changes that will have to come about to make this possible. As long as the United States government is spending over forty times the annual budget on military spending than all of the United Nations Agencies put together. We will continue to have more wars and less peace in the world.

With the United States spending over 420 billion dollars on military spending which is 43% of the world’s total military expenditure. And all of the budgets to the United Nations Agencies total about ten billon dollars. We will not have enough finical resources to make the needed changes to make it a better and safer world. The United States Government fiscal policies are draining the international monetary system from the needed capital for the developing nations.

Only by creating an independent global platform financed by an International Crude Oil Export Tax (OET)  http://globalcrier.blogspot.com/2006/01/international-crude-oil-export-tax-oet.html will we create a stable and large enough platform to make the needed changes. For some of the nations that are global super powers this will mean relinquishing some of their international powers. For the smaller and less powerful nations this will mean they will have to contribute more to the international originations platform. The taxpayers of any one nation call not be paying for it all without creating a global military empire as we have today.     

[John Dibble]

Got any realistic solutions? Nations don't generally like giving up their sovereign powers to international bodies.

[Global Crier]

 

Jewish people will tell you that other people are jealous because of their great success. To some degree this is true. The Jewish people are so few in numbers yet they have so much wealth and power in the world. Today global tensions are rising and the divide is deepening between nations around the world and the Jewish people of 18 million are in the middle once again. The Middle East oil deals of the 1930’s and the creation of the Jewish State of Israel of 1948 are at the roots of the tensions in the Middle East.

If there were no oil of any significance in the Middle East the Jewish State of Israel would not be the problem it is today. It was with the creation of a few very wealthy Arab families from the western oil deals that fuels the fire of anger in the Arab Streets. Again, so few Arab people with almost everything and so many Arab people with very little to nothing.

The creations of the Jewish State of Israel served three purposes. 1. To be a homeland to the unwanted Jewish refugees from World War II. 2. It was partial reparation for the horrific War Crimes committed against the Jewish society in World War II. 3. Israel is and was a beacon to take the focus of the anger on the Arab street off of the wealthy oil deals. This is why the United States and Great Britain have leading roles in the Middle East problems.

Yes, the people of the Middle East have to solve their own problems, but the outside world has to change their ways with the nations of the Middle East. The wealthy Middle Eastern oil nations have to take a leading role in the region. In the past as a part of unwritten policies the western industrial nations wanted to keep the Middle East divided keeping them from becoming to powerful, again because of oil. To solve the problems in the Middle East you are going to have to solve both of the major problems simultaneously.

International Crude Oil Export Tax   http://globalcrier.blogspot.com/2006/01/international-crude-oil-export-tax-oet.html

 Peace Reform Initiative in the Middle East
http://peacereform.blogspot.com/


 

[Global Crier]

Create three new City States for the United Nation support in international operation. There should be three of the United Nation City State (UNCS) created around the world, one in Africa, Asia and in South America. The proposed host countries will summit their offer to the United Nations for consideration. The three UNCS will function as part of the United Nations being the home bases for the International Peacekeeping Forces and support operations. Each UNCS will have an international airport, warehouses, and training facilities and housing for United Nations operations.

The approximate area of each of the UNCS will be 25 square miles. With the following factors in consideration, the proximity to other nations and international waterways, and the mother nation support in the future operations. The creation of the UNCS will be a trophy for the mother nations. Creating many new jobs and opportunities putting it on the international map.

The main purpose of the three UNCS will be support the international work of the United Nations. UNCS will be the home base for the United Nations Peacekeeping Forces as well as the training centers for United Nations operations. Governments from around the world could send their police and military personal for United Nations Certification as Reserved International Peacekeeping Personnel. The United Nations would maintain the fulltime United Nations Peacekeeper Forces.

All of the UNCS would have training programs in freshwater and sewer management, medical, policing, farming practices and government operation training programs with support training and operations being offered by non-profit NGO’s. The UNCS could be international home bases for some of the international non-profit NGO’s. The three UNCS would be run and operated under the United Nations Headquarters. All land in the UNCS will remain under the ownership and control of the United Nations with lease deals to operations and entities that are working in partnership or support in United Nations operations.    http://globalcrier.blogspot.com/

[John Dibble]

You'd be hard pressed finding a country willing to give up 25 square miles of their land to the United Nations, much less three nations.

[MasterJedi]

You'd be hard pressed finding a country willing to give up 25 square miles of their land to the United Nations, much less three nations.

Besides that it's a horrible idea.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

I agree. We need less international control and more local control. Why should we intervene in a naiton's human rights situaiton? Its not our problem.

[Global Crier]

The United States Peace Core should be the model for the International Peace Core. It could be based in the United Nations City Nation as a separate institution from the United Nations. It could work hand in hand with the United Nations International Peacekeeping Forces on mission around the world. Only by directing more international resources to mission of peace rather than war will we have a different out come to the problems we face as people of the world. The United Nations annual budget is less than most states or nations it is more comparable to a large University or corporation.

Given the magnitude of responsibilities the United Nations has in the world. The United Nations does not have the resources or power to fulfill its mission and goals. By expanding the United Nations role in international hot spots the United States can down size its international military presents. With the United Nations tooled up for preventative actions then maybe fewer global hot spots will break into full-scale war.  With the United Nations stronger in international global affairs it will help make the world a safer and better place for everyone to live.

The United Nations will not intervene in any nations internal affairs unless it is called on to do so by that nation or a mandate by a United Nations Security Council. There is no question that there are a number of super power nations in the world that can win a military war with any number of smaller nations. There is the question if they can win the peace. It is much more economical, practical and socially responsible to rebuild a nation before it is destroyed by war and chaos.

The International Peace Core will take on more humanitarian projects as a preventative measure cutting down on the numbers of global military conflicts. By working together with other nations our differences will become less as global living conditions improve for more people around the world. Then and only then we will have a safer and more secure world.

[ilikeverin]

I agree. We need less international control and more local control. Why should we intervene in a naiton's human rights situaiton? Its not our problem.

Because they are 'human' rights, and we are 'humans', it is our problem.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

I agree. We need less international control and more local control. Why should we intervene in a naiton's human rights situaiton? Its not our problem.

Because they are 'human' rights, and we are 'humans', it is our problem.

Just because they're of the same species of us doesn't make it our problem.