58% of Americans oppose South Dakota abortion law
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 09:22:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  58% of Americans oppose South Dakota abortion law
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 58% of Americans oppose South Dakota abortion law  (Read 2292 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,128
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 10, 2006, 11:26:03 AM »

Not even a majority of Republicans support it:



This just shows that they are NOT in the mainstream on this issue.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2006, 11:27:29 AM »

Not even a majority of Republicans support it:



This just shows that they are NOT in the mainstream on this issue.

That's because it's too strict.  Needs to make allocations for rape and incest.  If it did, I could easily see the support being over 50%.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,128
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2006, 11:31:28 AM »

Except all the laws being proposed in other states are similar to it.

This also severely rebukes people who claim the Democrats are not in the mainstream on this issue and should adopt a position similar to the SD law.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2006, 11:35:04 AM »

The majority in this country are pro-choice.

If this was anything other than a Fox News poll, the number of those opposed would be considerably higher.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2006, 02:03:21 PM »

The majority in this country are pro-choice.


So, am I to understand, the majority of Americans support a woman's right to chose to have an abortion with no restrictions whatsoever? I find that hard to believe

I'm minded to agree with MODU, that the reason most Americans oppose the South Dakota law is because it lacks having rape or incest as a specific criteria for permitting abortions

Dave
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,670
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2006, 05:18:22 PM »

MODU is right in what he's said.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2006, 07:17:45 PM »

Needs to make allocations for rape and incest.

I don't get the "moderate pro-life" obsession with allowing exceptions for incest.  Incest is a voluntary act, and if it's not, it falls under rape.  What's so special about it?  If two biologically related people of age consent to have sex with each other, why treat it as though it's as bad as rape?
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2006, 07:33:10 PM »

This piece of sh**t law actually gives parental rights to those who do the raping.
So not only will a woman be forced to have a child because the law makes no exceptions for that, she is victimized again when "daddy" wants visitation rights.
Complete and utter nonsense.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2006, 08:54:07 PM »

So, am I to understand, the majority of Americans support a woman's right to chose to have an abortion with no restrictions whatsoever? I find that hard to believe

Oh god, not this again.

Same old sh*t on this board.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2006, 09:27:52 PM »

Needs to make allocations for rape and incest.

I don't get the "moderate pro-life" obsession with allowing exceptions for incest.  Incest is a voluntary act, and if it's not, it falls under rape.  What's so special about it?  If two biologically related people of age consent to have sex with each other, why treat it as though it's as bad as rape?

In MOST cases incest is not a voluntary act and from what I can gather coercion.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2006, 09:30:37 PM »

Needs to make allocations for rape and incest.

I don't get the "moderate pro-life" obsession with allowing exceptions for incest.  Incest is a voluntary act, and if it's not, it falls under rape.  What's so special about it?  If two biologically related people of age consent to have sex with each other, why treat it as though it's as bad as rape?

In MOST cases incest is not a voluntary act and from what I can gather coercion.

True, it usually isn't voluntary, especially when it's an adult with a child.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2006, 09:32:37 PM »

Needs to make allocations for rape and incest.

I don't get the "moderate pro-life" obsession with allowing exceptions for incest.  Incest is a voluntary act, and if it's not, it falls under rape.  What's so special about it?  If two biologically related people of age consent to have sex with each other, why treat it as though it's as bad as rape?

In MOST cases incest is not a voluntary act and from what I can gather coercion.

True, it usually isn't voluntary, especially when it's an adult with a child.

Note the bold, gentlemen
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2006, 09:50:19 PM »

Needs to make allocations for rape and incest.

I don't get the "moderate pro-life" obsession with allowing exceptions for incest.  Incest is a voluntary act, and if it's not, it falls under rape.  What's so special about it?  If two biologically related people of age consent to have sex with each other, why treat it as though it's as bad as rape?

In MOST cases incest is not a voluntary act and from what I can gather coercion.

True, it usually isn't voluntary, especially when it's an adult with a child.

Note the bold, gentlemen

Thanks for the compliment, Ebowed.  I think the last time I was called addressed in a group as 'gentlemen' was in high school, and it wasn't necessarily sincere or complimentary....Tongue
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2006, 02:43:39 PM »


Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2006, 03:03:23 PM »

MODU's analysis is the correct one.  That's about it.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2006, 03:15:59 PM »

Most Americans don't live in South Dakota.
But since federalism has long been forgotten by the judiciary...
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2006, 04:36:16 PM »
« Edited: March 11, 2006, 04:39:01 PM by A18 »

I'm not sure where this infatuation with national majorities comes from.

Oh, and does someone have a source on the visitation rights?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2006, 04:45:25 PM »

Whether pro-life or pro-choice, I don't understand why any sane person would support an abortion ban that lacks an exception for rape and gives the rapist visitation rights.

If someone considers any abortion to be murder, then it only follows that these exceptions be disallowed.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2006, 04:49:35 PM »

Rape, maybe. (Is he going to pay child support while in jail?) But visitation rights?

BTW, what the hell does this mean?

Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,779


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2006, 05:42:58 PM »

Rape, maybe. (Is he going to pay child support while in jail?) But visitation rights?

BTW, what the hell does this mean?



It means that rape victims get a free coat hanger.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2006, 05:55:08 PM »

What?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,774
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2006, 06:49:07 PM »

Does this law seriously have visitation rights for rapists? Crazy...
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2006, 07:01:20 PM »

I'll believe it when someone gives me a source.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2006, 07:27:03 PM »

I'm not sure where this infatuation with national majorities comes from.

National majorities will be very important if the right to privacy is taken away by the courts.

Given the Republican majority in congress and a Republican president, a national ban is quite likely.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 13, 2006, 12:26:20 AM »

Regardless of whether someone supports or opposes abortion, rapists should get no parental rights if their actions result in the conception of a child.

If we want to execute the child the crimes of his father, we should at least execute the father to be fair about it.

I doubt Louisiana's legislatures will pass any bills that are not hurricane related in some way for the near future.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 12 queries.