Home 2012 Election Results Election Info Weblog Wiki Search Email Site Info Store

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 10:26:14 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Atlas Fantasy Elections
| |-+  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Gustaf, MasterJedi)
| | |-+  The Anti-Drug Testing Act		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: The Anti-Drug Testing Act  (Read 3499 times)
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17669
United States


View Profile
« on: May 24, 2004, 12:16:48 pm »
Ignore
I hereby propose the following bill to be debated and voted upon by the Senate:

1. No student shall be forced to submit to a suspicionless drug test when there is no evidence that he/she has been using drugs on campus.
2. No school can make suspicionless drug testing a requirement to participate in any type of school activity.


This was my bill at MS Youth Legislature last year, and it passed overwhemingly.  If anyone wants to debate against this, I shall gladly present the overwhelming evidence against random drug testing.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2004, 12:22:52 pm by Senator Harry, PPT-Senate »Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56594
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2004, 12:18:17 pm »
Ignore
I urge all Senators to vote for this measure.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Fritz
JLD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4846
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.48

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2004, 12:32:17 pm »
Ignore
Can we include a clause prohibiting employers from conducting drug tests?
Logged
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17669
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2004, 12:43:16 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Secretary of Labor Fritz on May 24, 2004, 12:32:17 pm
Can we include a clause prohibiting employers from conducting drug tests?
I think we shuold do those as two separate bills.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2004, 12:56:44 pm »
Ignore
I support this bill, and will sign it into law if it is passed in the Senate.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7572


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2004, 01:02:19 pm »
Ignore
I would like to submit an amendment to remove the words "on campus" from the bill and also change evidence to question.


1. No student shall be forced to submit to a suspicionless drug test when there is no question that he/she has been using drugs.
2. No school can make suspicionless drug testing a requirement to participate in any type of school activity.


I think if there is any evidence at all of them taking drugs, then they should be tested, not just if there is evidence that they took drugs on campus.

The question part I have proposed as if there is evidence they are taking drugs, then that means they ARE taking drugs and known to be taking them. Question would imply things like bloodshot eyes, seeming to be "high" in classes and the such.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2004, 01:35:42 pm by John F. Kennedy »Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7572


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2004, 01:26:26 pm »
Ignore
I vote for the amendment.
Logged
TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7791
United States
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2004, 01:36:32 pm »
Ignore
YEA on the amendement.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31527
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2004, 01:38:31 pm »
Ignore
Nay on the first
Aye on the Amendment.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2004, 01:40:29 pm by Senator-StatesRights »Logged
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17669
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2004, 03:11:56 pm »
Ignore
I'll vote Aye on the amendment and of course Aye on the bill.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2004, 03:45:35 pm »
Ignore
I support the amendment as well, and urge its approval by the Senate.
Logged
StevenNick
StevenNick99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1932


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2004, 06:41:41 pm »
Ignore
Nay on the bill.

Nay on the amendment.
Logged


Economic Left/Right: 5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4348
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2004, 04:23:22 pm »
Ignore
Aye on the bill.

Aye on the amendment.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20871
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2004, 06:07:29 am »
Ignore
Because the bill has been edited, I feel I cannot voe on it, but I vote aye on the amendment which is good enough Cheesy
Logged
Fritz
JLD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4846
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.48

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2004, 08:57:17 am »
Ignore
The amendment has passed 6-1
Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7572


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2004, 09:00:14 am »
Ignore
Quote from: Secretary of Labor Fritz on May 26, 2004, 08:57:17 am
The amendment has passed 6-1

Then I vote aye for passing the amended version of the bill.
Logged
StevenNick
StevenNick99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1932


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2004, 06:45:52 pm »
Ignore
I vote against the passage of the amended bill.
Logged


Economic Left/Right: 5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00
TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7791
United States
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2004, 06:56:25 pm »
Ignore
I vote for the amended bill.
Logged
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17669
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2004, 10:05:40 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Senator StevenNick on May 26, 2004, 06:45:52 pm
I vote against the passage of the amended bill.
Huh

I vote aye
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2004, 11:21:10 pm »
Ignore
Has the bill passed now?
Logged
TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7791
United States
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2004, 01:11:06 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: President Nym90 on May 26, 2004, 11:21:10 pm
Has the bill passed now?
only 2-1 so far. Sad
Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7572


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2004, 01:23:37 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Senator texasgurl24 on May 28, 2004, 01:11:06 pm
Quote from: President Nym90 on May 26, 2004, 11:21:10 pm
Has the bill passed now?
only 2-1 so far. Sad

4-1

For: JFK, Texasgurl, Michael Z and Harry.
Against: StevenNick
Logged
TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7791
United States
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2004, 01:26:04 pm »
Ignore
still need to get certain lazy ass senators to vote on bills other than their pet projects.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2004, 01:49:15 pm »
Ignore
Gustaf, please sticky this vote.
Logged
TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7791
United States
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2004, 01:49:39 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: President Nym90 on May 28, 2004, 01:49:15 pm
Gustaf, please sticky this vote.
it's in the unified thread already.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory