Ideologies in Congressional Districts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:12:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Ideologies in Congressional Districts
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Ideologies in Congressional Districts  (Read 6672 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 12, 2006, 03:33:39 PM »
« edited: March 12, 2006, 09:28:25 PM by Frodo »

What are the most socially/economically liberal/conservative congressional districts in your state?
----------------------------------------

Virginia

Socially Liberal

VA-8 (Jim Moran's district, which covers the inner suburbs of Arlington and Alexandria, Falls Church, areas along the Dulles Toll Road to Reston, and the Hybla Valley south of Old Town Alexandria)

Socially Conservative

VA-7 (Eric Cantor's district, mainly dominated by Richmond exurbs and rural areas that extend NW past Fredericksburg to the foot-hills of the Blue Ridge Mountains)

Economically Liberal

VA-9 (Rick Boucher's district, which covers SW Virginia coal country and is therefore strongly blue-collar)

Economically Conservative

VA-7 (Eric Cantor's district)

Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2006, 03:36:57 PM »

Pennsylvania

Socially Left: Probably PA-1

Economically Left: Definitely PA-2

Socially Right: PA-9

Economically Right: PA-19
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2006, 04:33:01 PM »

Pennsylvania

Socially Left: Probably PA-1

Economically Left: Definitely PA-2

Socially Right: PA-9

Economically Right: PA-19

Hmm, PA 1 and 2 have very similar makeups, but I may actually flip those two.  Remember PA 1 is a tad more white and has more of your old working class neighborhoods, but a lot of union members.  Both districts are clearly economically and socially liberal and it's a tough call there.

Addendum:

Most populist: PA 12
Most libertarian: PA 8
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2006, 04:54:14 PM »

michigan

socially left     15 or 12 maybe  

economically  left   13 or 14

socially right  2 or 6

socially economically  hard to say
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2006, 04:59:05 PM »
« Edited: March 12, 2006, 05:29:30 PM by Alcon »

Socially liberal: WA-7 (Seattle)
Economically liberal: WA-7 (Seattle)
Socially conservative: WA-4 (Central)
Economically conservative: WA-8 (Seattle exurbs)
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2006, 05:26:55 PM »

Socially Liberal

TN-5

Socially Conservative

TN-7

Economically Liberal

TN-9

Economically Conservative

TN-7
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2006, 05:37:36 PM »

Socially Liberal - MN-5
Socially Conservative - MN-7
Economically Liberal - MN-8
Economically Conservative - MN-2
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2006, 05:45:17 PM »

Socially Conservative: CA-22 or CA-21
Socially Liberal:  CA-12 or CA-16

Economically Conservative: CA-42 but any of the Orange County districts minus Loretta Sanchez's would work.
Economically Liberal: CA-37
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2006, 09:11:04 PM »

Socially liberal: NC-4
Socially conservative: NC-3

Economically liberal: NC-12
Economically conservative: NC-6
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2006, 02:13:42 AM »

Connecticut:

Socially Liberal: 1 (John Larson)

Socially Conservative (Such things do not exist here prude): 2 or 5, but seriously none of them are.

Economically Liberal: 1 (Larson)

Economically Conservative: 4 (Chris Shays)
Logged
AkSaber
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,315
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 13, 2006, 04:45:44 PM »

Socially Liberal: AK-1
Socially Conservative:AK-1

Economically Liberal: AK-1
Economically Conservative: AK-1

Hehehe....... Tongue Grin
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 13, 2006, 04:54:31 PM »

Connecticut:

Socially Liberal: 1 (John Larson)

Socially Conservative (Such things do not exist here prude): 2 or 5, but seriously none of them are.

Economically Liberal: 1 (Larson)

Economically Conservative: 4 (Chris Shays)

I'd say 5 would be the most socially conservative, don't you think?

And what about 3 being liberal (on both counts)?  1 is the district I'm least familiar with, so I don't doubt you, but 3 seems less than moderate.

Economically conservative: I'm in agreement with you - clearly 4.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 13, 2006, 05:21:11 PM »

Georgia, current districts (those established in 2001, as opposed to 2005)

Georgia is hard to evaluate because the districts are so heavily gerrymandered, they don't really represent established or understandable communities that share such values.

Socially Liberal: 4 (east Atlanta) or 5 (central ATL).  13 (some random ATL suburbs put together) is probably the only other socially liberal district in the state.

Socially Conservative: 7 (northern ATL exurbs), 8 (southern ATL exurbs), 9 (northeast GA), or 10 (north GA).

Economically Liberal: 4 (east ATL)

Economically Conservative: 6 (north ATL suburbs)
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 13, 2006, 05:29:10 PM »

Social Left: NM-3 (north NM)
Social Right: NM-2 (south NM)
Econ Left: NM-3 (see above)
Econ Right: err...this one's tougher to determine...even NM-2 isn't that economically conservative...
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 14, 2006, 08:46:39 PM »
« Edited: March 14, 2006, 09:32:26 PM by Sam Spade (GM) »

Socially Liberal - There are these types of districts in Texas?  News to me.

On the serious side, I would guess Doggett's CD (25) under the new gerrymander, since it includes the greatest amount of Austin of any CD.

Socially Conservative - Tough, tough call.  TX-11 or TX-19, imo.

Economically Liberal - Either TX-18 or TX-30

Economically Conservative - Either TX-7 or TX-26
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2006, 09:25:46 PM »

Economically Conservative - Either TX-7 or TX-25

TX-25, a Hispanic-majority district, is economically conservative? Don't you mean TX-22?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2006, 09:31:42 PM »

Economically Conservative - Either TX-7 or TX-25

TX-25, a Hispanic-majority district, is economically conservative? Don't you mean TX-22?

I mistyped.  Sorry, that should be CD-26.

The old CD-22 would have been up there in conservativeness with TX-7 (suburban Houston) and TX-26 (suburban DFW metroplex), but the re-gerrymander in 2004 made it much more moderate (and Fort Bend County is moderating anyway).

There are also a couple of other suburban Dallas and Houston CDs that could make the most economically conservative case: TX-3 or TX-8 definitely.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2006, 03:35:05 AM »

Connecticut:

Socially Liberal: 1 (John Larson)

Socially Conservative (Such things do not exist here prude): 2 or 5, but seriously none of them are.

Economically Liberal: 1 (Larson)

Economically Conservative: 4 (Chris Shays)

I'd say 5 would be the most socially conservative, don't you think?

And what about 3 being liberal (on both counts)?  1 is the district I'm least familiar with, so I don't doubt you, but 3 seems less than moderate.

Economically conservative: I'm in agreement with you - clearly 4.

The old 5th District (Jim Maloney's) was the most socially conservative, but the new 5th is not all that different from the 2nd, both are all suburbs and rural towns, or at least what qualifies for rural around here.

1 is more liberal than 3, thats just the perception I have. Hartford County is always stronger for the Democrats than New Haven is. The City of Hartford is more liberal than the city New Haven.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2006, 02:08:38 AM »

Socially Liberal

TN-5

Socially Conservative

TN-7

Economically Liberal

TN-9

Economically Conservative

TN-7
Damn it, you beat me to it. I was going to say the exact same ones. Nashville is most socially liberal. Memphis is most economically liberal and the scary 7th, which is an amalagamtion of the suburbs of both is uber-conservative all around.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2006, 02:58:29 AM »

Socially Left: Toronto-Danforth

Economically Left: Hamilton Centre

Socially Right: Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke

Economically Right: Toronto Centre-Rosedale (just a guess, this is where the Toronto Stock Exchange is)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 03, 2006, 03:15:06 AM »


I would have thought that Toronto Centre-Rosedale and Trinity-Spadina are quite a bit more socially leftwing (although that's not because Toronto-Danforth isn't socially leftwing...) actually, 'though Toronto-Danforth is quite a bit more economically leftwing than both...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Kinda obvious Smiley

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's also quite obvious...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah, but it also has a lot of what would be called limousine liberals in the U.S as well as some depreived pockets here and there; I would have said the most economically rightwing would be Don Valley West (I was about to say St Paul's, but there's a small-but-significant lefty minority there)... either way there's a cluster of finance-based ridings in the middle of Toronto that have always had a right of centre economic stance. Mind you, plenty of the more upmarket newer suburbs are quite rightwing economically (although I don't know that area in any sense at all).
Logged
Republican Michigander
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 394


Political Matrix
E: 5.81, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 03, 2006, 11:51:02 AM »

Michigan

Social Right - District 10 (North Macomb, Thumb). Most Michigan GOP (outside the 9th) districts have a lot of social conservatives in pockets. D2 has Ottawa County, D3 has Grand Rapids burbs, D4 has Central Rural Michigan, D6 has Allegan County, D7 has Hillsdale, D8 has Livingston County. D11 has Western Oakland's exurbs. District 1 (Stupak) is generally social conservative as well.

Social Left - District 12 (SE Oakland, although South Macomb is social moderate if not conservative) or 15 (Ann Arbor Area, although Downriver and Monroe is social moderate if not conservative)

Economic Right - District 3 (Grand Rapids area), although 2(West coast), 8 (Livingston), and 9 (Central Oakland) have good arguments.

Economic Left - District  5 (Flint/Saginaw/Bay City), although Districts 1(UP), 12 (S. Macomb), 13 (Detroit), 14 (Detroit), and 15 (Downriver) have good arguments.

Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 04, 2006, 01:22:18 AM »


I would have thought that Toronto Centre-Rosedale and Trinity-Spadina are quite a bit more socially leftwing (although that's not because Toronto-Danforth isn't socially leftwing...) actually, 'though Toronto-Danforth is quite a bit more economically leftwing than both...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Kinda obvious Smiley

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's also quite obvious...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah, but it also has a lot of what would be called limousine liberals in the U.S as well as some depreived pockets here and there; I would have said the most economically rightwing would be Don Valley West (I was about to say St Paul's, but there's a small-but-significant lefty minority there)... either way there's a cluster of finance-based ridings in the middle of Toronto that have always had a right of centre economic stance. Mind you, plenty of the more upmarket newer suburbs are quite rightwing economically (although I don't know that area in any sense at all).

Oh yeah, Don Valley West for sure. It had escaped my mind. Funny how the most economically right wing ridings vote Liberal. In my area, which I know more about, I'd say Nepean-Carleton. It voted for John Baird (provincially) with impressive numbers.

Do you think you can elaborate though on why you think Trinity-Spadina and Toronto Centre-Rosedale are more socially left wing than Toronto-Danforth?

Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 06, 2006, 02:29:18 AM »

Socially liberal NY-8 (nadler's district)
Economically liberal Ny-15 or NY-16 (Rangel/ serano)

Socially conservative NY-26
Economically Conservative NY-20 possibly
Logged
Serenity Now
tomm_86
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,174
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 07, 2006, 08:13:05 AM »
« Edited: April 07, 2006, 08:15:55 AM by Matthews »

Can us UK users try by parliamentary constituencies by "region"?

South-East England:

Socially Liberal
Brighton Pavilion or maybe Oxford West and Abingdon.

Socially Conservative
Maidstone and the Weald (Anne Widdecombe's seat) or Bexhill and Battle? (lots of old people)

Economically Left
Southampton East or Oxford West (only ones to vote labour at least once under Thatcher or Major). I could have put Hastings and Rye but the constituency includes a lot of wealthier places outside of Hastings itself.

Economically Right
Surrey Heath, Henley or Wokingham (I looked at which places had the highest % or owner-occupiers and people with cars...)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 11 queries.