Jimmy Carter for Dean (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:12:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Jimmy Carter for Dean (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Jimmy Carter for Dean  (Read 11547 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« on: January 14, 2004, 08:12:17 AM »

A little but not enough.  Why no endorsement is the bigger question?

Plus embracing the memories of the Carter administration may not be a plus.

Not a plus for a general election.  But you have to remember, Democrats *love* Jimmy Carter; they (in general) have a really hard time admitting that he was a bad president, even worse than Clinton.
Clinton was not a BAD president, so to say Carter is worse than him is an obvious statement.  But in the long run, Reagan did more damage than carter.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2004, 01:11:30 PM »

Carter had only four years to economically screw the country up, but Reagan had 8 and used all of them well.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2004, 01:18:04 PM »

What?  The economy boomed during the 80s and came out of the recession int he Carter days.


Carter had only four years to economically screw the country up, but Reagan had 8 and used all of them well.
Reagan is responsibe for approx. $2.2T of the national debt.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2004, 01:22:35 PM »

$2,200,000,000,000
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2004, 01:31:31 PM »


Not a particularly large national debt given the size of our economy.  Of course the idea of tax cuts and large deficits was to constrain wasteful social spending - 'Starve the Beast'.  I'm not sure if it has worked but at least we haven't had any other horrible initiatives like the New Deal or Great Society.  In fact the latter has been rolled back just a little.  
Yes, 2,200,000,000,000 is alot of money.  National debt just passed seven billion last month.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2004, 01:39:48 PM »


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Yes, 2,200,000,000,000 is alot of money.  National debt just passed seven billion last month.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Seven trillion.  Not bad in an 11.25 trillion economy.
Yes it is.  any way you cut it, seven trillion dollars is alot of money, and paying off seven trillion dollars is impossible, no matter how much time you give somebody.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2004, 02:40:22 PM »

Yeah probably true.  Always wished TR would have lived till 1920 elections as it is widely saidhe would have been nomninee and wanted it.  
He didn't want to run even before he died.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2004, 02:44:36 PM »

OK, Taft won only Utah and Vermont, a total of 1.5% of the EC and 23% of the popular vote. I think that is the worse result ever.
Agreed.  Hoover did badly also.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.