Philosophy on tossups? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:12:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election Predictions (Moderator: muon2)
  Philosophy on tossups? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Philosophy on tossups?  (Read 11875 times)
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


« on: May 16, 2006, 05:05:13 PM »

For me, "tossup" does not mean "I have no clue whatsoever where it is", but rather, "the advantage one candidate has over the other is minimal".  Conversely, "lean" means that one candidate has a significant lead, and "strong" means "I really can't see this candidate losing".

I think that the prediction itself is better to look at than the confidence, given that everyone has a different definition of "strong", "lean", and "tossup".
I agree completely with that. Take the Missouri Senate Race for example. Do I think McCaskill will win? Yes, I do. Do I consider it a tossup? Yes, but I think McCaskill will come out on top.  Would I go so far as to call it "Lean Democrat?" Absolutely not. I'm going to end this self-interview before I start to sound like Donald Rumsfeld.

Basically, it depends on what your definition of "lean" and "tossup" are. I may be optimistic, but I try not to be blatantly partisan.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.