Opinion of Edward McCormack's Comment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:59:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Edward McCormack's Comment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: McCormack's line in the 1962 Democratic Senatorial Primary against Ted Kennedy - Positive or Negative?
#1
Positive
 
#2
Negative
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: Opinion of Edward McCormack's Comment  (Read 1852 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« on: May 21, 2006, 05:59:59 PM »

It's irrelevant, Phil.  Would Bush be president right now if it wasn't for his father/name/grandfather or simply a failing laborer in New Haven?

Al Gore wouldn't have been the Dem. nominee in 2000 and 2008 without his father/name.

The list goes on and on and on.....
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2006, 07:29:49 PM »

It's irrelevant, Phil.  Would Bush be president right now if it wasn't for his father/name/grandfather or simply a failing laborer in New Haven?

Al Gore wouldn't have been the Dem. nominee in 2000 and 2008 without his father/name.

The list goes on and on and on.....

I knew that those points would be brought up and I understand what you're saying. I'm just bringing up a specific situation for a man who is more privileged than both Bush and Gore and I'm honoring the man who called it at an early time.

It is insanely debatable to say that Bush is less privleged than Ted Kennedy.  It's really equal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.