So you believe a science fiction writer over a meteorologist, along with about 99% of the scientific community.
Mmmmmmmmmkayyyyyyyy...
*shakes head* I'm sorry man, but my respect for you has just plummeted.
He's a science hater, he doesn't believe in evolution.
Since no one has ever adequately explained the medhanism by which genetics change in response to the environment, no I cannot believe fully in evolution.
They don't change in response to the environment. For instance, the fish in the ocean did not develop legs because there was a need to go on land. The fish in the ocean instead developed a random mutation, proto-legs, which just happened to aid in their survival, probably by letting them run onto land for short times to escape from predators. Those fish thus lived longer, allowing them to reproduce more, thus propagating that freak mutation. Over time, more and more random mutations built up to the point where fish could walk on land.
That's a bit simplistic, but eh. The point is, mutations do not occur as a response to the environment (with the exception of radiation, but that was rather rare before humans). They may develop mutations that allow them to live longer in the environment in which they live (or in some cases, in different environments), but the mutations to not come about
because of the environment.
