The Hill: Burns frames race against Tester
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 07:54:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The Hill: Burns frames race against Tester
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Hill: Burns frames race against Tester  (Read 2356 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 08, 2006, 04:26:02 AM »

Burns frames race against Tester
By Aaron Blake

Almost immediately upon easily overcoming a primary test and learning that he will face Democrat Jon Tester in November, Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) began trying to regain whatever base support he might have lost in recent months, casting the race as part of a large-scale battle against Democrats.

Burns beat state Senate Minority Leader Bob Keenan in the Republican primary Tuesday by 50 percentage points and faces Tester, the state Senate president, who registered a surprisingly comfortable 25-point win over state Auditor John Morrison.

Tester supplanted Morrison as the candidate with the best chance to beat Burns, though the primary was nearly dead even in recent polls. Morrison was the early favorite but was hurt by revelations of an affair that would have crippled his ability to gain the ethical high ground on Burns, who has been under fire for ties to jailed lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

A farmer who is a member of Montana’s citizen Legislature, Tester is literally and figuratively a pitchfork populist, so tying him to Washington Democrats could prove difficult.

In declaring victory in the primary, Burns thanked those who voted for Keenan for sticking with the Republican Party and challenged Tester to take stances on issues before the Senate, especially the Republican wedge issues of gay marriage, the estate tax and flag burning.

“As a party, we have a choice,” Burns said. “We can stand together and fight Democrats at every level, or we can retreat and say that it’s too messy. I am going to stand and fight, because it’s too important.”

Tester’s campaign did not return calls by press time.

SPIN ON SPECIAL ELECTION BEGINS
Former Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.) beat Democrat Francine Busby 49-45 for California’s 50th District on Tuesday, but both parties were claiming big-picture victories.

Republicans argued that the win proves that Democrats are all talk when it comes to their hopes of retaking Congress. Not to be outspun, Democrats cited the amount of resources Republicans pumped into what would normally have been an easily retained seat.

National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) Chairman Tom Reynolds (N.Y.) declared that “national Democrats did not discover their shockwave in San Diego.”

“The results in San Diego show that nothing has happened to alter the notion that House elections are about a choice between local personalities focused on local issues,” Reynolds said.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) pointed to the Republicans’ large advantage in party registration in the district and the $5 million Republicans spent on the race. Busby ran for the seat against former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R) in 2004 and lost by 22 points; she improved only slightly on her 44 percent showing in the April election that set up Tuesday’s runoff.

“In an election cycle that is shaping up to be a change-versus-the-status-quo contest, Francine Busby has shown that a strong change message can make even former members of Congress vulnerable in deeply red Republican districts,” DCCC Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said.

Reynolds shot back, saying, “There are no moral victories in American politics: Either you win or you don’t.”

Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia Center for Politics said that the Republicans’ investment is “probably $5 million well-spent,” adding that Democrats missed a chance to kick-start their push to retake Congress.

“[Busby] made no progress from the first primary,” Sabato said. “That’s got to be disappointing to Democrats. There’s no way around that.”

Jon Fleischman, publisher of the conservative California politics website Flash Report, said that although the Bilbray win is good for Republicans, the financial drain on the party’s campaign coffers has to hurt.

“There is no doubt whatsoever that what would have been a safe Republican seat with a conservative nominee turned into one of the most expensive boondoggles of all time,” Fleischman said.

WHALEN VS. BRALEY TO REPLACE NUSSLE
Republican Mike Whalen and Democrat Bruce Braley each emerged from bruising three-way primaries to grab their parties’ nominations to replace gubernatorial candidate Rep. Jim Nussle (R) in Iowa’s 1st District.

Now another three-way race might be in the offing, which could prove damaging to Democrats’ efforts to gain a seat in the blue-leaning district.

In what’s shaping up to be one of the closest House races in November, former state legislator Bill Gluba told the Quad-City Times after losing the Democratic primary that he is strongly considering running for the seat as an independent. The newspaper reported that Gluba claimed national Democrats worked to sink his campaign.

Gluba finished third, with 26 percent. Braley won with 37 percent, and former state Rep. Rick Dickinson took 34 percent.

Asked for a response to Gluba’s possible run, DCCC spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, “Bill Gluba has been a committed member of the Democratic Party for decades and has a strong record of supporting fellow Democrats.”

Calls to Gluba’s campaign were not answered.

Whalen beat his opponents more handily, taking 48 percent of the vote to state Rep. Bill Dix’s 38 percent and former state party Chairman Brian Kennedy’s 14 percent.

Dianne Bystrom, director of the Center for Women and Politics at Iowa State University, said Braley effectively used his stance as the only candidate who supports abortion rights, but she said she didn’t know how well that would play in the general election.

Both Whalen, a restaurant owner, and Braley, a lawyer, are political newcomers who beat politically experienced opponents.

“That could pick up on some sentiments that we’re seeing in national polling with the president’s approval rating not only being low, but the approval rating for Congress being low,” Bystrom said.

DCCC-BACKED FILSON LOSES
The NRCC gloated after DCCC-supported candidate Steve Filson lost in California’s 11th District primary.

Filson was a member of the DCCC’s Red to Blue program and is the third DCCC-backed candidate to lose a primary, joining Andrew Horne in Kentucky’s 3rd District and Joe Sulzer in Ohio’s 18th.

Jerry McNerney, supported by the state Democratic Party, beat Filson 53-29 and will face Rep. Richard Pombo (R), who survived a three-way primary that included former Rep. Pete McCloskey with 62.5 percent of the vote.

Democrats also found something to crow about in the GOP primary results, arguing that Pombo’s 62.5 percent was particularly weak for an incumbent.

“Pombo’s disappointing showing in his primary underscores how sick Californians are of his leadership,” Psaki said.

http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Campaign/060806.html
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2006, 05:17:56 AM »

It sounds an awful lot like Burns was hoping dearly for Morrison to win.
Logged
Mike in Maryland
Rookie
**
Posts: 174


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2006, 10:38:48 AM »

Tester can easily frame the race in a different way: a farmer who makes his living from Montana's land who will vote the interests of his constituents, versus a DC insider who gets his money from Jack Abramoff and who votes as George W. Bush and the Washington-based GOP leaders tell him to.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2006, 12:28:22 PM »

It's going to be very tough for Burns. Right now it looks like a Senator Tester is very likely.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2006, 01:09:18 PM »

The Republican party was definitely hoping for a Morrison win!!
Logged
Galactic Overlord
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2006, 06:08:28 PM »

I would have thought Burns preferred Tester, as he polled better against him and Tester is more liberal than Morrison.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2006, 06:29:07 PM »

I would have thought Burns preferred Tester, as he polled better against him and Tester is more liberal than Morrison.

Morrison also had a scandal on him.  Plus, even if Tester is more liberal, he has already begun portraying himself as an average Joe who comes from a third-generation farming family (which he does).  There is no possible way to portray Tester as a "Washington insider" who is out of touch with the people, because his background obviously contradicts anything along those lines.  Tester's image oozes Montana, plain and simple.  Burns will have a heavily reduced arsenal to use against Tester than he would have had against Morrison.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2006, 11:07:22 PM »

I feel a Montana sized ass whoopin' for Burns coming. Can't wait until we get a new head to head poll from this one.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2006, 11:57:39 PM »

Burns is no fool.

He will keep challenging Testor to let the people of Montana how Testor would vote on various issues.

Testor has a problem in the electorate in Montana is a mix of consevatives, populists, libertarians and moderates (very few liberals) while much of Testor's funding comes from out of state liberals.

If Testor continues to duck the challenges, Testor will look bad and will lose.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2006, 12:00:54 AM »

Burns is no fool.

He will keep challenging Testor to let the people of Montana how Testor would vote on various issues.

Testor has a problem in the electorate in Montana is a mix of consevatives, populists, libertarians and moderates (very few liberals) while much of Testor's funding comes from out of state liberals.

If Testor continues to duck the challenges, Testor will look bad and will lose.

For starters its Tester not testo.  Also the guy is a farmer and has the ability to connect with montana voters, while Burns is seen as a corrupt Washington insider.  Tester will win, Burn's is just in too deep & the people of his state just don't like him
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,722


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2006, 12:20:56 AM »

I would have thought Burns preferred Tester, as he polled better against him and Tester is more liberal than Morrison.

Can we get over this myth that spineless "moderate" Democrats some how consistantly run better than Democrats with principles who are unafraid to make a stand?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2006, 12:31:13 AM »

For starters its Tester not testo. 

I love how you, of all people, point out someone's grammatical/spelling errors and you actually misspell Carl's misspelling.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2006, 12:39:27 AM »

For starters its Tester not testo. 

I love how you, of all people, point out someone's grammatical/spelling errors and you actually misspell Carl's misspelling.

I guess you didn't get I did that as a joke & left off the R on purpose...
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2006, 12:40:50 AM »

For starters its Tester not testo. 

I love how you, of all people, point out someone's grammatical/spelling errors and you actually misspell Carl's misspelling.

I guess you didn't get I did that as a joke & left off the R on purpose...

I guess not because that isn't even remotely funny.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2006, 12:46:37 AM »

For starters its Tester not testo. 

I love how you, of all people, point out someone's grammatical/spelling errors and you actually misspell Carl's misspelling.

I guess you didn't get I did that as a joke & left off the R on purpose...

I guess not because that isn't even remotely funny.

I didn't say it was a good joke.  I admit it was a dumb one, but thats why i did it nonetheless.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2006, 01:22:46 AM »

What was the Republican primary turnout vs. Democratic turnout last time Burns was up for re-election?  This time, I believe the GOP primary actually got more votes - wouldn't that be bad news for Democrats?
Logged
Mike in Maryland
Rookie
**
Posts: 174


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 09, 2006, 11:03:13 AM »

I don't have the exact numbers handy, but I believe that turnout in the Democratic primary this week exceeded the GOP one.  Both were contested (the Dems' more so) but that's not a great sign for Burns.

Burns was last up in 2000, when I don't think either party had a really seriously contested Senate primary in MT (correct me if I'm wrong.)  There were contested primaries for other state offices, though, and the GOP swept the state that November--results that were in large part reversed in 2004.
Logged
Sarnstrom
sarnstrom54014
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 679


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 09, 2006, 12:43:27 PM »

This time, I believe the GOP primary actually got more votes - wouldn't that be bad news for Democrats?
No, more Democrats turned up to vote last Tuesday. There were 107,818 Democrats that voted and 97,045 Republicans voted. Go Tester!
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2006, 04:05:31 PM »

Montana Democrats have done a great job.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.