MT And NJ Senate Debates

[Kevin]

Has anyone seen the MT and NJ Senate debates?

[Virginian87]

For the New Jersey Senate debate thread click here:  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=41609.0

I heard that neither candidate sounded very good at all.

[Kevin]

When I was watching it, Both canidates where going at each others throats. 

[Adlai Stevenson]

The Montana Senate debate seems to be pretty genial.  I hope Tester has the stomach to tackle Burns; he has a certain style thats gutsy and got a few laughs from the audience.  I really hope that doesn't mean he can sneak back in on a 'regular guy' performance.

[Conan]

Menendez was awesome in the NJ debate or maybe just good because of how horrible Kean was.

Tester was awesome in the MT debate but I also think that Burns seemed like a nice person, which he really isnt, and a huge liar. Burns is an actor. Tester has huge potential.

[Kevin]

Menendez was awesome in the NJ debate or maybe just good because of how horrible Kean was.

Tester was awesome in the MT debate but I also think that Burns seemed like a nice person, which he really isnt, and a huge liar. Burns is an actor. Tester has huge potential.

In all do respect I thought both canidates in the MT Senate debate were very good I liked both of them. However Tester could improve his game by appering more confident and aggersive, but he did make some good points. However in the NJ Senate debate both canidates sucked.   

[Conan]

I agree, Tester should have been more aggressive in debunking the lies of Burns and how Burns was always saying that Republicans were responsible for some of the good work of Democrats.

[Kevin]

I though Burns and Menendez were both going to get their Asses kicked in their respective debates. However I turned out to be wrong. One pair of canidates did well and the other pair sucked.