Public Library Internet Filtering
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:19:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Public Library Internet Filtering
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Poll
Question: Should (Michigan) libraries filter their internet/are they required to by (Michigan) Public Act 212 of 2000?
#1
Yes/Yes
 
#2
Yes/No
 
#3
No/Yes
 
#4
No/No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Author Topic: Public Library Internet Filtering  (Read 3010 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 20, 2006, 12:29:09 AM »

jfern, could that have to do with bulletin boards being on one and not the other?  I don't know, because for some reason the RNC site isn't loading for me.

You think that's it? The DNC blog allows comments. The RNC blog doesn't seem to.  You're missing out on some real high quality stuff.

Yeah, I'd bet that's why.  A lot of library systems ban any message boards and MySpace-type sites.

EDIT: Which is identical to what Inks.LWC said, which I didn't see.  Anyway.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 20, 2006, 12:34:00 AM »

jfern, could that have to do with bulletin boards being on one and not the other?  I don't know, because for some reason the RNC site isn't loading for me.

You think that's it? The DNC blog allows comments. The RNC blog doesn't seem to.  You're missing out on some real high quality stuff.

Yeah, I'd bet that's why.  A lot of library systems ban any message boards and MySpace-type sites.

EDIT: Which is identical to what Inks.LWC said, which I didn't see.  Anyway.

Did you ever get the RNC site to load?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 20, 2006, 12:35:12 AM »

jfern, could that have to do with bulletin boards being on one and not the other?  I don't know, because for some reason the RNC site isn't loading for me.

You think that's it? The DNC blog allows comments. The RNC blog doesn't seem to.  You're missing out on some real high quality stuff.

Yeah, I'd bet that's why.  A lot of library systems ban any message boards and MySpace-type sites.

EDIT: Which is identical to what Inks.LWC said, which I didn't see.  Anyway.

Did you ever get the RNC site to load?

It works OK now.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 20, 2006, 12:49:16 AM »

One of the greatest acheivements of the internet is freeing youths from censorship.  Youths naturally want to view porn.  Why, as a tender stripling of 12 I can remember hoarding old Playboys, and I can recall in the relatively free days of the early 1980's renting a porn at about 15 year of age!

In this modern era of prudery and theocracy, the internet offers perhaps the only escape for normal youths with healthy sexual interests. 
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 20, 2006, 12:54:11 AM »

I have to say, one of the reasons I do like the internet is because it's the last bastion for free speech.  In as far as filters they should be implemented by the schools, and if parents so choose, but filtering sites for children by the government should be a big no-no.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 20, 2006, 07:13:00 AM »



Yes.  A public library must meet the needs of all their users, including children.  With that in mind, their systems need to ensure that inappropriate material does not display when they do a search.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 20, 2006, 07:42:26 AM »

One of the greatest acheivements of the internet is freeing youths from censorship.  Youths naturally want to view porn.  Why, as a tender stripling of 12 I can remember hoarding old Playboys, and I can recall in the relatively free days of the early 1980's renting a porn at about 15 year of age!

In this modern era of prudery and theocracy, the internet offers perhaps the only escape for normal youths with healthy sexual interests. 

I doubt most youths would be interested in jacking off in a public library in front of all the other patrons, so I don't see much of a point here.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 20, 2006, 08:36:44 AM »

One of the greatest acheivements of the internet is freeing youths from censorship.  Youths naturally want to view porn.  Why, as a tender stripling of 12 I can remember hoarding old Playboys, and I can recall in the relatively free days of the early 1980's renting a porn at about 15 year of age!

In this modern era of prudery and theocracy, the internet offers perhaps the only escape for normal youths with healthy sexual interests. 

I doubt most youths would be interested in jacking off in a public library in front of all the other patrons, so I don't see much of a point here.

All pre-teens are exhibitionists!  The evil oppression of society forces them to hide in shame . . . fearing to show their true selves in public at the risk of being branded a deviant.  Man, don't you care?  Are you a religious or just a fascist?  [/opie-ism]



Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 20, 2006, 12:00:15 PM »

I have to say, one of the reasons I do like the internet is because it's the last bastion for free speech.  In as far as filters they should be implemented by the schools, and if parents so choose, but filtering sites for children by the government should be a big no-no.

So a 10-yr-old should just be able to go look at whatever he wants @ a public library?
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,031
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 20, 2006, 12:33:06 PM »

Funny ironic fact:

When I was in high school, I found outthat my high school had blocked www.freespeech.org
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 20, 2006, 01:47:51 PM »

I have to say, one of the reasons I do like the internet is because it's the last bastion for free speech.  In as far as filters they should be implemented by the schools, and if parents so choose, but filtering sites for children by the government should be a big no-no.

So a 10-yr-old should just be able to go look at whatever he wants @ a public library?

What's that particular library's policy?  (of course this is coming from the hope that someday libraries will be privatised)
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 20, 2006, 01:51:56 PM »

No. Its the duty of the people supervising/watching the kids to deal with any content not the goverment's.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 20, 2006, 01:53:30 PM »




How about NO filtering software, since it's obviously run by partisan Republican hacks?

Well, obviously...
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 20, 2006, 02:08:38 PM »

If it's key word blocking, why would "I support gay marraige," and "I oppose gay marraige," both be blocked?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 20, 2006, 11:31:48 PM »

I have to say, one of the reasons I do like the internet is because it's the last bastion for free speech.  In as far as filters they should be implemented by the schools, and if parents so choose, but filtering sites for children by the government should be a big no-no.

So a 10-yr-old should just be able to go look at whatever he wants @ a public library?

What's that particular library's policy?  (of course this is coming from the hope that someday libraries will be privatised)

Which particular library?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 20, 2006, 11:32:41 PM »

No. Its the duty of the people supervising/watching the kids to deal with any content not the goverment's.

According to the state of MI it IS the govt's duty.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 20, 2006, 11:34:38 PM »

If it's key word blocking, why would "I support gay marraige," and "I oppose gay marraige," both be blocked?

I don't know that gay marriage would be blocked--if you were referring to my earlier statement, it was just an example.  I don't know specifics on the filters--when I tried to get them, the libraries wouldn't tell me--I think they thought I was going to hack into their system or something b/c they gave me bogus statements about the settings are constantly changing.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 20, 2006, 11:52:45 PM »

No. Its the duty of the people supervising/watching the kids to deal with any content not the goverment's.

According to the state of MI it IS the govt's duty.
Then the state of MI needs to f**ck off.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 21, 2006, 01:11:28 AM »

If it's key word blocking, why would "I support gay marriage," and "I oppose gay marriage," both be blocked?

I don't know that gay marriage would be blocked--if you were referring to my earlier statement, it was just an example.  I don't know specifics on the filters--when I tried to get them, the libraries wouldn't tell me--I think they thought I was going to hack into their system or something b/c they gave me bogus statements about the settings are constantly changing.

I was using that as an example.  It would still seem that if it's word blocked, opposition sites would also be blocked.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 21, 2006, 08:39:14 AM »

If it's key word blocking, why would "I support gay marriage," and "I oppose gay marriage," both be blocked?

I don't know that gay marriage would be blocked--if you were referring to my earlier statement, it was just an example.  I don't know specifics on the filters--when I tried to get them, the libraries wouldn't tell me--I think they thought I was going to hack into their system or something b/c they gave me bogus statements about the settings are constantly changing.

I was using that as an example.  It would still seem that if it's word blocked, opposition sites would also be blocked.

And you are right, but there is always an un-filtered computer (required by law), so if you're doing a report on gay marriage bans, just have your parents look it up.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 21, 2006, 09:26:48 AM »


I was using that as an example.  It would still seem that if it's word blocked, opposition sites would also be blocked.

And you are right, but there is always an un-filtered computer (required by law), so if you're doing a report on gay marriage bans, just have your parents look it up.

Well, I'm trying to figure out how the Democratic site would be blocked, but not the GOP site.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: June 21, 2006, 02:27:54 PM »


I was using that as an example.  It would still seem that if it's word blocked, opposition sites would also be blocked.

And you are right, but there is always an un-filtered computer (required by law), so if you're doing a report on gay marriage bans, just have your parents look it up.

Well, I'm trying to figure out how the Democratic site would be blocked, but not the GOP site.

Contact the filter companies.  I'll try to find some info for you.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: June 21, 2006, 02:34:44 PM »

I have to say, one of the reasons I do like the internet is because it's the last bastion for free speech.  In as far as filters they should be implemented by the schools, and if parents so choose, but filtering sites for children by the government should be a big no-no.

So a 10-yr-old should just be able to go look at whatever he wants @ a public library?

What's that particular library's policy?  (of course this is coming from the hope that someday libraries will be privatised)

Which particular library?

Libraries should have the ability to filter their information as each of them sees fit.  You can't shelter children forever-most of them are going to see things they aren't meant to before their time. 

But aside from that you do have to remember that a lot of these 'filters' don't only block out porn, but other information that might be useful.  For example-say a household doesn't have internet and the child's only choice is to go to the library.  Let's say they're going through puberty and want to learn about reproductive systems-but they can't because the nanny state won't let them.  Filters filter out way too much and are inefficient.  I say the best way to deal is to let the library owner set their own policy.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: June 21, 2006, 02:50:16 PM »

I have to say, one of the reasons I do like the internet is because it's the last bastion for free speech.  In as far as filters they should be implemented by the schools, and if parents so choose, but filtering sites for children by the government should be a big no-no.

So a 10-yr-old should just be able to go look at whatever he wants @ a public library?

What's that particular library's policy?  (of course this is coming from the hope that someday libraries will be privatised)

Which particular library?

Libraries should have the ability to filter their information as each of them sees fit.  You can't shelter children forever-most of them are going to see things they aren't meant to before their time. 

But aside from that you do have to remember that a lot of these 'filters' don't only block out porn, but other information that might be useful.  For example-say a household doesn't have internet and the child's only choice is to go to the library.  Let's say they're going through puberty and want to learn about reproductive systems-but they can't because the nanny state won't let them.  Filters filter out way too much and are inefficient.  I say the best way to deal is to let the library owner set their own policy.

The library can--at this point.  The law doesn't say use x filter set at y standard--in fact they aren't even made to use filters (however I think this is a violatoin of the law).  Anyway, what do they need to be looking tht up on the internet for?  Can't their parents talk to them?  Don't schools have sex-ed (which I am against as well--that's the parent's job, not the govt's--but that's beside the point)?  So what's the need to look that up @ a library, when he can just look down?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: June 21, 2006, 02:58:45 PM »


I was using that as an example.  It would still seem that if it's word blocked, opposition sites would also be blocked.

And you are right, but there is always an un-filtered computer (required by law), so if you're doing a report on gay marriage bans, just have your parents look it up.

Well, I'm trying to figure out how the Democratic site would be blocked, but not the GOP site.

Contact the filter companies.  I'll try to find some info for you.

What are they?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 13 queries.